|
gunkel wrote: 1. The sender field cannot be set. (It's always empty)
Probably because you've not set it to anything. Use the SetSentOnBehalfOfName() method.
"A good athlete is the result of a good and worthy opponent." - David Crow
"To have a respect for ourselves guides our morals; to have deference for others governs our manners." - Laurence Sterne
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks so far. Actually in my VC++ 2005 with Outlook 2007 its called PutSentOnBehalfOfName(). Why is that? Just curious...
Anyway, the message ist still an "unsent message", which allows the user to edit and sent it. A functionaly that brings me into troubles. Any ideas?
|
|
|
|
|
gunkel wrote: Anyway, the message ist still an "unsent message", which allows the user to edit and sent it.
"Sent" messages really only exist on the recipient's machine, rather than on the machine in which they were created. In general, there are three different types of messages: sent, posted, and saved. Sent messages are traditional e-mail messages sent to a recipient. Posted messages are created in a public folder. Saved messages, which is what you have, are created and saved without either sending or posting.
gunkel wrote: A functionaly that brings me into troubles.
Why?
"A good athlete is the result of a good and worthy opponent." - David Crow
"To have a respect for ourselves guides our morals; to have deference for others governs our manners." - Laurence Sterne
|
|
|
|
|
I am trying to notify the user about events of my application by placing an item in his outlook inbox. This has to look just like an e-mail that has arrived via a POP-account. (I cannot send it via POP3 or the like, because the notifications have to be instantaneous.)
Because:
1. this must be read-only. (currently not the case)
2. the user must be able to use the reply function in Outlook. (currently not the case)
Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
i just want to know how to write ftp programs using win32 C style... also how to write networking programs using win32 api's... so i can upload my files automatically at some specific interval to the server...
|
|
|
|
|
Please have a look at MSDN.
Regards,
Paresh.
|
|
|
|
|
Jayapal Chandran wrote: i just want to know how to write ftp programs using win32 C style
Have a look at this[^] it can be very useful (if you wish to buy it.
And for a FTP server have a look at this[^] (it's free for personal use)
The only programmers that are better than C programmers are those who code in 1's and 0's..... 
Programm3r
My Blog: ^_^
|
|
|
|
|
Jayapal Chandran wrote: i just want to know how to write ftp programs using win32 C style...so i can upload my files automatically at some specific interval to the server.
How about FtpPutFile()?
"A good athlete is the result of a good and worthy opponent." - David Crow
"To have a respect for ourselves guides our morals; to have deference for others governs our manners." - Laurence Sterne
|
|
|
|
|
how to set password to mdb file,programatically..??
thanks in before
|
|
|
|
|
See here.
"A good athlete is the result of a good and worthy opponent." - David Crow
"To have a respect for ourselves guides our morals; to have deference for others governs our manners." - Laurence Sterne
|
|
|
|
|
Is it possible to check how many variable arguments are passed to a function?
Best regards
Hansjörg
|
|
|
|
|
No, when using ellipsis to pass arguments you should always give the number of arguments,
or a way to get them like sprintf.
codito ergo sum
|
|
|
|
|
Have a look here[^].
"It's supposed to be hard, otherwise anybody could do it!" - selfquote
"High speed never compensates for wrong direction!" - unknown
|
|
|
|
|
May be that I have missed something. but here I don't can find something about the number of arguments...
|
|
|
|
|
The sample shows how you can implement functions with a variable number of arguments using C.
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
|
|
|
|
|
HOw this works I know. But I need a way to know the number of variable arguments. Because if no one are used, I want to optimize the function...it's a lot faster.
Best regards
Hansjörg
|
|
|
|
|
if optimization is your concern, then avoid to use variable number of arguments (or use a mechanism such as the main one, i.e. an array of arguments and its length passed to your function).
BTW, referring to the MSDN sample (link given by Roger Stoltz) [^], nothing prevents you to use the marker to indicate the total number of arguments: does this fit your needs?
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
|
|
|
|
|
The marker is not so a good was i think...
The problem is that it is not possible to define 2 methods in a class (same name). One with variable length parameter and one without...This would be the best solution for me too...
I want to make a logger class in this way...
class Logger{
void Log(LPCSTR format,...);
void Log(LPCSTR message);
}
something like that. It is easier for the user to have allways the same name...Do you know any solution for that? arrays are also not so good..it's not easy to use...
if not I have to give the function another name.... 
Best regards
hansjörg
|
|
|
|
|
hansipet wrote: Do you know any solution for that?
No.
BTW, why don't you emulate the behaviour of cout instead of the one of printf?
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
|
|
|
|
|
This would be a great solution...but how I can do this?
|
|
|
|
|
The tricky part is customizing the >> operator. Have a look, for instance, at this article http://www.codeproject.com/cpp/Encoder.asp[^].
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you...I will check this..
|
|
|
|
|
If you're using this for logging purposes, why don't use CString::FormatV()?
Like this:
void <YourClassName>::Log( LPTSTR pText, ... )
{
CString LogText;
va_list args;
va_start( args, pText );
LogText.FormatV( pText, args );
}This would make the function call similar to printf().
"It's supposed to be hard, otherwise anybody could do it!" - selfquote
"High speed never compensates for wrong direction!" - unknown
|
|
|
|
|
I think this is in the MFC library and I don't can use it...
|
|
|
|
|
hansipet wrote: I think this is in the MFC library and I don't can use it...
Ok, then use vsprintf(). See here[^].
It works the same as the CString alternative, but in this case you have to provide the output buffer.
"It's supposed to be hard, otherwise anybody could do it!" - selfquote
"High speed never compensates for wrong direction!" - unknown
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
