|
I agree that you would probably get better work from a paid editor. That being said it isn't like it woud be hard to setuo a payment system for editors who do the work online. This way if they don't meet the satisfactory output they will not recieve the same pay (depending on the way you set it up).
Al that being said having a few platinum members volunteering when you get a major backlog would definately be of huge benefeit to you guys.
Annd with regards to the peer review, I was thinking of a pre-publishing system where peers (Golds + Platinums to keep standards whilst conserving numbers) can nominate themselves and select the fields of articles they would like to deal with (C++, C, PHP, Assembly, VB etc.) and then when a new poster asks for peer review the article is placed in a special holding cell for the potential peer.
Or you could have a system where articles up for review are listed to the peers and they can select one they are interested in editing. Make sure to limit this to one at a time though, otherwise old kyle may just have some fun with it. The aricles listed would be in the peers chosen field.
Brad
Australian
- Christian Graus on "Best books for VBscript"
A big thick one, so you can whack yourself on the head with it.
|
|
|
|
|
Bradml wrote: when a new poster asks for peer review the article is placed in a special holding cell for the potential peer.
Typically I find that if someone is actually asking for peer review then typically they don't need it. The very act of asking shows they care about it so have already put in sufficient effort for an article to be posted (at least as an unedited). The real value of peer review would be to hold all articles from authors who have not yet posted an article and not allow the article to be read until it's been approved. That would remove the junk articles we get.
The problem there is that there is a very real chance articles could remain in the pool for quite a while before being given the go-ahead which could be very discouraging for authors.
Now if we had a full time editor onboard we could make it there job to review the list remnants every day... 
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
I think this would most benefeit members from a non English speaking country so that they can communicate with the rest of us. As an added bonus all the other others may just find comfort from a peer review system.
Brad
Australian
- Christian Graus on "Best books for VBscript"
A big thick one, so you can whack yourself on the head with it.
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: Now if we had a full time editor onboard we could make it there job to review the list remnants every day...
You know my offer  .
Brad
Australian
- Christian Graus on "Best books for VBscript"
A big thick one, so you can whack yourself on the head with it.
|
|
|
|
|
Bradml wrote: You know my offer
And I know you stubbornly refuse to come to Toronto 
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: And I know you stubbornly refuse to come to Toronto
Tell you what, I'll send you a cutout of myself that you can stick in front of a desk and yell at whenever something needs doing.
Brad
Australian
- Christian Graus on "Best books for VBscript"
A big thick one, so you can whack yourself on the head with it.
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: If you pay someone then you can be guaranteed of having them work.
That's what I thought too. However, as Brad said, I'm sure most people will have at least a Paypal account. Paying editors by the piece (or by word count) would give them an incentive to do more than a couple of weeks' work for you. Enough editors "on call" as it were would help you when things get too much. You could either pay immediately on reception or get the people to invoice you per month (which would further separate the clowns from the serious people, IMO).
As to picking trustworthy people who can do the job properly, I agree with Brad that Code Project membership status would be one way to determine whether someone is generally serious about this site. The writing abilities of article authors can easily be checked, and although forum postings will generally be of a less polished standard, reading a few will tell you whether the person can string two words together properly. Beyond that, of course, a good old resumé will help you find people who have actually done this kind of thing before.
Anyway, I would definitely be up for it! I'm a Gold member, I've written a few well-rated articles, I've done freelance editing before, and I even have a Master's degree in English. What more could you want?
|
|
|
|
|
Emma Burrows wrote: What more could you want?
Someone in Toronto
I'm working to get a couple more contract editors onboard just to help get the load off me but we are working as hard as we can to have someone in the office who will be part of the team, who can discuss taxonomy, trends, what we can do to help authors and who will be dedicated full time to the task of editing.
Part timers will help get us through but we need to have someone full time, on staff. It just makes everything about 100x easier.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: Someone in Toronto
Damn. I knew you'd mention that. 
Still, if you are looking for a contract editor - or indeed for volunteers paid in kudos - I can probably make myself useful. And in the meantime, I'll work on upping my "Contributor" status to "Writer". Gives me a purpose in life...
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Brad,
Bradml wrote: How about you set up a peer system where authors who do not speak fluent English
I think this is a very good idea. In the past, I volunteered on another site (which appeared to have much less resources than Code Project). Nothing ever materialized.
Jeff
|
|
|
|
|
I know this topic has come up before, but the problem is still there. There is an ever growing of number of users now using the ascii " " as a display name. I origionaly thought it was just the one user, but I have seen several fix their errors, and still users remain without a name.
|
|
|
|
|
Why no create a white list instead of a black one?
Brad
Australian
- Christian Graus on "Best books for VBscript"
A big thick one, so you can whack yourself on the head with it.
|
|
|
|
|
This has been fixed.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Hi All,
I'm trying to email a Contributor, but I can't seem to locate the email link on http://www.codeproject.com/script/profile/...[^].
Any ideas where this can be found? (I understand it only works if the email has been verified).
Jeff
|
|
|
|
|
The only way I know of is to goto a member's forum post and click "Email". Other than that, I don't know of any other way of contacting a member directly.
Maybe CP can put a "Contact" link in each profile.
Trinity: Neo... nobody has ever done this before.
Neo: That's why it's going to work.
|
|
|
|
|
Locate any one message posted by the author and use the 'Email Author' link in that message.
|
|
|
|
|
Jeffrey Walton wrote: Any ideas where this can be found?
Was disabled for contributors see post ->Re: Link to email article authors directly[^]
Chris Maunder wrote:
Our members were getting hassled, spammed, threatended - you name it. We pulled the "Email Author" link to stop this.
I'd love to help, but unfortunatley I have prior commitments monitoring the length of my grass. :Andrew Bleakley:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jeffrey Walton wrote: How about CAPTCHA with an Opt-Out choice?
Well that would eliminate one of the three reasons Chris gave. The other two are probably more important though. The suggested way to contact an author is through the message board in the appropriate article/
Chris Maunder wrote:
Our members were getting hassled, spammed, threatended - you name it. We pulled the "Email Author" link to stop this.
I'd love to help, but unfortunatley I have prior commitments monitoring the length of my grass. :Andrew Bleakley:
|
|
|
|
|
I wish article rating would identify the user that gave a vote. It's never pleasant to take a 1, and articles are taking time to write and are there to help those who need them. If you give a 1 or a 2, please explain why, or you just do it for fun? In this case i would suggest you to abstain.
Criticism should be constructive otherwise it hurts!
|
|
|
|
|
|
i've also observed that some not very well intentionned people were scanning all new articles, and without reading them entirely, were attributing the lowest possible grade. I noticed it because i had 2 articles in the new/update section, and they received a 1 in not 5 minutes.
I hope webmasters of this site have this in mind. We should be able to comunicate with those attributing a rank without posting comments. Maybe the lowest grade is justified for my articles, but i don't know why, even though i think those who are doing this are just willing to do harm...
|
|
|
|
|
Now here is a crazy idea... maybe they weren't great articles....
Brad
Australian
- Christian Graus on "Best books for VBscript"
A big thick one, so you can whack yourself on the head with it.
|
|
|
|
|
Well maybe not, but i will never know why right? These article are about what i do, not for a living, but as a hobby, and it hurts to hear someone saying: "what you do sucks!", without even identify himself or explaining why.
I do not believe that my article suck, nor I believe they should deserve 5, there are obviously people that spend more time than I trying to achieve perfection. What i believe is that some guys around just do it on purpose and they should be watch and banned...
People should have the responsibility over their opinion. I could also sweep all articles and attribute a grade 1 to everybody! Some people think this is funny, i don't.
|
|
|
|
|
David Domingues wrote: I wish article rating would identify the user that gave a vote. It's never pleasant to take a 1, and articles are taking time to write and are there to help those who need them. If you give a 1 or a 2, please explain why, or you just do it for fun? In this case i would suggest you to abstain.
Criticism should be constructive otherwise it hurts!
I've been frequenting these forums for about a year now and can say, without doubt, that the voting system (1) is dominated by a small number of nasty malcontents, and (2) does not reflect the views of the CodeProject community at large. Note, for example, that your articles have been viewed thousands of times, but the total vote count at the time of this writing is only ten. Clearly, the bulk of the community is not participating in the voting process. Most of the alleged 3.7 million "members" here are interested primarily in getting prompt answers to technical questions and really don't contribute in any meaningful way.
But regarding constructive criticism: I attempted to scan one of your articles (the latest one) and found it difficult to do so because of errors in your English grammar. I think a lot of people here scan articles - they read them quickly to get the gist of them. Unfortunately for you, improper and unfamiliar English forms are simply hard to scan; one finds himself re-reading too many sentences. Your article, I thought, was good; but I had to work too hard to discover that.
This, of course, is a difficult problem to fix, since English is not (I presume) your native tongue. If you can't get a native English speaker to proofread and edit your articles for you, I would suggest keeping them as short as possible. This will give you practice in being succinct (good in any language) and will give the reader less to re-read where the form is unconventional. As we often say in our house, "A small success is more impressive than a big failure."
Now let's see what kind of (and how many) votes this messages gets!
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
