|
They have improved it. The hockey puck was laughed at even by Mac users.
regards,
Paul Watson
Ireland & South Africa
Andy Brummer wrote: Watson's law:
As an online discussion of cars grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving the Bugatti Veyron approaches one.
|
|
|
|
|
Why don't you get a different mouse? Why would anyone continue to use a mouse that hurt they're hand...or a mouse that they couldn't figure out how to use?
★ Shane Shepherd
|
|
|
|
|
Shane Shepherd wrote: Why don't you get a different mouse?
Because I don't use a Mac, and that was my experience when I had to use a Mac at my son's school for a couple hours.
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
Interesting that you condemn an entire line of computers based on your 2 hour experience with 10 year old technology (the hockey-puck mouse was introduced in 1998).
★ Shane Shepherd
|
|
|
|
|
Shane Shepherd wrote: Interesting that you condemn an entire line of computers based on your 2 hour experience with 10 year old technology
Hey, you gotta go with what you're good at. 
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
LoL...ok, I'll buy that. 
★ Shane Shepherd
|
|
|
|
|
Right, certainly not better for me. That assertion should be stricken from the question.
|
|
|
|
|
...but the entire .NET framework, in addition to the superb IDE that is Visual Studio, make it tough to switch. No matter how good the interfaces of other computers are, the development tools in .NET are top notch.
Not to mention, the XNA framework really has my interest.
|
|
|
|
|
BrandonWaskiewicz wrote: but the entire .NET framework, in addition to the superb IDE that is Visual Studio, make it tough to switch.
Parallels or Fusion on an Intel Mac enable use of Windows applications on the OS X desktop using virtualisation. Get the benefits of the OS X interface AND MS development tools...
|
|
|
|
|
One of the primary factors that draws me to Windows is the XNA framework. Parallels would be nice, except that I don't think the native hardware support is advanced enough to handle developing something with XNA on Parallels.
In addition to that, it seems kind of weird to work in Visual Studio, on Windows, but through Parallels on a Mac. So you are basically paying more for the Mac, but not using any of parts that make the Mac cost more. If I used Parallels, I think would be doing everything in Windows. So then what would the point of even having a Mac?
|
|
|
|
|
BrandonWaskiewicz wrote: superb IDE that is Visual Studio
You are lacking comparison, aren't you?
Let's think the unthinkable, let's do the undoable, let's prepare to grapple with the ineffable itself, and see if we may not eff it after all.
Douglas Adams, "Dirk Gently's Holistic Detective Agency"
|
|
|
|
|
Well Eclipse is nice, but Java doesn't really have the draw to me, since in my spare time I like to do game stuff. Java would be great for just 2d, but .NET is far more advanced for 3d stuff, with XNA.
For the Apple development stuff, I have heard good things, but not nearly as much talk as for Eclipse and Visual Studio. Plus, I would have to code in Objective C, and I have gotten quite used to having the benefits of an interpreted language 
|
|
|
|
|
BrandonWaskiewicz wrote: I would have to code in Objective C, and I have gotten quite used to having the benefits of an interpreted language
Objective C now has complete garbage collection, plus properties. However, while I haven't used xcode 3, the previous versions blew chunks compared to Visual Studio, in terms of being able to get work done, especially when it came to debugging (although in all fairness that's partly out of Apple's hands because they are using GDB which is a sucky base for a debugger).
¡El diablo está en mis pantalones! ¡Mire, mire!
Real Mentats use only 100% pure, unfooled around with Sapho Juice(tm)!
SELECT * FROM User WHERE Clue > 0
0 rows returned
Save an Orange - Use the VCF!
VCF Blog
|
|
|
|
|
i think that apple laptop are the best on market!
they are cool, strong, compact and very pretty!
but i hate macos!!
i probably will buy an apple laptop when my dell laptop died but only if i could install a microsoft os (not by a virtual machine) and only if i'm sure of full compatibility!
i think that using intel cpu is the greatest thing that apple has ever done!!
|
|
|
|
|
giammin wrote: i probably will buy an apple laptop when my dell laptop died but only if i could install a microsoft os (not by a virtual machine) and only if i'm sure of full compatibility!
BootCamp runs Windows XP/Vista on Mac hardware. Works nicely, no VM needed.
regards,
Paul Watson
Ireland & South Africa
Andy Brummer wrote: Watson's law:
As an online discussion of cars grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving the Bugatti Veyron approaches one.
|
|
|
|
|
I run both Mac OS and Vista on my MacBook Pro. Best laptop ever.
Raul Macias
|
|
|
|
|
MOHIT Jain
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cry all you want, you'll never ever get the answer here.
WPF - Imagineers Wanted
Follow your nose using DoubleAnimationUsingPath
|
|
|
|
|
I'm not interested in Macs as surely Mac users are not interested in PC's.
This CPU convergence brought some stability between the two "worlds" but not enough, at least not yet.
If you're a XP or Vista user you'll be able to buy a better computer at the same price if it's not a Mac.
It's not worth the price, at least not yet.
|
|
|
|
|
That's total nonsense. I used Windows since 3.11, and didn't like it until XP, which was functional and stable, especially compared to the crashaholic Windows 98.
And I've used Linux since Red Hat in 1998, and still have an up-to-date Ubuntu Gutsy on my desktop at home.
Then I got a Macbook a couple of weeks ago (it shipped with Tiger, but I complained to Apple and they sent out a copy of Leopard for free).
The hardware works, it's a fast and efficient machine and operating system, and more and more ports are appearing from apps in the Linux world. And it only cost a little more than what I paid for my last Acer laptop, which is an oversized, overweight mammoth which sounds like an airplane taking off constantly.
You may not be interested in Macs, but I don't see any real reason for it other than that you have no real knowledge of the platform.
As a new Mac user, I would guess that Mac users have every reason not to be bothered with PCs. Except in my case, as a programmer, I'll keep my mind open and my feet in both worlds.
Don't be closed-minded.
|
|
|
|
|
Re: self ranting
...Although, to be fair, I do take issue with Apple taking the responsibility of writing the Java VM for OS X, and being a year late with Java 6 so far.
This is causing some consternation and threats to jump ship from Java developers using Macs, but I'm hopefully they'll either sort it out soon or hand the job over to the capable Sun.
But honestly, try using a Mac for a week or so. Spotlight and the like make things so much smoother. Plus you've got your Unix shell, tools and scripting.
As a longtime Linux user (Redhat, Slackware, Mandrake/Mandriva, Ubuntu), it's like all the good parts of Linux minus the horrifying hardware incompatibility, weird bugs and inefficient implementations (e.g. the popular window managers seem slow, at least on my home machine).
Although it's missing something like apt-get, so far as I can see.
|
|
|
|
|
No offense mate... I just think that for a Windows user it only worths for the look.
And btw, ACER is the lowest you can get on branded laptops. They have the best quality/price relation but you can't expect much from it when it comes to quality (battery, noise, chassis, etc...).
Although it's possible to run Vista on a Mac I don't feel comfortable with it, so I won't buy one.
O prefer to have a native Vista computer with Linux and even MacOS VM's that a Mac with Windows VM's.
"especially compared to the crashaholic Windows 98"
Do you call Windows 98 crashaholic?! What about ME? 
Congrats on your new Mac,
Cheers
|
|
|
|
|
> And btw, ACER is the lowest you can get on branded laptops.
> They have the best quality/price relation but you can't
> expect much from it when it comes to quality (battery,
> noise, chassis, etc...).
You're absolutely right here; that thing runs for maybe 40 minutes on batteries, if I'm lucky...
Also, I killed it soon after buying it by flashing a newer BIOS onto it; turned out it was for another revision of the SAME model motherboard - obviously this wasn't mentioned in any way in the BIOS docs.
And of course, they apparently had no way to recover, nor to remove the flash BIOS since it was hard soldered rather than socketed. Cost me €350 or so from the Acer repair centre to get a whole new motherboard.
So not much chance of me ever buying from Acer again!
|
|
|
|
|
The hardware doesn't make the difference but the OS make a big one. I'm using both, and trust me, OSX is way more user friendly than windows. And OSX require less resource to work properly.
You should try and after that make your conclusion.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
