|
This[^] article may be a good place to start.
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
yes, this is a ASP.NET and try to create a cookie on the project and it is on live within two weeks. thank you for ur answer cokkie wil be cookie to client.
thank you
|
|
|
|
|
The answer you seek is here[^].
|
|
|
|
|
Dave Kreskowiak wrote: Let's see. 2 sticks butter (softened), flour, baking soda, a couple eggs, pinch of salt, sugar, brown suger, a bit of vanilla extract, chocolate chips...
[homer simpson] mmmmmmm, cooooooookies [/homer simpson]
"The clue train passed his station without stopping." - John Simmons / outlaw programmer
|
|
|
|
|
can any one suggest me gud interview questions list with answers?
|
|
|
|
|
Q: Tell me about yourself.
A: I have issues going to
Google to look stuff up.
Hogan
|
|
|
|
|
Q) What is the answer to the ultimate question of life, the universe, and everything?
A) 42
|
|
|
|
|
Q: Please explain recursion?
A: I would explain it recursively if I could explain it recursively.
|
|
|
|
|
I have never received the same set of questions at any interview I was at. However, there are some standard ones that you are likely to get such as: How are you? How was your journey? and so on.
The interview process my company uses includes a technical test where we ask you to write some software. You get given a PC with Visual Studio and some common tools on it and a specification. You have two hours - we don't expect you to complete everything, but what we are looking for is how you coped with the problem, how you structured your code, and so on. It is an "open book" test and you have access to the internet so you can use what ever resources are there.
We have found it helps eliminate those that are incapable of writing software or have exagerated their experience with the technology.
Because that test is quite intense we are considering adding a quick eliminator in the intial interview along the lines of the Buzz-Fizz problem described in Hanselminutes a few months ago.
Upcoming events:
* Glasgow: Mock Objects, SQL Server CLR Integration, Reporting Services, db4o, Dependency Injection with Spring ...
"I wouldn't say boo to a goose. I'm not a coward, I just realise that it would be largely pointless."
My website
|
|
|
|
|
Colin Angus Mackay wrote: You get given a PC with Visual Studio and some common tools on it and a specification.
Do they get access to Google?
|
|
|
|
|
dino2094 wrote: Do they get access to Google?
Yes. 'It is an "open book" test and you have access to the internet so you can use what ever resources are there.'
Although, I should clarify that my company uses WebSense so it won't allow access to bebo, porn or BBC News.
Upcoming events:
* Glasgow: Mock Objects, SQL Server CLR Integration, Reporting Services, db4o, Dependency Injection with Spring ...
"I wouldn't say boo to a goose. I'm not a coward, I just realise that it would be largely pointless."
My website
|
|
|
|
|
Colin Angus Mackay wrote: porn or BBC News
Similar sites, huh? 
|
|
|
|
|
There was an excellent Dilbert cartoon about a week ago that I'd post a link to - but I can't access it.
Upcoming events:
* Glasgow: Mock Objects, SQL Server CLR Integration, Reporting Services, db4o, Dependency Injection with Spring ...
"I wouldn't say boo to a goose. I'm not a coward, I just realise that it would be largely pointless."
My website
|
|
|
|
|
Every interview I've had asks for an explaination of polymorphism. And almost all interviewers aren't qualified to determine if my answer is "correct" according to what's on the clip board. And I've developed some pretty good answers with so much practice at answering that one.
|
|
|
|
|
Who knows what kind of questions you'll be asked? If you are the interviewee, put the ball back in the interviewer's court by asking questions about the company. This can show the interrviewer than you may have a genuine interest in the company and not just the job you are interviewing for.
"The clue train passed his station without stopping." - John Simmons / outlaw programmer
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I want to access the fileds and change their properties at run time according to different condition. How it is possible? Can anyone do that or have any idea about it.
Thanks
Syed Shahid Hussain
|
|
|
|
|
Are they formula fields? If so you just need to right-click them and hit edit formula..then put insert the formulas in the editor.
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry,
I know that solution but my point of intrest is run time access not at design Time. I want the field at run time. Available to me (in code).
HAVE YOU ANY IDEA ABOUT IT?????
WAITING.... 
Syed Shahid Hussain
|
|
|
|
|
I developed an Installer using C# set up project. Now when i try to repair it instead of removing it, still it removes the product. what can i do so - when i say it to repair, it will repair the software?
Chayan
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry to ask a new question so soon , I managed to get the xml working now ive got a simple question im sure ive done this before but im getting confused with my actionscript .
so ive got CurrentStatus.InnerText = "Away"; now im just trying to remember how to create a vaeriable like i would in actionscript string i think it is
CurrentStatus.InnerText = Value;
and then value = "away" in the button click events
gah i cant belive ive forgotton this sorry
|
|
|
|
|
That sounds just about right.
-Larantz-
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
Has anyone written or have found code that creates a Queue(FIFO) and Stack(FILO) class without using System.Collections (1.1) and without using generics(2.0)
Any sample code will be much appreciated.
Thanks
happy coding!
|
|
|
|
|
Why don't you want to use the built-in types? The non-generic collections are implemented in mscorlib.dll, which you cannot build a .NET program without referencing, so in effect they're 'free'. Generic collections are implemented in System.dll, but it's almost impossible not to use some functionality from this assembly, so again it's effectively free.
Both classes are based on arrays, so if you grow the stack or queue beyond the largest size you've previously used you will incur some time cost as it allocates a new array and copies the elements from the old to the new array.
If you just want to study the code for these classes, get the Shared Source version from here[^].
|
|
|
|
|
Mike Dimmick wrote: Why don't you want to use the built-in types?
I imagine he doesn't want to use the built in classes as his homework question started with
"Without using the built in classes...."
"More functions should disregard input values and just return 12. It would make life easier." - comment posted on WTF
|
|
|
|
|
Once upon a time there was no .NET and people used to create their own data structures
(such as linked lists) in whatever language they preferred or had available.
now there is .NET and a lot of fancy programming languages, and yes you still can
create linked lists: come up with a Node class, and let one Node point to the next
(and maybe also to the previous one); then design a Push() and a Pop() method, et voila
you have either a Queue or a Stack.
Alternatively, create an ArrayList class yourself: use an array, and if an Add() operation
would exceed the array's length, allocate a new and larger one, copy the data and move on.
And then turn that ArrayList into a Stack (it would not serve well in a Queue).
No big deal, no magic involved.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
