|
Tahir Abbasi wrote: thats mean u don't know .
You are right, I don't know. But, you know what? If I was trying to do it, it would get done. I would do it myself, without posting the same question over and over. I would do the necessary research on how to get it done. That's the difference between a real developer and some lazy ass like yourself.
Tahir Abbasi wrote: what is meant my "INDIAN "?? is this method ?
What? Is that a question? If so, what?
I'm going to become rich when I create a device that allows me to punch people in the face over the internet.
"If an Indian asked a programming question in the forest, would it still be urgent?" - John Simmons / outlaw programmer
|
|
|
|
|
It is a malformed question. Too many ? in the statement, the Plain English compiler should just crap out right there on the spot 
"What's your question? All I see is some deranged, half-assed looking run-on sentence. Where are you having problems?" - Justin Perez
|
|
|
|
|
Not the PE compiler. Has Negus returned? Did I miss this?
|
|
|
|
|
Pete O'Hanlon wrote: Has Negus returned?
To my knowledge, no.
Pete O'Hanlon wrote: Not the PE compiler
Speaking of which, did you actually ever try it? I didn't and I'll prefer to stick to C-style languages like C/C++/C#, and ummm, yes, Java ( doing a little development on my blackberry with it from time to time - nothing super exciting ).
"I guess it's what separates the professionals from the drag and drop, girly wirly, namby pamby, wishy washy, can't code for crap types." - Pete O'Hanlon
|
|
|
|
|
Paul Conrad wrote: Speaking of which, did you actually ever try it?
I did. If it hadn't been so unwindows, I might have actualy been tempted - well, that and the fact that it didn't actually allow you to natively interact with anything useful such as a database.
|
|
|
|
|
Pete O'Hanlon wrote: so unwindows
That is the impression I got from the demo and it just didn't suit me at all.
"I guess it's what separates the professionals from the drag and drop, girly wirly, namby pamby, wishy washy, can't code for crap types." - Pete O'Hanlon
|
|
|
|
|
Apparently Negus is supposed to be working on a .NET version of PE. That should be interesting.
|
|
|
|
|
Where did you see that?
Pete O'Hanlon wrote: That should be interesting.
Yes, as long as he stays within the bounds of the .NET Framework...
"I guess it's what separates the professionals from the drag and drop, girly wirly, namby pamby, wishy washy, can't code for crap types." - Pete O'Hanlon
|
|
|
|
|
Paul Conrad wrote: Where did you see that?
I can't remember who posted it, but it was in the lounge a while back. There was nearly snortage when I read that.
|
|
|
|
|
Pete O'Hanlon wrote: There was nearly snortage when I read that.
"I guess it's what separates the professionals from the drag and drop, girly wirly, namby pamby, wishy washy, can't code for crap types." - Pete O'Hanlon
|
|
|
|
|
With an error message on a beautiful blue screen we all hate....
"Fatal Error Occured at Memory 0x000000 - Re-Install your english compiler and try to do some work rather than wasting time in fighting. The amount of time you wasted could have been enough for making your very own firewall.
The causes of this error may include weird question you dont know yourself, or you might be asking for code not for idea by not asking for code.
Memory Dump: 100% Un-reachable"
Do rate the reply, if it helps or even if it doesnot, because it helps the members to know, what solved the issue. Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
My humble request, why dont you place your problem infront of your teachers and ask for better ideas (not for code!!), they are also paid for this, not like us who solely try to solve problem for our very own self-satisfaction - i.e. if you are really interested in learning and making progress! Otherwise, keep on fighting bu to no avail!
Have a great time!
Regards,
Adeel
Do rate the reply, if it helps or even if it doesnot, because it helps the members to know, what solved the issue. Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I am trying to create a custom workflow using Visual Studio 2005 for SharePoint Services 3.0.
I've installed the VS 2005 extensions for SharePoint and for WorkFlow Foundation. When I try to create a new project, I'm getting the error:
" The designer could not be shown for this file because none of the classes within it can be designed."
Initially it showed that the dll "microsoft.sharepoint.WorkflowActions" could not be found. So I copied this dll form Server where WSS 3.0 is installed and put in "C:\Program Files\Common Files\Microsoft Shared\web server extensions\12\ISAPI" in my PC and added the reference. Still the designer error persists.
Could someone please assist me with this issue?
Regards,
Blumen
|
|
|
|
|
Hi
I've transmitted live video successfully from server to client using udp but now I want to broadcast video to all connected clients using broadcasting technique,here I'm getting problem in transmission of video frame but Multi msgs are broadcasting to all clients easily&successfully.
Please tell me why one video frame which were easily sent before, when I didnt use broadcast option, not sending now?
where can be problem as in same method I transmitted msgs but when tried to sent frame it didnt.
Try to reply ASAP if any one knows.
Thanx.
Shanzay
|
|
|
|
|
If you're doing this on your local LAN you should check the settings of any routers or other network devices between the server and client, since broadcast messages are sometimes filtered out. If your application is intended for the internet broadcasting is not an approach that will work, as you can read here[^].
Standards are great! Everybody should have one!
|
|
|
|
|
I am using one DataGridView ctrl in my application(.net 2005)in it contains one TextBoxColumn and two CheckBoxColumn.
How should be the format of the XMLfile for the same???
If question is not clear please let me know.
Truth Is The Simplest !!!!
|
|
|
|
|
Neo Andreson,
I am not 100% sure, but i'd have a guess that your XML file would need to have a string column and then 2 columns that can be parsed into bools for the check boxs, so either a true/false or 0/1.
Regards,
Gareth.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm currently looking for a numerical library for C#.
I need to find eigenvalues and eigenvectors and do "least squares fitting" etc.
I found several, rather expensive, commercial libraries, like IMSL (recommended by Microsoft).
I also found a few free libraries:
ILNumerics.Net: http://ilnumerics.net/siteref_Home
Math.net Iridium: http://mathnet.opensourcedotnet.info/
Mapack: http://www.aisto.com/roeder/dotnet/
dnAnalytics: http://www.codeplex.com/dnAnalytics
Does anyone have any experience with those libraries (are they any good?) or know other good free numerical libraries?
modified on Friday, January 25, 2008 5:34:40 AM
|
|
|
|
|
I think ILNumerics won some community prices in germany but I don't have any experience with it (I wish I could find some use for such sophisticated math in my work though  )
|
|
|
|
|
HI
transferring quantity in shopping cart for different items different
quantity..
plz help me with code
thanx in advance...
suman.c
|
|
|
|
|
mrsuman,
Sorry, you'll have to explain a bit more. I don't understand.
Regards,
Gareth.
|
|
|
|
|
I used CheatEngine 5.4 to get two elements: an address of pointer is login.exe+005D1440 and its offset is 4C.
I'm a newbie in C# so I need an example code to find out the Address from two elements as below. Thanh you.
Here is a window named "Change Address" in CheatEngine 5.4 I got:
This pointer points to address 0D6BC004------The offset you chose bring it to 0D6BC050
Address of pointer: login.exe+005D1440 -----Offset(Hex): 4C
You can see, 0D6BC050 is what I want the C# code to print out.
Thank you again.
-=Noob=-
|
|
|
|
|
Well, get the address of login.exe, then:
IntPtr finalAddress;
unsafe {
IntPtr* _pointer;
_pointer = (IntPtr*)login + 0x005D1440;
*_pointer += 0x4C;
finalAddress = _pointer;
}
I may have gotten *_pointer, and just plain _pointer mixed up, but i don't think so.
Try it out.
My current favourite word is: Nipple!
-SK Genius
|
|
|
|
|
many thanks for taking time to look my question.
By following your help, I got address of login.exe is 000005B4 ("000005B4-login.exe" in Cheat Engine Process List).
So is here the finally code?:
IntPtr finalAddress;<br />
unsafe { <br />
IntPtr* _pointer; <br />
_pointer = (IntPtr*)0x000005B4 + 0x005D1440; <br />
*_pointer += 0x4C; <br />
finalAddress = _pointer;<br />
}
I inserted this code i got some errors:
1/Error 1 Operator '+=' cannot be applied to operands of type 'System.IntPtr' and 'int' and Error 2 Cannot implicitly convert type 'int' to 'System.IntPtr'. An explicit conversion exists (are you missing a cast?)
at the line *_pointer += 0x4C;
2/Error 3 Cannot implicitly convert type 'System.IntPtr*' to 'System.IntPtr'. An explicit conversion exists (are you missing a cast?)
at the line
finalAddress = _pointer;<br />
What was wrong?
|
|
|
|
|
Woops, sorry.
Just cast the int as an IntPtr:
*_pointer += (IntPtr)0x4C;
and just add the star to the last _pointer:
finalAddress = *_pointer;
Then assuming i didn't mess anything else up, it should work *crosses fingers*
A pointer with a '*' infront of it means "the value at this address".
And if you ever see '&' infront a regular variable (not a pointer) it means "get the adress of this value".
My current favourite word is: Nipple!
-SK Genius
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
