|
Right, Windows is just a GUI on top of DOS... but why can't I get it to boot to the command line like it used to do...? I really dislike waiting for it to get all the way up just so I can open a DOS box to get some work done. 
|
|
|
|
|
Not anymore!
Although versions 1-4 actually ran on top of DOS, as of version 5.0 (Windows ME and 2000) the DOS core was completely removed from Windows.
|
|
|
|
|
i got 1 powerful Dell Precision 650 and 5 virtual machines but tall running WinXP 
void izmoto(char* szKwazi);
|
|
|
|
|
My main development PC is Windows XP, but I also use virtualization for Multi-OS support. Also, Microsoft has started releasing VPC images for major beta releases of tools and servers.
It is a lot nicer to delete a VPC image than uninstall something that doesn't uninstall well!
Dale Thompson
|
|
|
|
|
izmoto wrote: all running WinXP
One for each day of the work week?
"For fifty bucks I'd put my face in their soup and blow." - George Costanza
CP article: SmartPager - a Flickr-style pager control with go-to-page popup layer.
|
|
|
|
|
Seriously, kinda a poorly worded question. But I guess it does allow to see how many different OS'es people use.
|
|
|
|
|
Have Win Vista Home Premium (soon to be WinXP Pro SP2) on bare metal. Everything else in virtual machines, using my favorite: VMWare Workstation.
Windows XP (use it a lot for testing potentially-malicious software: Snapshot undoes damage in one step; also development machine, as my old apps tend to work without tweaking. i also have to run office 2003 in this, since won't install on vista)
Fedora 8 & OpenSUSE 10 (for Unix/Linux development and testing)
Potentially Coming Soon, after current project, for testing and probably temporary:
EnGard Enterprise Linux (the supposedly super-secure one)
CentOS (heard a lot, but it's web site isn't informative)
OpenBSD (still one of most secure)
FreeBSD (for testing)
QNX - best real-time OS out there
MontaVista Linux - second best? we'll see
SkyOS or MorphOS - saw video of 15s load time. amazing for quick chores. must try it.
Yellow Dog Linux - it is the one on PS3's. will need to be familiar with it.
NetWare - ok, just kidding... (I would just be asking to be hacked )
Later. Hope someone saw something they may like to try in the list. It won't be a silver bullet though: like werewolves, they don't exist. (skin conditions dont count...)
|
|
|
|
|
At last count, Xena (otherwise known as "The Big Black Box Full of Vogons", due to the size and stying of the case) had:
- Vista x86 (primary boot)
- Vista x64 (are you feeling lucky?)
- Windows XP (drab but fast. Unless you are using Explorer)
- Windows XP64 (are you feeling really lucky?)
- Windows Server 2003 R2 (for those "I want to play with domains" moments).
The system drive on this machine lives in a lockable caddy, so multi-booting is tivial. Far simpler than mucking about with boot managers. 
Then of course there are around 20 VMs of various shapes and sizes on their own 500GB drive. It's a fun system to use, especially when running through a 24" widescreen TFT. 
|
|
|
|
|
To sum it up: You have a pure Windows machine.
That's not what I thought about when I read "how many operation systems"... 
My notebook runs SUSE 10.2 and Windows XP Home. That's what I call dual boot ... ah, wait, sometimes it's triple boot! Linux reliable kernel, Linux self-compiled kernel and good old Windows.
_____________________________________________________
This statement is false.
|
|
|
|
|
All hail the supreme Linux user... who cares dork!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yep...but given that we have to support multiple versions of Visual Studio (6, so far!) on multiple versions of Windows it's a reasonable thing to do.
We also use VMs extensively, but of course hosting 64 bit OS's in VMs is somewhat tricky. Of the remaining drives, one is the one the system came with (XP), one is the one it normally runs (Vista x86) and the third (currently Win2k3 R2) is reinstalled on demand as required.
FWIW that one had Fedora Core 5 on it until recently, but unfortunately we had a more pressing (i.e. client driven) need for the disk hosting it, so it's on hold for now. I've no doubt we'll install it again when we can find a better set of drivers.
|
|
|
|
|
Virtual PC has some serious benefits, but you just can't beat a straight on the hardware install
My Vista Boot Menu:
Windows Vista Ultimate 32 Bit(gaming + dev)
Windows XP Professional(gaming + play)
OpenSuse 10.3 (keep your friends close )
OSx86 (shh)
in virtual pc. 2007(i <3 undo disks) on vista
Win 2k3 Domain + a WinXP Client(for home dev/testing/reproductions)
OpenSuse(for quick testing)
Windows XP Pro(for work related development)
Vista Home Premium(Vanilla for install tests)
DrewG, MCSD .Net
|
|
|
|
|
Instead of dual boot, now Microsoft Virtual PCs expose one more way of using multiple operating systems on the single machine.
This should also be counted in the survey right?
Vasudevan Deepak Kumar
Personal Homepage
Tech Gossips
A pessimist sees only the dark side of the clouds, and mopes; a philosopher sees both sides, and shrugs; an optimist doesn't see the clouds at all - he's walking on them. --Leonard Louis Levinson
|
|
|
|
|
|
XP, XP64bit, Ubuntu 7.10, Fedora7
XP, XP64bit for testing
XP64bit for developing
Ubuntu 7.10 for Internet browsing and developing
Fedora7 for testing and developing
I don't like vista but it seems i should install it.
Note that all operations installed locally and I don't use any VM
|
|
|
|
|
I feel the question is a bit ambiguous. I have 3 computers for development, and two of them dual boot. I answered single boot because my latest (primary) development is on XP Pro only, as I don't need to dual boot every computer.
|
|
|
|
|
Pick the highest count on any machine.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
I hadn't booted BeOS in two years... lol
|
|
|
|
|
Wouldn't mind getting ahold of that vm. People used to talk about BeOS long time ago, but I never got to play around with it, see what fuss was about. Know anywhere where still a copy, at least to run in VM for checking it out?
modified on Monday, January 21, 2008 3:47:32 AM
|
|
|
|
|
http://www.bebits.com/app/2680[^]
BeOS has a lot of nice features, not the least of which was the application programming model (which forces you to consider threading). It was a great idea, but probably too much of a learning cruve for most newbies back then.
Enjoy!
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks a lot for the link. Due to the warnings about modern hardware, I've started by getting a vmware image of HaikuOS. Do you know if BeOS installs on VMWare Workstation without trouble? Problems with large amount of RAM are easily controlled, but does BeOS support VMware or was that Haiku only? Again, thanks for your time.
|
|
|
|
|
XP and Vista on the bare metal, XP64 and Vista64 in VMs (for testing purposes). There are additional VMs with other versions of Windows, but those are rarely used nowdays.
And yeah, it'd be cool to use a 64-bit OS for development, but driver support still isn't there.
|
|
|
|
|
Shog9 wrote: but driver support still isn't there
For newish hardware it is, at least the only trouble I've had from Vista x64 has been finding a driver for my wireless card. Mind you it is a cheap and nasty aBit AirPace thingy-ma-bob. Everything else has had drivers for it more-or-less from the off, I did have a bit of problems initially with the onboard sound but that's been sorted a long time ago through a driver update.
|
|
|
|
|
Ed.Poore wrote: For newish hardware it is
There's more than just hardware on the machine itself. I suspect Cisco has a Vista-friendly VPN system by now, but that's a huge upgrade and completely out of my control.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
![Rose | [Rose]](https://codeproject.global.ssl.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/rose.gif)
