|
In my last project I have 17 different dialogs and it runs like charm...
wrote: I exit and again open my code. now VC Can not open my project
I suppose that you could try to delete the NCB file and the other files that are generated automatically when you rebuild all the solution, this could help in some cases...
Hope this helps
|
|
|
|
|
Hi all.
I am making one win32 application in VC++.NET. I want to use GDI+ Bitmap class in that, but it gives me lots of errors. I have included “gdiplus.h” file and import “gdiplus.lib” in the project. I don’t know what is wrong with it. Can I know what I need to do to use GDI+ Bitmap class?
Thanks in advance,
Priyank
|
|
|
|
|
CBitmap Class is MFC Library,do you want to open bmp files?
|
|
|
|
|
priyank_ldce wrote: but it gives me lots of errors
Such as?
You may be right
I may be crazy
-- Billy Joel --
Within you lies the power for good, use it!!!
|
|
|
|
|
Errors when compiling? Linking? At runtime?
"Great job, team. Head back to base for debriefing and cocktails."
(Spottswoode "Team America")
|
|
|
|
|
Hi
How to convert DRM protected audio files to unprotected audio files.DRM files are purchased from iTunes(from Apple website) and i have to convert those files into unprotected audio files and those files should be in MPEG or AVI or WMV format.
Bala
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
why you convert audio-files into video-files?
why not into mp3?
But before you start to realise this project you need to know that it's not legal
to unprotect a DRM-Media...
So, if a user helps you in this case, the entire forum steps into a "crime"
Sorry to say it to you ![Rose | [Rose]](https://codeproject.global.ssl.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/rose.gif)
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
Not like that, convert Audio file to Audio files and Video file to video file.
It is not a crime,There is already a software called Tunebite where it converts DRM protected audio/video files to unprotected audio/video files.In this website www.tunebite.com they have given that it is not a crime.
Bala
|
|
|
|
|
The only way to do this without braking the DRM is to burn an audio CD with the tracks and re-import them.
after that, if you want to convert them to mpeg or avi ( for whatever reason ) you can you Windows Movie Maker to export to some video format.
|
|
|
|
|
surely you can't just burn an audio compatible CD with your iTunes purchases and then just use that to rip to mp3, because that would be comical.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the info. I guess the downgraded quality is their way of discouraging that as a wholesale way to crack purchased content redistribution, though what the final bitrate/quality is like I don't know. Could you even tell on a personal MP3 player sat on a train? I doubt it.
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah... Just like being able to use a black marker or some scotch tape to defeat the copy protection on a CD would be ridiculous, right? 
http://www.informationweek.com/story/showArticle.jhtml;articleID=174400748[^] 
Peace!
-=- James Please rate this message - let me know if I helped or not!<HR>If you think it costs a lot to do it right, just wait until you find out how much it costs to do it wrong!
Avoid driving a vehicle taller than you and remember that Professional Driver on Closed Course does not mean your Dumb Ass on a Public Road!
See DeleteFXPFiles
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
if we not break DRM then those files will not play in our ordinary pc and players.
My requirement is to convert audio/video files which are brought from iTunes and convert them to to MPEG or AVI or WMV format. In iTunes the files will be DRM protected, so i need to unprotect the files to play in ordinary players.
Thanks for quick response.
Bala
|
|
|
|
|
you cannot legally break the DRM.
The work-around I gave you is the only way to legally do it, if it's done for a personal usage.
|
|
|
|
|
Be aware that doing that is illegal in the US thanks to the DMCA.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi everybody!
Is there any methods to compare system times similar to CompareFileTime for that of Files?
for eg:
if The time is 12 PM
Then,is there any method to compare 12PM>time1
and 12PM
|
|
|
|
|
Use COleDateTime or CTime class.
|
|
|
|
|
Depends on the object used to represent times. If using FILETIME use the function you mention above. If using time_t, you can just use greater-than and less-than.
Peace!
-=- James Please rate this message - let me know if I helped or not!<HR>If you think it costs a lot to do it right, just wait until you find out how much it costs to do it wrong!
Avoid driving a vehicle taller than you and remember that Professional Driver on Closed Course does not mean your Dumb Ass on a Public Road!
See DeleteFXPFiles
|
|
|
|
|
Is reading/writing a 32-bit integer on Win32 guaranteed to be atomic ? I could not find that information anywhere.
wbr Brainley
|
|
|
|
|
|
No. See here[^] for information on how to do it safely. If your programming x86 machine code you could also look up the lock prefix[^].
Steve
|
|
|
|
|
I'm writing a procedure where two values, wich always make up a pair, can be changed from one thread, but read from many. I only want to make shure that a read-operation always returns a valid pair (writing is actually limited by a CRITICAL_SECTION). So i use a checksum. The thread reads the variables and then checks the sum against a checksum. If one of the values got changed somewhere in between, the checksum will not match and it will try again. This works, since simple read/write operations on 32-bit Integers are atomic on 32-bit systems. I chose this way because it is much faster that using a lock mechanism, since write operation happen a lot less often (> factor 20) than write-operations.
|
|
|
|
|
How can it get changed if only one thread ever changes it? How can you be sure it doesn't get
changed while computing the checksum? Is a critical section really that slow?
"Great job, team. Head back to base for debriefing and cocktails."
(Spottswoode "Team America")
|
|
|
|
|
Here a scenarion. Thread A reads, Thread B writes, the pair consists of V1 and V2 of type int.
A reads V1
B writes V1
B writes V2
A reads V2
So now A has a pair that does not belong together. Now consider this :
A reads V1
B writes Checksum V1+V2
B writes V1
B writes V2
A reads V2
A checks the Sum -> does not match, so A tries the read again.
There are a lot more cases, but they all work out.
Using a CRITICAL_SECTION or any other kind of synchronization would mean traps into the OS and context-switches on the wait-operations. In cases where such an optimistic approach is possible, that means the probability of an error, and thus a second or even third read is very low, the performance is higher this way.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
