|
|
I am not kidding. Project is big. Lots of components. I need them all. The path names are long themsleves too. SUBST cant be used because the idea is to copy the project on another machine and it should work without doing subst there.
I have seen this problem reported before but did not find any solution. I know its ridiculous but this is the situation! Anyone who knows how to deal with this problem is welcome!
|
|
|
|
|
Consider this example:
Suppose your projects are setup in the following paths:
c:\MyProjects\common\include
c:\MyProjects\DLLs\DllProject1\include
c:\MyProjects\DLLs\DllProject2\include
c:\MyProjects\Project1\include
Lets suppose Project1 needs the includes from DLLProject1, DLLProject2, and common\include.
You could enter the include paths for Project1 using relative paths, relative to the Project1 project folder. Using the above example, your include path could be:
.\include;..\common\include;..\Dlls\DllProject1\include;..\Dlls\DllProject2\include
Alternatively, you might be able to use evironment variables (macros) in the include path. What you could do is define environment variables that define common directory paths into a single macro.
Using this technique, you could define these environment variables.
SET PROJECTBASE="C:\MyProjects\"
SET COMMONINCLUDE="%PROJECTBASE%common\include"
SET DLLBASE="%PROJECTBASE%DLLs"
Your include path would be:
.\include;$(COMMONINCLUDE);$(DLLBASE)\DLLProject1\include;$(DLLBASE)\DLLProject2\include;
The basic idea is to merge as many common folders into a single macro.
The IDE will automatically expand the $(<environment variable>) macros as needed. Using this technique makes it real easy to move your projects from one folder to the other without having to tweak each of the projects. You just have to adjust the environment variables.
I hope this information helps you or at least gives you ideas on how you can solve your include path problems.
This subject could be a good idea for a beginners article here on CP.
|
|
|
|
|
Hai..
Iam using SHFileoperation to copy folders..
While copying those i need to show progress bar.I was able to do that upto some extent by using FOF_SAMPLEPROGRESS.
But in this it is not showing the file names which are being copied.
How to show the file names in the progress dialogbox??Can any one help me out..
Thanks in advance.
Regards
vijay
|
|
|
|
|
Vjys wrote: FOF_SAMPLEPROGRESS.
Its this flag causing it, have you seen its MSDN description ? It says,
Display a progress dialog box but do not show the file names.
Can you show code, what you are doing ?
-- modified at 6:46 Friday 30th March, 2007
This code just work perfect for me,
SHFILEOPSTRUCT sfo;
sfo.hwnd = NULL;
sfo.wFunc = FO_COPY;
sfo.pFrom = _T("F:\\FromFolder\0");
sfo.pTo = _T("c:\\TargetFolder\0");
sfo.fFlags = NULL;
SHFileOperation(&sfo);
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for reply..
The code is working perfectly 4 me..almost similar to you...
Are you getting the file names in the progress dialog box..
Ya i used FOF_SAMPLEPROGRESS, it is without file names.
I want with the file names.Generally we will get the file names also, right when we are copying files.
How to get it??
Thanks.
Regards
vijay
|
|
|
|
|
Vjys wrote: How to get it??
I guess, you have not seen previous post, which I modified already.
|
|
|
|
|
SHFILEOPSTRUCT SHFileOp;
ZeroMemory(&SHFileOp, sizeof(SHFILEOPSTRUCT));
SHFileOp.hwnd = NULL;
SHFileOp.wFunc = FO_COPY;
sPath+='\0';
SHFileOp.pFrom=sPath;
DestPath+='\0';
SHFileOp.pTo = DestPath;
SHFileOp.fFlags = FOF_NOCONFIRMMKDIR|FOF_SIMPLEPROGRESS;
//The Copying Function
SHFileOperation(&SHFileOp);
Ya this is the code..in it sPath & Destpath are var strings..
Regards
vijay
|
|
|
|
|
I asked you to remove FOF_SIMPLEPROGRESS flag. Definitely , you have not read my first reply.
Your code should be like this,
SHFILEOPSTRUCT SHFileOp;
ZeroMemory(&SHFileOp, sizeof(SHFILEOPSTRUCT));
SHFileOp.hwnd = NULL;
SHFileOp.wFunc = FO_COPY;
sPath+='\0';
SHFileOp.pFrom=sPath;
DestPath+='\0';
SHFileOp.pTo = DestPath;
SHFileOp.fFlags = FOF_NOCONFIRMMKDIR;
SHFileOperation(&SHFileOp);
And use <pre> tags , while posting the code.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanku..Thanku very much..its working...
bye...
Regards
vijay
|
|
|
|
|
Have a look at the
typedef struct _SHFILEOPSTRUCT {
HWND hwnd;
UINT wFunc;
LPCTSTR pFrom;
LPCTSTR pTo;
FILEOP_FLAGS fFlags;
BOOL fAnyOperationsAborted;
LPVOID hNameMappings;
LPCTSTR lpszProgressTitle;
} SHFILEOPSTRUCT, *LPSHFILEOPSTRUCT;
structure.
I.E:
wFunc
Value that indicates which operation to perform. This member can be one of the following values.
FO_COPY
Copy the files specified in the pFrom member to the location specified in the pTo member.
FO_DELETE
Delete the files specified in pFrom.
FO_MOVE
Move the files specified in pFrom to the location specified in pTo.
FO_RENAME
Rename the file specified in pFrom. You cannot use this flag to rename multiple files with a single function call. Use FO_MOVE instead.
Have a look Here[^]
Regards,
The only programmers that are better than C programmers are those who code in 1's and 0's..... 
Programm3r
My Blog: ^_^
|
|
|
|
|
prasad_som wrote: SHFILEOPSTRUCT sfo;sfo.hwnd = NULL;sfo.wFunc = FO_COPY;sfo.pFrom = _T("F:\\FromFolder\0");sfo.pTo = _T("c:\\TargetFolder\0");sfo.fFlags = NULL;SHFileOperation(&sfo);
Thanx prasad that helped me aswell, can the same be applied to files ??? To show file cpoy progress.
Many Thanx
Regards,
The only programmers that are better than C programmers are those who code in 1's and 0's.....
Programm3r
My Blog: ^_^
|
|
|
|
|
Programm3r wrote: can the same be applied to files ???
Yes,
FOF_ALLOWUNDO Preserve Undo information, if possible. If pFrom does not contain fully qualified path and
filenames, this flag is ignored.
FOF_CONFIRMMOUSE Not currently implemented.
FOF_FILESONLY Perform the operation on files only if a wildcard file name (*.*) is specified.
FOF_MULTIDESTFILES The pTo member specifies multiple destination files
(one for each source file) rather than one directory where all source files are to be deposited.
FOF_NOCONFIRMATION Respond with Yes to All for any dialog box that is displayed.
FOF_NOCONFIRMMKDIR Does not confirm the creation of a new directory if the operation requires one to be created.
FOF_NOCOPYSECURITYATTRIBS Version 4.71. Microsoft® Windows NT® only. The security attributes of the file
will not be copied.
FOF_NOERRORUI No user interface will be displayed if an error occurs.
FOF_RENAMEONCOLLISION Give the file being operated on a new name in a move, copy, or rename operation
if a file with the target name already exists.
FOF_SILENT Does not display a progress dialog box.
FOF_SIMPLEPROGRESS Displays a progress dialog box but does not show the file names.
FOF_WANTMAPPINGHANDLE If FOF_RENAMEONCOLLISION is specified, the hNameMappings member will be filled in
if any files were renamed.
Regards,
The only programmers that are better than C programmers are those who code in 1's and 0's.....
Programm3r
My Blog: ^_^
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hi all:
As we all know messages must involve with specific window's handle, but I come across a requirement that there's no window handle available, but still I want a sub thread to send a WM_QUIT(PostQuitMessage(...)) message to main thread, in order to stop the main thread's
while (GetMessage(&msg, NULL, 0, 0))<br />
{<br />
TranslateMessage(&msg);<br />
DispatchMessage(&msg);<br />
}<br />
Send a PostQuitMessage from sub thread doesn't seem to work.
|
|
|
|
|
cant you use PostThreadMessage()?
nave
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks, But how can I get the main thread's ID.
|
|
|
|
|
simple
AfxGetApp()->PostThreadMessage( WM_QUIT, 0, 0 );
nave
|
|
|
|
|
LiYS wrote: requirement that there's no window handle available, but still I want a sub thread to send a WM_QUIT(PostQuitMessage(...)) message to main thread,
To send message you should have a window handle, to send message to that specific window. or you can broadcast the message but in your case its WM_QUIT, so you can not boardcast it. Better you can pass the window handle to the thread at the time its creation and use the handle to send the message
Do your Duty and Don't expect the Result
Rate this Post, if I helped You
|
|
|
|
|
This is all happened before CreateWindow
|
|
|
|
|
LiYS wrote: PostQuitMessage from sub thread doesn't seem to work
This would post WM_QUIT message to that threads(sub) message queue, if there is any.
So in this case you should follow suggestion by Naveen.
|
|
|
|
|
what about direct api call of PostQuitMessgae
|
|
|
|
|
Anyone out there have any good references on how to improve TCP/SSL performance on high latency connections.
We see bandwidth dropping radically as latency increases... would like to get rid of this issue.
I don't see much of anything in the socket options.
I also cannot switch away from TCP, am required to use SSL.
Oh, and I really cannot mess with the registry...
And am using OpenSSL for my SSL overhead.
Any thoughts to share?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~<br />
Peter Weyzen<br />
Staff Engineer<br />
<A HREF="http://www.soonr.com">SoonR Inc.</A>
|
|
|
|
|
Where/when is the latency, how are you measuring it, and where is it coming from?
Depending on when the latency occurs, it could definitely impact throughput.
Mark
"If you can dodge a wrench, you can dodge a ball."
|
|
|
|
|
It's not a measured thing unfortunately.
We have this client/server thingy. I am in California and the server is in California. I don't have much trouble with throughput.
But I have this user in Denmark who is trying to connect to the serer in California. He's got a soooper high speed connection to the internet... but can only get limited bandwidth between his client and our server.
I am very confident in his connection...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~<br />
Peter Weyzen<br />
Staff Engineer<br />
<A HREF="http://www.soonr.com">SoonR Inc.</A>
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
