|
Jaiprakash M Bankolli wrote: You certainly can't talk about how people will behave ... You talk about yourself not for others !!
What put you in such a foul mood?
|
|
|
|
|
"What put you in such a foul mood?"
I never felt it is foul mood !! Strange 
Regards,
Jaiprakash M Bankolli
jaiprakash.bankolli@gmail.com
Blog: http://jaiprakash.blog.com/
Suggestions: http://jaitoimprove.blog.com/
|
|
|
|
|
Some of your posts show that you are in a "foul mood". It also looks like you have been voting down anyone who disagrees with you. That is very childish.
|
|
|
|
|
Nope I don't feel what you are saying is correct. I felt using "foul mood" statement itself was childish .
Regards,
Jaiprakash M Bankolli
jaiprakash.bankolli@gmail.com
Blog: http://jaiprakash.blog.com/
Suggestions: http://jaitoimprove.blog.com/
|
|
|
|
|
Jaiprakash M Bankolli wrote: Nope I don't feel what you are saying is correct. I felt using "foul mood" statement itself was childish
Your overuse of exclamation marks does suggest that you are in some way angry or upset by the comments. Interesting that you don't deny voting people down.
|
|
|
|
|
"Your overuse of exclamation marks does suggest that you are in some way angry or upset by the comments"
overuse of exclamation : Let me tell you something that is my style of writting, so that doesn't mean that am angry in any sense
"Interesting that you don't deny voting people down."
That is because I want people to vote irrespective of whether I get good votes or poor votes
Regards,
Jaiprakash M Bankolli
jaiprakash.bankolli@gmail.com
Blog: http://jaiprakash.blog.com/
Suggestions: http://jaitoimprove.blog.com/
|
|
|
|
|
Jaiprakash M Bankolli wrote: veruse of exclamation : Let me tell you something that is my style of writting, so that doesn't mean that am angry in any sense
If people don't know the style of your writing, how are they meant to tell? I certainly interpreted what you were saying as being in an angry tone. Perhaps you need to alter the style of your writing so that you don't use exclamation marks when you are in a debate or discussion with someone.
|
|
|
|
|
You can't comment on the style in which people write, you should try to take the message from the post. This site is being visited by users groups situated in various countries so if you feel or interpret message in your way and have some thoughts, then I would suggest you should get it clarified rather then trying to improve others style of writting
Regards,
Jaiprakash M Bankolli
jaiprakash.bankolli@gmail.com
Blog: http://jaiprakash.blog.com/
Suggestions: http://jaitoimprove.blog.com/
|
|
|
|
|
Jaiprakash M Bankolli wrote: You can't comment
Oh, we're back to that old chestnut.
I can comment. I can comment on anything I like. You don't have to agree. But as I'm the one that is interpreting your words I am uniquely placed to comment on them. I am the only person on this earth that can tell you how I interpret your words. I can extrapolate and suggest that others are likely to interpret them in the same way.
Jaiprakash M Bankolli wrote: I would suggest you should get it clarified rather then trying to improve others style of writting
If I spent all my time clarifing other people's words nothing would ever get done. If you write effectively then I won't have to clarify anything.
Jaiprakash M Bankolli wrote: This site is being visited by users groups situated in various countries
Absolutely, so it the writer would stick to generally held standards and conventions then we would all get along much better.
Any I notice that you appear to be voting people down again... 
|
|
|
|
|
Ok cool, Do as you like friend !! You are also voting people down
Regards,
Jaiprakash M Bankolli
jaiprakash.bankolli@gmail.com
Blog: http://jaiprakash.blog.com/
Suggestions: http://jaitoimprove.blog.com/
|
|
|
|
|
Actually, I haven't been. However, if you'd like I can vote you down for your last few posts?
|
|
|
|
|
Do whatever you like !!!
Regards,
Jaiprakash M Bankolli
jaiprakash.bankolli@gmail.com
Blog: http://jaiprakash.blog.com/
Suggestions: http://jaitoimprove.blog.com/
|
|
|
|
|
Happy now?
Isn't being childish so wonderful  
|
|
|
|
|
If that make you happy then be happy ), I don't care what you do huh
Regards,
Jaiprakash M Bankolli
jaiprakash.bankolli@gmail.com
Blog: http://jaiprakash.blog.com/
Suggestions: http://jaitoimprove.blog.com/
|
|
|
|
|
Obviously you do. Otherwise you wouldn't continue to reply.
|
|
|
|
|
I think you have some problem, consult a doctor. You message don't make any sense. If you have no other work then reply else stop it at once 
-- modified at 9:15 Thursday 26th April, 2007
Regards,
Jaiprakash M Bankolli
jaiprakash.bankolli@gmail.com
Blog: http://jaiprakash.blog.com/
Suggestions: http://jaitoimprove.blog.com/
|
|
|
|
|
You said: "I don't care what you do"
I replied that you obviously do (care what I do), otherwise you wouldn't keep replying to me.
Jaiprakash M Bankolli wrote: I think you have some problem, cosult doctor.
I'm not the one with the problem. You are the one voting everything down. I only voted down on invitation.
|
|
|
|
|
Hello!
I've got a problem with multithreading.
One should think that every Thread-Model causes overhead and is responsible
for a little bit lost of performance on a singel-Core CPU!
In my Case, the sequentiell version is about 3 % slower than the Threading-versions.
Has anybody an explanation for this?
//the worker-function
public void Function()
{
for (int i = 0; i < 10000; i++)
{
for (int j = 0; j < 10000; j++)
{
j = j + 1;
j = j - 1;
}
}
}
//Needed to set the AutoResetEvent -> Overhead?
public void FunctionNT(Object obj)
{
Function();
Object tmp = obj;
if (tmp != null)
{
((AutoResetEvent)obj).Set();
}
}
// sequentiell Version
class SequentiellTest : ThreadingParent
{
public SequentiellTest(int piterations)
{
this.iterations = piterations;
}
public void Run()
{
Worker wrk = new Worker();
for (int i = 0; i < iterations; i++)
{
wrk.Function();
}
}
}
// Version newThread
class NewThreadTest : ThreadingParent
{
public NewThreadTest(int piterations)
{
this.iterations = piterations;
}
public void Run()
{
AutoResetEvent[] ready = new AutoResetEvent[iterations];// = new AutoResetEvent(false);
Worker wrk = new Worker();
Thread[] tda = new Thread[iterations];
for (int i = 0; i < iterations; i++)
{
ready[i] = new AutoResetEvent(false);
tda[i] = new Thread(wrk.FunctionNT);
tda[i].Start(ready[i]);
}
//wait until all Threads are Ready
for (int j = 0; j < iterations; j++)
{
ready[j].WaitOne();
}
}
}
// Example for a Calling-Function
private void NewThreadStart()
{
//start the Stopwatch
stp.Start();
//Init NewThreadClass
NewThreadTest ntt = new NewThreadTest(Convert.ToInt16(tbIterations.Text));
ntt.Run();
//Stop the Stopwatch
stp.Stop();
}
|
|
|
|
|
Hi all..
I need to know what is meant by satellite assembly..and what is the purpose of it..?
Regards,
Balaguru
|
|
|
|
|
Try Googling it!
Trinity: Neo... nobody has ever done this before.
Neo: That's why it's going to work.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi..
Tell me the exact definition if u know..I know that i can get if from google but i couldn't do it due to certain issues..Help in this regard..
Regards,
Balaguru
|
|
|
|
|
|
For me satellite assembly mean is when you create an application using feature like globalistion and localisation, create resource to extract region specific information. In this senerio the assemblies behave according to region ....
Regards,
Jaiprakash M Bankolli
jaiprakash.bankolli@gmail.com
http://jaiprakash.blog.com/
|
|
|
|
|
Hi guys,
I find (especially in .NET 1.1) that many UI type classes are kept "sealed". Any specific reason for that?
Examples: Classes like Tooltip, Progressbar etc.
Typcially, UI classes are supposed to be extensible. I can understand if 3rd party vendors keep their UI classes sealed (for more business oppurtunity  ) and therefore only provide developers to extended the functionality by providing properties or other extension mechanisms like interfaces on the controls/components (for custom rendering of the component) etc.
But why would Framework providers like Microsoft, keep their (of course, not all!) UI classes sealed?
|
|
|
|
|
One particular reason is so that you can't end up doing something that breaks the underlying object. Bear in mind that some of the controls are effectively wrappers for API calls you can appreciate that it would be very easy for you to do something that just broke them.
Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
