|
bigdenny200 wrote: So now, I am tight in my deadlines.
Hmm....in the 5 hours this thread has been around, you probably could have researched and implemented serialization for
a class 
Whether or not you use MFC, I would take a look at Serialization (MFC)[^]
This is an example of a fairly robust, generic, serialization solution.
On the other (easy) end of the solution spectrum, you could simply add a serialize method and
an unserialize method to your class, both of which take a socket as a parameter.
The serialize method would write (binary) all the class' data, one at a time, to the socket.
The unserialize method would read the binary data into the class' members, in the same order it
was serialized. That's a simple, socket-only class serialization solution.
led mike...sorry for posting in your thread 
Mark
Mark Salsbery
Microsoft MVP - Visual C++
![Java | [Coffee]](https://codeproject.global.ssl.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/coffee.gif)
|
|
|
|
|
Mark Salsbery wrote: On the other (easy) end of the solution spectrum, you could simply add a serialize method and
an unserialize method to your class, both of which take a socket as a parameter.
But that will ofcourse only work if the class contains no pointers or virtual functions. If you have already a successful way to save and retrieve to and from a file, your're nearly there if you have no virtual functions. Just use the same code to write to and retrieve from the socket.
Hope you get it together in time
Bram van Kampen
|
|
|
|
|
I'm trying to re-build my app and Im getting this error:
<br />
Linking...<br />
uuid.lib(oaidl_i.obj) : fatal error LNK1103: debugging information corrupt; recompile module<br />
Error executing link.exe.
???
I cant get why this is happening?
|
|
|
|
|
have you by any chance an instance of your application/dll still loaded in memory ?
also, have you tried a clean all/rebuild all ?
|
|
|
|
|
I'm using VC++ 6.0 I tried 'Build->Clean' and than 'Build->Rebuild All' but still the same error!
How can I checked if I have instance of my app still loaded. I tried using TaskManager but did not found under applications or processes tab.
Thanks for help!
|
|
|
|
|
are you building the application in the wrong order ? (not taking care of the interdependencies ?)
|
|
|
|
|
In my app I need 'imapi2.h' so I add d:\vistaSDK\include in my Tools->Options->Directory tab under include files and compile again about mising 'sal.h', I locate it (d:\vistaSDK\vc\include) and include it also.
Now when I try to compile I get:
<br />
uuid.lib(oaidl_i.obj) : fatal error LNK1103: debugging information corrupt; recompile module
???
Thanks for helping me!
|
|
|
|
|
in project settings under C++ tab and pretproccesor category, instead of Tools->Options->Directory tab errors are:
<br />
Compiling...<br />
StdAfx.cpp<br />
d:\vistasdk\vc\include\crtdefs.h(506) : error C2485: 'deprecated' : unrecognized extended attribute<br />
d:\vistasdk\vc\include\ctype.h(175) : error C2485: 'deprecated' : unrecognized extended attribute<br />
d:\vistasdk\vc\include\string.h(61) : error C2485: 'deprecated' : unrecognized extended attribute<br />
d:\vistasdk\vc\include\string.h(62) : error C2485: 'deprecated' : unrecognized extended attribute<br />
d:\vistasdk\vc\include\string.h(67) : error C2485: 'deprecated' : unrecognized extended attribute<br />
d:\vistasdk\vc\include\string.h(72) : error C2265: '<Unknown>' : reference to a zero-sized array is illegal<br />
d:\vistasdk\vc\include\string.h(73) : warning C4003: not enough actual parameters for macro '__DEFINE_CPP_OVERLOAD_STANDARD_FUNC_0_1_EX'<br />
d:\vistasdk\vc\include\string.h(73) : error C2485: 'deprecated' : unrecognized extended attribute<br />
d:\vistasdk\vc\include\string.h(73) : error C2144: syntax error : missing ';' before type 'char'<br />
d:\vistasdk\vc\include\string.h(73) : error C2501: 'strcpy' : missing storage-class or type specifiers<br />
d:\vistasdk\vc\include\string.h(73) : fatal error C1004: unexpected end of file found<br />
Error executing cl.exe.
???
Thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
Are there any limitations in VC6 to the number of times you can use a namespace declaration to add classes to the same namespace within the same header file (or nested header files)?
I've got several in one set of #included headers, and after successfully parsing a few namespaced areas of code, I get the error "syntax error : 'namespace'"!
Any ideas folks?
TIA!
|
|
|
|
|
Steve_Harris wrote: syntax error : 'namespace'
is this the only words the compiler gives you ?! 
please post a relevant error message and a piece of code
|
|
|
|
|
Code is a bit extensive to post. I have a base class header file, with the class definition wrapped in namespace. A derived class header file, also wrapped in namespace, and a number of very small classes derived from the derived class defined in a single third header file, each class is individually wrapped in namespace. I also have a number of other headers all using the same namespace.
If I include the header file containing the small classes I get:
....\parts.h(71) : error C2059: syntax error : 'namespace'
....\parts.h(72) : error C2334: unexpected token(s) preceding '{'; skipping apparent function body
when it hits the seventh class declaration's namespace.
|
|
|
|
|
note, i didn't ask for the whole one, i asked for a relevant piece of code
BTW, you might be missing a closing '}' somewhere, because if we take the example of the std:: namespace, there are tons of stuff inside it, and it's still fine to use.
|
|
|
|
|
toxcct wrote: BTW, you might be missing a closing '}' somewhere,
 That was it...miles from where the compiler error showed up.  Sorry for wasting your time...
|
|
|
|
|
Steve_Harris wrote: miles from where the compiler error showed up
the compiler error was maybe not throwing you at the right place, but the message was talking enough for an insider
Steve_Harris wrote: Sorry for wasting your time
man, i'm glad to help, know it 
|
|
|
|
|
did you forget a ; somewhere ?
Me think you should try to have one namespace per header file.
|
|
|
|
|
None missing that I can see.
If I put one namespace I get the namespace error in one place; if I wrap several class declarations individually one of them (not the first) gets the error.
I think it must be a compiler limitation.
|
|
|
|
|
Maximilien wrote: did you forget a ; somewhere ?
No......a } .....duuuuh. Problem was that the compiler error was miles from the code error...
|
|
|
|
|
I have a modeless dialog that I'm using for several different things in my program in developement. I need to be able to GRAYOUT or eliminate certain editboxes present on the dialog for certain uses in the program. Those GRAYEDOUT editboxes need to be unuseable for certain displays. How can I do this. Please include code in your response.
A C++ programming language novice, but striving to learn
|
|
|
|
|
pEdit->EnableWindow(FALSE);
?
|
|
|
|
|
Yes that works. Thanks
A C++ programming language novice, but striving to learn
|
|
|
|
|
Does this [^] and this[^] help you?
Oh, yes, you wanted code:
++++++++++
[
>+++++++>++++++++++>+++>+<<<<-
]
>++.
>+.
+++++++.
.
+++.
>++.
<<+++++++++++++++.
>.
+++.
------.
--------.
>+.
>.
This may actually print "Hello World!". Its in Brainfuck.
Let's think the unthinkable, let's do the undoable, let's prepare to grapple with the ineffable itself, and see if we may not eff it after all.
Douglas Adams, "Dirk Gently's Holistic Detective Agency"
|
|
|
|
|
jhwurmbach wrote: This may actually print "Hello World!". Its in Brainfuck.
Hell, I write in that language all the time!
|
|
|
|
|
jeron1 wrote: Hell, I write in that language all the time!
Boring - I normally use Whitespace[^]
Actually, it makes me wonder every time again that some people really bother inventing such nonsense...
Let's think the unthinkable, let's do the undoable, let's prepare to grapple with the ineffable itself, and see if we may not eff it after all.
Douglas Adams, "Dirk Gently's Holistic Detective Agency"
|
|
|
|
|
|
WTF is that?
Can that code be translated back to normal code? or is just one direction like the encryption MD5?
Greetings.
--------
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
“The First Rule of Program Optimization: Don't do it. The Second Rule of Program Optimization (for experts only!): Don't do it yet.” - Michael A. Jackson
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
