|
As I understand it, you want a way to use this function without an exception being thrown?
I don't think that it is possible by using CodeAccessPermission. Take a look in Object Browser:
public void Demand()
Member of System.Security.CodeAccessPermission
Summary:
Forces a System.Security.SecurityException at run time if all callers higher in
the call stack have not been granted the permission specified by the current instance.
Exceptions:
System.Security.SecurityException: A caller higher in the call stack does not have
the permission specified by the current instance.-or- A caller higher in the call
stack has called System.Security.CodeAccessPermission.Deny() on the current permission
bject.
It behaves like it should. I hope I understood your question. I don't think it's possible to avoid the exception being thrown.
Visual Studio can't evaluate this, can you?
public object moo<br />
{<br />
__get { return moo; }<br />
__set { moo = value; }<br />
}
|
|
|
|
|
I have tried something like this, but not working :
conn.Open();
// i want all these values(in bold) in one variable to be displayed later(in a messagebox).
Is it possible to display these 5 values in one variable? how?
SqlCommand cmm = new SqlCommand("select url, sitehit, survey, tellafriend, addtooutlook from tblsummary", conn);
SqlDataAdapter ad = new SqlDataAdapter(cmm);
DataSet sd = new DataSet();
ad.Fill(sd, "tblsummary");
//string str = sd.Tables(0).Rows(0).Item(0);
//for (i = 0 To ds.Tables(0).Rows.Count)
for(int i = 0;i<=ds.Tables(0);i++)
{
string str = sd.Tables(0);
MessageBox.Show(str);
}
It is giving error at ".Rows(0)" (wich is commented).
Is it proper?
Thanx 4 d response in adv.
Regards nekshan.
|
|
|
|
|
conn.Open();
SqlCommand cmm = new SqlCommand("select url, sitehit, survey, tellafriend, addtooutlook from tblsummary", conn);
SqlDataAdapter ad = new SqlDataAdapter(cmm);
DataSet ds = new DataSet();
ad.Fill(ds, "tblsummary");
string str
Dim ds As DataSet1
if (ds.Tables(0).Rows.Count != 0)
{
string str ="";
Str = ds.Tables(0).Rows(0).Item(1).ToString(); ' i think item is starts from 0 if not work then write here 0 then 1 upto 4 ok.
str += ds.Tables(0).Rows(0).Item(2).ToString();
str += ds.Tables(0).Rows(0).Item(3).ToString();
str += ds.Tables(0).Rows(0).Item(4).ToString();
str += ds.Tables(0).Rows(0).Item(5).ToString();
}
MessageBox.Show(str);
run in debug mode with putting break point over this code so u get it better.
if it skip if condition then no row is coming from database ok so check query if not going in if condition.
replay me feedback after testing.
|
|
|
|
|
Nekshan wrote: //string str = sd.Tables(0).Rows(0).Item(0);
//for (i = 0 To ds.Tables(0).Rows.Count)
for(int i = 0;i<=ds.Tables(0);i++)
{
string str = sd.Tables(0);
MessageBox.Show(str);
}
Try changing () to [].
Nekshan wrote: string str = sd.Tables(0);
How can u assign table object to string ?
|
|
|
|
|
You can simplay conconate the output fild in sql query
like
select field1+field2+....+finldn as newfieldname from tablename
now you get only one value per row
then as same as you have done
Check it
I have not try but soure about it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
What about it?
V.
I found a living worth working for, but haven't found work worth living for.
|
|
|
|
|
pariisa wrote: Art network with C#
Syntax error: Missing verb or verb misconjugated.
If "art" is used as an ajective and "network" the noun then the question or sentence is missing a verb.
If "Art" is used as a proper noun (the diminutive form of "Arthur" and "network" is a misconjugated verb, should be "networks", then this statement is missing context. Who is Arthur, and what does he wish to network with C#?
|
|
|
|
|
PlayByTheRules wrote: Who is Arthur, and what does he wish to network with C#?
He wants to take it out to dinner. A nice meal, with a few glasses of wine. Maybe a gypsy band playing in the backgroung. Then, who knows?
Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.
|
|
|
|
|
PlayByTheRules wrote: If "Art" is used as a proper noun (the diminutive form of "Arthur" and "network" is a misconjugated verb, should be "networks", then this statement is missing context. Who is Arthur, and what does he wish to network with C#?
I believe that network is being used as a verb in the imperative and there should therefore be a comma or exclamation mark
Art! Network with c#.
Russell
|
|
|
|
|
Ooh. I like that one.
Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I'm tying to use code from the MS web site (Implement a DataSet GROUP BY Helper Class ):
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/326145
The code works well with the DataTable sample they show, but when I use a DataTable populated from an Access database, the object comparison does not work. It only works if I convert to string... any idea why?
********************************************************************************
if (!ColumnEqual( LastSourceRow[Field.FieldName, SourceRow[Field.FieldName] ))
{// yada }
private bool ColumnEqual(object a, object b)
{
/*
* Compares two values to see if they are equal. Also compares DBNULL.Value.
*
* Note: If your DataTable contains object fields, you must extend this
* function to handle them in a meaningful way if you intend to group on them.
*/
if ((a is DBNull) && (b is DBNull))
return true; //both are null
if ((a is DBNull) || (b is DBNull))
return false; //only one is null
return (a==b); //value type standard comparison
}
*********************************************************************************
I did this to make it work:
if (!ColumnEqual( LastSourceRow[Field.FieldName].ToString(), SourceRow[Field.FieldName].ToString() ))
{//yada }
private bool ColumnEqual(string a, string b)
{
/*
* Compares two values to see if they are equal. Also compares DBNULL.Value.
*
* Note: If your DataTable contains object fields, you must extend this
* function to handle them in a meaningful way if you intend to group on them.
*/
if ((a == "") && (b == ""))
return true; //both are null
if ((a == "") || (b == ""))
return false; //only one is null
return (a == b); //value type standard comparison
}
thanks,
Ron
-- modified at 3:07 Wednesday 21st March, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
it works here, with datatable and regular cells.
<br />
DataTable dt = new DataTable("temp");<br />
dt.Columns.Add("col1");<br />
dt.Rows.Add("row1");<br />
dt.Rows.Add("row2");<br />
dt.Rows.Add("row3");<br />
<br />
Console.WriteLine(ColumnEqual(dt.Rows[1][0], dt.Rows[1][0]));<br />
Console.Read();
--> This outputs True (can test it in an empty console app).
You should check it with the debugger, using breakpoints, to see what values are actually compared.
Visual Studio can't evaluate this, can you?
public object moo<br />
{<br />
__get { return moo; }<br />
__set { moo = value; }<br />
}
|
|
|
|
|
Hi joo,
I used MessageBox to show me the comparison, row by row, and they do have the same string in the object (object.ToString()).
They don't compair to true if left in the object (This only happends if the DataTable is populated by ADO). If building the DataTable by code (as in your example), this works fine.
Ron
|
|
|
|
|
It still works when I use ADO...
Your problem appears to be very strange.
SqlConnection conn = new SqlConnection("connstring");<br />
SqlDataAdapter da = new SqlDataAdapter("select * from [table]",conn);<br />
DataSet ds = new DataSet();<br />
da.Fill(ds);<br />
dataGridView1.DataSource = ds;<br />
<br />
Console.WriteLine(ds.Tables[0].Rows[1][1] == ds.Tables[0].Rows[1][2]);
Console.WriteLine(ds.Tables[0].Rows[1][1] == ds.Tables[0].Rows[1][1]);
Visual Studio can't evaluate this, can you?
public object moo<br />
{<br />
__get { return moo; }<br />
__set { moo = value; }<br />
}
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, I spent hours trying to figure out why it was not grouping. Finally, I tried changing the object to a string right at the compairison (a.ToString() == b.ToString()) and magically the grouping worked.
Damn, I guess I have to go to work (day job).
Ron
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, it is probably a good solution. But I still think it's strange that it didn't work before, because here in my sandboxapp it does. Weird.
Have fun working 
Visual Studio can't evaluate this, can you?
public object moo<br />
{<br />
__get { return moo; }<br />
__set { moo = value; }<br />
}
|
|
|
|
|
Hi again joon,
I've been playing around with the stock code again...
I've noticed that if you try and Group By the other columns (OrderID",Int32) [I did change a few rows so some are the same value], it will not group. The stock code only seems to group on a string column? Could you check it our with your sandboxapp?
thanks,
Ron
|
|
|
|
|
OK, I see now...
I'm a fairly new programmer (with no formal training), so I'm not familiar with object comparison. The other methods (min, max) use IComparable, but they don't bother using it for the ColumnEqual method.
I've changed:
return (a==b); //value type standard comparison
to:
if (((IComparable)a).CompareTo(b) == 0)
return true;
else
return false;
works great now, on the different data types and my OleDbCommand string results.
Ron
|
|
|
|
|
The comparison is not right. Having an empty string is not the same as having a null string. What you want to do is expand your checks for this:
private bool ColumnEqual(string a, string b)
{
if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(a) && string.IsNullOrEmpty(b))
return true;
if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(a) || string.IsNullOrEmpty(b))
return false;
return (a == b);
}
Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks Pete,
Yes, I was also worried about null strings too, but I did a test to see what output I would get.
When you convert a DBNull.Value to string, the result is String.Empty. I'll use IsNullOrEmpty, just to be safe though.
Ron
if (DBNull.Value.ToString() == null)
{
MessageBox.Show("null");
}
else if (DBNull.Value.ToString() == "")
{
MessageBox.Show("empty string");
}
else
{
MessageBox.Show("not null or empty");
}
|
|
|
|
|
hi..
i'm writing a utility package for my tool..
i want a method to be used globally that can be called with out
object or its class name.. is it possible.
plz help me..
regards,
nas
|
|
|
|
|
Hello,
Have you tried a static method?
All the best,
Martin
|
|
|
|
|
A public static class with public static methods is probably as close as you can get. Then you can just use Class.DoMethod() from anywhere where the class is available (same project or it's in a reference, don't forget using directive)
<br />
namespace Globality<br />
{<br />
public static class GlobalClass<br />
{<br />
public static void MyMethod()<br />
{<br />
}<br />
}<br />
}<br />
and then somewhere else
<br />
using Globality<br />
<br />
GlobalClass.MyMethod();<br />
Visual Studio can't evaluate this, can you?
public object moo<br />
{<br />
__get { return moo; }<br />
__set { moo = value; }<br />
}
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
