C / C++ / MFC

Re: CTreeCtrl problem in MFC

13-Nov-07 1:29

NishantB++ wrote:
expand the tree first to get the child node

I have.
But then I use CWaitingTreeCtrl from Codeproject[^], and there things are much more complicated.

It might really be that the item does not know that it has children and how many of them.

Let's think the unthinkable, let's do the undoable, let's prepare to grapple with the ineffable itself, and see if we may not eff it after all.
Douglas Adams, "Dirk Gently's Holistic Detective Agency"

Iain Clarke, Warrior Programmer13-Nov-07 2:54

Iain Clarke, Warrior Programmer

13-Nov-07 2:54

The below code is from MSDN. While their samples can be lacking sometimes, they're not usually wrong.

if (pmyTreeCtrl->ItemHasChildren(hmyItem))
{
   HTREEITEM hNextItem;
   HTREEITEM hChildItem = pmyTreeCtrl->GetChildItem(hmyItem);

   while (hChildItem != NULL)
   {
      hNextItem = pmyTreeCtrl->GetNextItem(hChildItem, TVGN_NEXT);
      pmyTreeCtrl->DeleteItem(hChildItem);
      hChildItem = hNextItem;
   }
}

The only thing I can think of that may mess it up is if your parent item does not actually have children in it, but you've manually set its item.cChildren to I_CHILDRENCALLBACK.

Can you check the return value from ItemHasChildren to make sure it's 0 or 1?

Iain.

how to do dynamic memory allocation for stuct?

neodeaths12-Nov-07 22:50

12-Nov-07 22:50

hi i am new to c programming.

currently i am trying to do dynamic memory allocation to my struct so that i dont have to use a set number of array:

struct person ptr[10];//i dont want this

i have come up to this:

struct person ptr*;

could anyone show me how to do a dynamic memory allocation on struct which can free me of having to state the array size?
i read some ebook saying i could use malloc but so far they used malloc on the string instead of struct.
thanks.

jhwurmbach12-Nov-07 23:46

12-Nov-07 23:46

...define person...

struct person *pPerson; //This is a pointer to a person-struct called pPerson
unsigned int count = 10;

pPerson = malloc( count * sizeof( person));
if( pPersion = NULL)  {
  printf( "Insufficient memory available\n" );
  exit(0);
}

...use pPerson...

free( pPerson);

neodeaths13-Nov-07 5:36

13-Nov-07 5:36

i see where the code is going however could you show me how i shoudl go if i wanted to append to the pointer?

i am thinking if i should create a temp space and reallocated the memory againa dn stores it back in.

how do you think i should do it? and again i would like to say i am doing c programming.

thx

jhwurmbach13-Nov-07 5:45

13-Nov-07 5:45

neodeaths wrote:
i am thinking if i should create a temp space and reallocated the memory againa dn stores it back in.

yes, that is the way to go. But there is a function to do that for you:
Use realloc()

To double the size use

pPerson = realloc( pPerson, 2*count);

pPerson would be changed - be sure to not hold any pointers to the old location.

neodeaths13-Nov-07 5:51

13-Nov-07 5:51

so reallocate would do the work of allocating the new memory i want to use for me? what about the old one do i need to free the memory myself?

also would the reallocated memory contain my old infomation or do i still have to store it away into a temp and put it back?

jhwurmbach13-Nov-07 5:54

13-Nov-07 5:54

Hey, you definitely need to read a book on C ("Brian W. Kernighan, Dennis Ritchie: The C programming language" comes to mind) and MSDN!

neodeaths13-Nov-07 6:03

13-Nov-07 6:03

i read some tutorial on c programming but i wanted to apply dynamic memory allocation on struct rather then string array as i think it is more useful that way.

i guess that dynamic memory array is eassier to learn and maybe i should not jump stright into learning how to do dynamic memory allocation on struct so soon.

jhwurmbach13-Nov-07 6:06

13-Nov-07 6:06

neodeaths wrote:
maybe i should not jump stright into dynamic memory allocation

Maybe.
But in the meantime, just using the information at your fingertips (MS ad in the nineties, shortly after Bill Gates had invented the internet) would suffice:
Look up what MSDN[^] says about realloc[^].

neodeaths13-Nov-07 6:11

13-Nov-07 6:11

thanks for your help and all those who bothered to read my question i think it will really helpme in my progress of learning

David Crow13-Nov-07 5:55

13-Nov-07 5:55

neodeaths wrote:
so reallocate would do the work of allocating the new memory i want to use for me?

Yes.

neodeaths wrote:
what about the old one do i need to free the memory myself?

No.

neodeaths wrote:
also would the reallocated memory contain my old infomation...

Yes.

"Normal is getting dressed in clothes that you buy for work and driving through traffic in a car that you are still paying for, in order to get to the job you need to pay for the clothes and the car and the house you leave vacant all day so you can afford to live in it." - Ellen Goodman

"To have a respect for ourselves guides our morals; to have deference for others governs our manners." - Laurence Sterne

neodeaths13-Nov-07 17:11

13-Nov-07 17:11

i was just wondering this:
if i wanted to find the size of the array which is pointed by the pointer for my struct.
how should i go about it?

as you see i tryed the .lenght and sizeof() how ever it keep returning the size of the pointer instead of the array.

the purpose i am trying to do this is because i figured that if i am gonna manipulate the memory during runtime, finding out the size of the array while Only the array infomation would be useful.

please help with this question thx.

David Crow13-Nov-07 17:20

13-Nov-07 17:20

neodeaths wrote:
if i wanted to find the size of the array which is pointed by the pointer for my struct.
how should i go about it?

Keep that number in a global variable of some sort.

neodeaths13-Nov-07 17:57

13-Nov-07 17:57

yes i know that but i am just checking if there is a way to find the memory size of the whole array pointer?

if i could i could probably do a array_mem_size/sizeof(struct people)

David Crow14-Nov-07 2:26

14-Nov-07 2:26

neodeaths wrote:
if i could i could probably do a array_mem_size/sizeof(struct people)

This would only work for stack-based memory, not heap-based memory allocated with malloc().

neodeaths13-Nov-07 22:04

13-Nov-07 22:04

by the way i realise something wielrd when i i malloc to make the array have a size of 10.

and i try to access the 15th array by hardcoding the program still works do you know y?

David Crow14-Nov-07 2:23

14-Nov-07 2:23

neodeaths wrote:
do you know y?

Without seeing a code snippet, no.

Matthew Faithfull12-Nov-07 23:50

Matthew Faithfull

12-Nov-07 23:50

Perhaps you want something like this:-

<br />
//iCount is an int determined at runtime <br />
person* aPersons = new person[iCount];<br />
//..All code using aPersons goes here<br />
//Every new MUST be matched by a delete when you're done<br />
//In this case an array delete<br />
delete [] aPersons;<br />

Now you have an array of person structs and can use e.g. aPersons[iIndex].member to access a person in the array.
A more modern approach is to use container classes which dynamically size themselves. There are loads of these in the standard library std::list and std::vector are worth a look.

Nothing is exactly what it seems but everything with seems can be unpicked.

Cedric Moonen13-Nov-07 1:24

Cedric Moonen

13-Nov-07 1:24

Read the first line of his message: he is doing C programming, not C++ Wink | ;)

Cédric Moonen
Software developer

Charting control [v1.2]

ThatsAlok13-Nov-07 0:37

ThatsAlok

13-Nov-07 0:37

neodeaths wrote:
could anyone show me how to do a dynamic memory allocation on struct which can free me of having to state the array size?
i read some ebook saying i could use malloc but so far they used malloc on the string instead of struct.
thanks.

i prefer, stl::list/std::vector for this type of effort

"Opinions are neither right nor wrong. I cannot change your opinion. I can, however, change what influences your opinion." - David Crow
Never mind - my own stupidity is the source of every "problem" - Mixture

cheers,
Alok Gupta
VC Forum Q&A :- I/IV
Support CRY- Child Relief and You

Iain Clarke, Warrior Programmer

Iain Clarke, Warrior Programmer13-Nov-07 2:56

13-Nov-07 2:56

You fell into the same trap as Matthew Faithful - he's using C, not C++.
Otherwise, I'd totally agree with you.

Iain.