|
Message: Clicking on the following menu items does nothing.
View -> Server Explorer
Tools -> Connect to database
Tools -> Connect to server
Please advise.
Manish Ganguly
|
|
|
|
|
Are you using Visual Studio 2005? By the way, your questions is not related to "Web development"...
Thanks and Regards,
Michael Sync ( Blog: http://michaelsync.net)
"Please vote to let me (and others) know if this answer helped you or not. A 5 vote tells people that your question has been answered successfully and that I've pitched it at just the right level. Thanks."
|
|
|
|
|
FINALLY GOT IT.....
HAD TO TYPE THE FOLLOWING IN THE COMMAND PROMPT
devenv /resetskippkgs
  
Manish Ganguly
|
|
|
|
|
mgr_2k7 wrote: resetskippkgs
Quoting from MSDN, this commandline switch is for the purpose of
"Clears all options to skip loading added to VSPackages by users wishing to avoid loading problem VSPackages, then starts Visual Studio"
Do you have custom addins or third party software that is interfering? You also need to check whether they are interfering?
|
|
|
|
|
(I'm having to do some crazy stuff with web services, so bear with me.)
Does anyone know if it's safe to assume that there exists one and exactly one WSDL file for each web service that I could possibly want to consume?
And, if so, is there some sort of reference on w3.org (or some other standards organization) that proves it?
|
|
|
|
|
no not really. what you describe is what you'll usually find but it is actually possible to have more than one service within one wsdl file!
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, I was afraid of that. Based on the spec at http://www.w3.org/TR/wsdl#_Toc492291092, it seems like I can't safely make that assumption.
Have you ever had to deal with the case of some web service provider putting more than one service into the same WSDL file? There's a lot that a provider can do (while still following the specs) to make the consumer's job a nightmare, but so far, I haven't had to deal with it yet.
|
|
|
|
|
Well yeah I had to deal with that several times but never had a problem with that.. Look at that simple code written in vbscript
Dim SoapClient<br />
Set SoapClient = CreateObject("MSSOAP.SoapClient") <br />
<br />
Call SoapClient.mssoapinit("http://127.0.0.1/bla?wsdl", "WebService", "SimpleWebServiceSoapPort")
there you can see that even when you use MSSOAP you're able to pass the name of the service, so no big deal unless you're using a client library that doesn't support passing the name of the service... I have worked with a lot of different soap clients and never seen one that doesn't allow me to pass the servicename...
Where exactly do you see the problem?
|
|
|
|
|
I'm working on a .NET front end to an ancient legacy back end, and I'm having to automatically generate legacy data structures based on the WSDL file.
It's kind of like me having to write a utility like Microsoft's WSDL.exe for an archaic system with no support for 64-bit numbers and very limited support for any sort of floating point numbers so that semi-technical business analyst users of the system can easily consume web services without using .NET (or any other modern, convenient tool) in a way that looks and feels easier than right-clicking on "references" and clicking "Add web reference".
There's a large list of things that are likely to go wrong, and I'm working on a solution that will get things done and make everyone involved happy.
|
|
|
|
|
I have a simple question just to clear my concept:
When we issue a request to say http://www.example.com/ by using an HttpWebRequest object and then again send another request to the same site but different page http://www.example.com/page.html then does windows xp maintained a DNS cache for these requests means whether windows again resolve the domain name into an IP or just use its DNS Cache to get the job done or this is just for Windows and no support in .NET?
Thanks in Advance !
AliAmjad(MCP)
First make it Run THEN make it Run Fast!
|
|
|
|
|
Windows has a cache for DNS lookups, browsers generally have their own internal caches as well, and of course there are turtles caches all the way down - the whole DNS system is essentially built on the idea of distributed caching.
---- ...the wind blows over it and it is gone, and its place remembers it no more...
|
|
|
|
|
All i am asking is whether .NET get benefit from this Cache or not ???
AliAmjad(MCP)
First make it Run THEN make it Run Fast!
|
|
|
|
|
Of course.
---- ...the wind blows over it and it is gone, and its place remembers it no more...
|
|
|
|
|
There are also way to get around these caches if you wish to do so.
The best way to accelerate a Macintosh is at 9.8m/sec² - Marcus Dolengo
|
|
|
|
|
i have a question ???????
i have 4 html button in my home page with default active button when i choose any other button it become the active one and display a certain photo
but when i make refresh to the page it reloads with the default button as the active button ignoring the last choise which i have made , if i can save the user choise , how i can save the changes that he had made when the page reloaded every thing back to the default setting
i want the page to be reloaded with the last choise button not the default button
how can i do that ????????
LA ELAH ELA ALLAH MOHAMED RASOL ALLAH
|
|
|
|
|
1. You can store that information in cookie.
2. Onload event of body, you can set the last choice button by reading the value that you stored in cookie.
Thanks and Regards,
Michael Sync ( Blog: http://michaelsync.net)
"Please vote to let me (and others) know if this answer helped you or not. A 5 vote tells people that your question has been answered successfully and that I've pitched it at just the right level. Thanks."
|
|
|
|
|
I'm developing an application where a browser must post messages to the client's message queue. I've successfully managed to create an ActiveX component which achieves the task, but I'd like to know if this is also possible with a .NET component, as ActiveX is a bit too relaxed on security in my eyes.
I've made a basic class, and imported the System.Messaging namespace (C#). The control loads fine in IE as long as it is *not* strong named. But when I call the function which uses MessageQueue, I get the "that assembly does not allow partially trusted callers" message.
So, I sign my assembly, but then it won't load at all, because now my assembly only wants to be called by trusted assemblies, and it looks like IE (or IEHost) is not. I can add the AllowPartiallyTrustedCallers attribute to get my class to start, but then again the MessageQueue functions won't start, since there is not a full trust all the way.
Is there another way? Something I could call on in System.Messaging that makes it accept partially trusted callers? Some permissions I could set on my assembly? Or am I stuck with ActiveX?
Jens Petter Abrahamsen
|
|
|
|
|
I create a one websetup project and build created one websetup.msi in debug folder
This websetup.msi I installed in iis but in IIS showing all .aspx files and .aspx.vb files but I don’t want .vb files in IIS. Is there any option plz tell me
anilkumar
|
|
|
|
|
Hey guys, I'm having a problem sizing table cells. I want to size table cells using percentages. Have a table with for example 3 columns having the with set to 40%, 20% and 40%. So far so good. Then i create two more rows
row
cell - colspan to 2 and width to 60%
cell - width to 40%
row
cell - width to 40%
cell - colspan to 2 and width to 60%
Now I want each cell to contain a div with the width property set to 100% and overflow to 'auto', because I want the div to show scrollbars as soon as it's content exceeds the width of the table cell.
However, if I add some content in the div that's large enough to exceed the maximum width, IE will expand the table cell's width to make sure the object fits. Firefox actually does what I would expect, keep the table intact and show scrollbars.
<br />
<html><br />
<head><br />
<title>Joehoe</title><br />
</head><br />
<body><br />
<div style="text-align: center; width: 100%; background-color: #FF0000;"><br />
<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="1" style="width: 800px; background-color: #EEEEEE;"><br />
<tr><br />
<td style="width: 40%;">Cell A1</td><br />
<td style="width: 20%;">Cell A2</td><br />
<td style="width: 40%;">Cell A3</td><br />
</tr><br />
<tr><br />
<td colspan="2" style="width: 60%; text-align: left; overflow: auto"><br />
Cell B1<br />
</td><br />
<td style="width: 40%; text-align: left;"><br />
<div style="width: 100%; height: 300px; overflow: auto;"> <br />
<div style="width: 583px; height: 400px; background-color: #FFFF00;">DIV having width & height larger than the cell...</div><br />
</div><br />
</td><br />
</tr><br />
<tr><br />
<td style="width: 40%; text-align: left; overflow: auto"><br />
<div style="width: 100%; height: 300px; overflow: auto;"> <br />
<div style="width: 583px; height: 400px; background-color: #FFFF00;">DIV having width & height larger than the cell...</div><br />
</div><br />
</td><br />
<td colspan="2" style="width: 60%; text-align: left; overflow: auto"><br />
Cell C2<br />
</td><br />
</tr><br />
</table><br />
</div><br />
</body><br />
</html><br />
|
|
|
|
|
Eduard Keilholz wrote: style="width: 100%; height: 300px; overflow: auto;"
seems like you need to set the width explicitly.. e.g. "width: 300px" .. I understand that you may not like this solution but this is only solution so far.. I'm testing your sample since you posted here.. i will let you know in case i can come up with some tricks..
but one thing is that you set 800px to the width of TABLE, right? So, i think that it might be okay for you to use the fixed width for TD too..
Can you use Javascript on your host? What about dynamically adjusting the width of TD on the fly?
Thanks and Regards,
Michael Sync ( Blog: http://michaelsync.net)
"Please vote to let me (and others) know if this answer helped you or not. A 5 vote tells people that your question has been answered successfully and that I've pitched it at just the right level. Thanks."
|
|
|
|
|
Erhm, the size of the table in the example is fixed yes, but that is in fact a user setting so it may switch from any fixed value, to a certain value in percentage. In other words, you cannot depend on the 800px width in the table declaration.
I also found out fixed width cells do the trick especially when you set the div inside the cell to a fixed width and height, however I want users to set the width and height properties.
I've also been testing for like eight hours here... no result...
Anyway, appreciate the help :->
|
|
|
|
|
I got one solution for you... I think there might be some issues for TD in IE.. So, I decided to use DIV and CSS for that..
<div style="width:100%; background-color:Red;height:100%">
<center>
<div style="text-align:center;background-color:White;width:800px;height:100%">
<div style="width:40%;float:left">Cell A1</div>
<div style="width:20%;float:left;">Cell A2</div>
<div style="width:40%;float:left;">Cell A3</div>
<div style="width:60%;text-align: left;overflow: auto;clear:left;float:left">Cell B1</div>
<div style="width: 40%;float:left;">
<div style="width: 100%; height: 300px; overflow: auto;">
<div style="width: 583px; height: 400px; background-color: #FFFF00;">DIV having width & height larger than the cell...</div>
</div>
</div>
<div style="width: 40%; text-align: left; overflow: auto;clear:left;float:left">
<div style="width: 100%; height: 300px; overflow: auto;">
<div style="width: 583px; height: 400px; background-color: #FFFF00;">DIV having width & height larger than the cell...</div>
</div>
</div>
<div style="width: 60%;float:left;">Cell C2</div>
</div>
</center>
</div>
I have tested this code in both Firefox and IE. it works .. 
Thanks and Regards,
Michael Sync ( Blog: http://michaelsync.net)
"Please vote to let me (and others) know if this answer helped you or not. A 5 vote tells people that your question has been answered successfully and that I've pitched it at just the right level. Thanks."
|
|
|
|
|
Seems OK to me, but kinda late here right now, so going to try it tomorrow right away. Thx
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah. sure. I hope it will work the way you want. hey. don't forget to try what Shog suggested.. it might be useful too...
btw, why are you still using table-based layout??
Thanks and Regards,
Michael Sync ( Blog: http://michaelsync.net)
"Please vote to let me (and others) know if this answer helped you or not. A 5 vote tells people that your question has been answered successfully and that I've pitched it at just the right level. Thanks."
|
|
|
|
|
Add the style: table-layout:fixed to the <table> element.
---- ...the wind blows over it and it is gone, and its place remembers it no more...
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
