Re: Crate List View With 3 Columns - C / C++ / MFC Discussion Boards

Re: [Message Deleted]

Hamid_RT10-Mar-08 22:36

Hamid_RT

10-Mar-08 22:36

What!?

Re: [Message Deleted]

ThatsAlok11-Mar-08 1:50

ThatsAlok

11-Mar-08 1:50

sorry typo mistake

"Opinions are neither right nor wrong. I cannot change your opinion. I can, however, change what influences your opinion." - David Crow
Never mind - my own stupidity is the source of every "problem" - Mixture

cheers,
Alok Gupta
VC Forum Q&A :- I/IV
Support CRY- Child Relief and You/codeProject$$>

Convert dialog based application to SDI/MDI architecture.

lavate malllik9-Mar-08 22:40

lavate malllik

9-Mar-08 22:40

I have a dialog based application that I would like to convert to a

SDI/MDI architecture.

Please help me out to resolve the above problem.

Thanks in advance.

Mallikarjun

lavatema

Re: Convert dialog based application to SDI/MDI architecture.

Cedric Moonen9-Mar-08 22:54

Cedric Moonen

9-Mar-08 22:54

Well, there's no generic way to do this. You'll have to start a new SDI application from scratch and then copy/paste the functionalities you would like to transfer (and it might be more complex than just copy/paste).

Cédric Moonen
Software developer

Charting control [v1.3 - Updated]

[Message Deleted]

bhat9-Mar-08 22:03

bhat

9-Mar-08 22:03

[Message Deleted]

Re: Crate List View With 3 Columns

Rajesh R Subramanian9-Mar-08 22:12

Rajesh R Subramanian

9-Mar-08 22:12

What is your problem? Why have you posted your task here?

Nobody can give you wiser advice than yourself. - Cicero
.·´¯`·->Rajesh<-·´¯`·.
Codeproject.com: Visual C++ MVP

[Message Deleted]

bhat9-Mar-08 23:20

bhat

9-Mar-08 23:20

[Message Deleted]

Re: Crate List View With 3 Columns

Rajesh R Subramanian9-Mar-08 23:23

Rajesh R Subramanian

9-Mar-08 23:23

Post what? Post your entire problem? And what do you expect in turn? Like - someone else should do your work? That won't happen.

You must do your work and you may ask specific questions which would help you to solve your problem.

Nobody can give you wiser advice than yourself. - Cicero
.·´¯`·->Rajesh<-·´¯`·.
Codeproject.com: Visual C++ MVP

Re: [Message Deleted]

ThatsAlok10-Mar-08 2:02

ThatsAlok

10-Mar-08 2:02

please never delete your comments....

cheers,
Alok Gupta
VC Forum Q&A :- I/IV
Support CRY- Child Relief and You/codeProject$$>

Re: [Message Deleted]

toxcct10-Mar-08 6:04

toxcct

10-Mar-08 6:04

it wasn't worth it, so it's really better deleted, trust me ! Cool | :cool:

[VisualCalc][Binary Guide][CommDialogs] | [Forums Guidelines]

Re: [Message Deleted]

ThatsAlok10-Mar-08 6:21

ThatsAlok

10-Mar-08 6:21

i trusted you.. and who is A** hole have given me one vote??

"If it were machines, the pair_programming seem to work, but for humans it is pair_crackdown that seems to work! " - Nisamudheen

"Opinions are neither right nor wrong. I cannot change your opinion. I can, however, change what influences your opinion." - David Crow
Never mind - my own stupidity is the source of every "problem" - Mixture

cheers,
Alok Gupta
VC Forum Q&A :- I/IV
Support CRY- Child Relief and You

Re: [Message Deleted]

toxcct10-Mar-08 6:23

toxcct

10-Mar-08 6:23

oops, i reached every messages containing [Message Deleted] and did not see you were in. sorry bro... fixed now.

[VisualCalc][Binary Guide][CommDialogs] | [Forums Guidelines]

Re: [Message Deleted]

ThatsAlok10-Mar-08 9:13

ThatsAlok

10-Mar-08 9:13

toxcct wrote:
oops, i reached every messages containing [Message Deleted] and did not see you were in. sorry bro... fixed now.

sorry buddy!

cheers,
Alok Gupta
VC Forum Q&A :- I/IV
Support CRY- Child Relief and You

Re: [Message Deleted]

Rajesh R Subramanian10-Mar-08 7:10

Rajesh R Subramanian

10-Mar-08 7:10

Don't worry Alok, I've balanced it with my 5 vote. Smile | :)

Nobody can give you wiser advice than yourself. - Cicero
.·´¯`·->Rajesh<-·´¯`·.
Codeproject.com: Visual C++ MVP

Re: [Message Deleted]

ThatsAlok10-Mar-08 7:17

ThatsAlok

10-Mar-08 7:17

thanks brother Wink | ;-)

cheers,
Alok Gupta
VC Forum Q&A :- I/IV
Support CRY- Child Relief and You

InterApplication Mesage

john56329-Mar-08 22:01

john5632

9-Mar-08 22:01

Hi ,

i want to post a message from one application to another So I used
::PostMessage(hWnd,WM_USER+0x011A,0,0);

But this is happning good in debug mode but not in release mode.
I am using FindWindow to get window handle.

Re: InterApplication Mesage

CPallini9-Mar-08 22:29

CPallini

9-Mar-08 22:29

(1) Debug vs Release good old links [^], [^].

(2) To send inter-applications messages use RegisterWindowMessage [^].

Smile | :)

If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.

This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong.
-- Iain Clarke

Re: InterApplication Mesage

ThatsAlok10-Mar-08 2:04

ThatsAlok

10-Mar-08 2:04

pther wrote:
WM_USER+0x011A

WM_USER is now obselete, application should use WM_APP or use registered window message

cheers,
Alok Gupta
VC Forum Q&A :- I/IV
Support CRY- Child Relief and You/codeProject$$>

Re: InterApplication Mesage

Randor 10-Mar-08 4:07

Randor

10-Mar-08 4:07

ThatsAlok wrote:
WM_USER is now obselete

Can you clarify what your saying here and give reference?

I think range 0xC000 through 0xFFFF should be used for RegisterWindowMessage() ?

http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms644947(VS.85).aspx[^]

http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms644931(VS.85).aspx[^]

Best Wishes,
-David Delaune

Re: InterApplication Mesage

James R. Twine10-Mar-08 4:36

James R. Twine

10-Mar-08 4:36

Randor wrote:
Can you clarify what your saying here and give reference?

Common Knowledge - and CK should never require a reference...! Smile | :)

   The difference between using WM_USER and WM_APP is that some of the Win32 common controls use messages in the WM_USER + some value range. For example, the Toolbar control uses at least WM_USER + 1 to WM_USER + 69.

   WM_USER starts at 0x0400 while WM_APP starts at 0x8000. No standard controls use any messages in the WM_APP+ range - this is a Microsoft "standard" for lack of a better word. The range 0xC000 to 0xFFFF is used BY RegisterWindowMessage(...) so you should also avoid that range - there could be applications that look at a message's value (or what range it falls into) to determine how it should be processed (or not).

   Need a custom message value, and do not want to waste a registered window message on it? Then use WM_APP as the base value for the message.

   Peace!

-=- James
Please rate this message - let me know if I helped or not!<hr></hr>If you think it costs a lot to do it right, just wait until you find out how much it costs to do it wrong!
Remember that Professional Driver on Closed Course does not mean your Dumb Ass on a Public Road!
See DeleteFXPFiles

Re: InterApplication Mesage

Randor 10-Mar-08 4:53

Randor

10-Mar-08 4:53

I am not the original poster. I know the difference between the custom ranged messages, but I am asking for clarification of WM_USER being obsolete?

-David Delaune

Re: InterApplication Mesage

James R. Twine10-Mar-08 5:12

James R. Twine

10-Mar-08 5:12

Randor wrote:
[...] but I am asking for clarification of WM_USER being obsolete?

Not really obsolete, but not appropriate for inter-application exchange - right from MS documentation:

0 through WM_USER – 1    Messages reserved for use by the system. 
WM_USER through 0x7FFF   Integer messages for use by private window classes. 
WM_APP through 0xBFFF    Messages available for use by applications. 
0xC000 through 0xFFFF    String messages for use by applications. 
Greater than 0xFFFF      Reserved by the system for future use.

MS Sez:
Message numbers in the second range (WM_USER through 0x7FFF) can be defined and used by an application to send messages within a private window class. These values cannot be used to define messages that are meaningful throughout an application, because some predefined window classes already define values in this range. For example, predefined control classes such as BUTTON, EDIT, LISTBOX, and COMBOBOX may use these values. Messages in this range should not be sent to other applications unless the applications have been designed to exchange messages and to attach the same meaning to the message numbers.

Message numbers in the third range (0x8000 through 0xBFFF) are available for application to use as private messages. Message in this range do not conflict with system messages.

   So! While you CAN use WM_USER as a base for custom inter-application messages, it is implied, if not recommended, that you use WM_APP.

   This is from the VC++6.0 docs, BTW - 7+ years ago qualifies as common knowledge in my book.

   Peace!

Re: InterApplication Mesage

Randor 10-Mar-08 6:00

Randor

10-Mar-08 6:00

James R. Twine wrote:
Not really obsolete

Thanks,
Thats all I was asking.

James R. Twine wrote:
So! While you CAN use WM_USER as a base for custom inter-application messages, it is implied, if not recommended, that you use WM_APP.
This is from the VC++6.0 docs, BTW - 7+ years ago qualifies as common knowledge in my book.

Actually it recommends 0xC000 through 0xFFFF for 'string' messages which are RegisterWindowMessage unique 'named' messages. It does not recommend WM_APP for inter-process messages.

http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms644947(VS.85).aspx[^]

Anyway, you continue to give answers to questions that I have never asked. All I was asking is for clarification of WM_USER being deprecated.

Lets not continue this discussion any further.

Best Wishes,
-David Delaune

Re: InterApplication Mesage

ThatsAlok10-Mar-08 5:25

ThatsAlok

10-Mar-08 5:25

this might help http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms644931(VS.85).aspx

Re: InterApplication Mesage

Randor 10-Mar-08 6:04

Randor

10-Mar-08 6:04

The referenced page does not say anything about WM_USER being deprecated. Communicating with some of you CP guys seems difficult at times. I thought I asked a simple question, but perhaps its my fault for not wording it more correctly.

Forget I ever posted a response to your message. Lets not continue the discussion further.

Best Wishes,
-David Delaune

Use Ctrl+Left/Right to switch messages, Ctrl+Up/Down to switch threads, Ctrl+Shift+Left/Right to switch pages.