|
wrote: I have a static library and an include file that contains export statements for the library. I thought about using dumpbin to get the symbols out of the library, but there are a lot of symbols and I'm not sure what out of the symbols I'm suppose to pull for a .def file.
you only need the names (and declarations) of the functions and variables you're going to actually use.... right ?
|
|
|
|
|
Correct. The static library is already in use and could be used as is in Visual Studio 6.0. However, with changes made in Visual Studio 2003 and above to remove the _io routines, I can no longer link the static libary directly into VS2005. To solve this I assume that I can create a wrapper DLL/import lib on top of the static lib using Visual Studio 6.0, but I'm not sure I understand what I need to do to accomplish this. I only wish to expose the functions that I use. There are about 40 of them.
Mike
|
|
|
|
|
here's how i usually do it:
first, create a "DLL that exports some symbols" project in VC6.
for each function you want to export from the DLL, write a function that goes like this:
Whatever_API_return_Type MyDLLFunction1(params)
{
return MyLibFunction1(params);
}
Whatever_API return_Type MyDLLFunction2(params)
{
return MyLibFunction2(params);
}
etc.
then write headers for those functions:
_Whatever_API return_Type MyDLLFunction1(params);
_Whatever_API return_Type MyDLLFunction2(params);
...
_Whatever_API return_Type MyDLLFunction40(params);
build the DLL, being sure to set the proper #define flag to turn on function exporting (see the main header file for your DLL project).
then replace all your MyLibFunction* calls with the corresponding MyDLLFunction* call. link to the DLL's static lib, and that's that...
|
|
|
|
|
I was trying to avoid this, because I wanted to preserve the function names. However, this seems like a reasonable workflow, I will just cross my fingers that these functions are not used all over the place. Thanks for your help.
Mike
|
|
|
|
|
Hi
I know that there are some products that convert DLL to lib, but in your case I think you rigth with your idea.
The steps could be the following:
1. Build a new dll project in vs2005.
2. In your stdafx.cpp add #pragma comment(lib,"mylib.lib")
3. Include your .lib header file in the project.
4. Declare the new functions, maybe with new names.
I expect this steps help you
Regards
David Leyva
|
|
|
|
|
Hi friends .
How possible deleting some char from middle of a very large file ?
thanks a'lot .
|
|
|
|
|
Copy the bytes from the file, up to the byte in question, into a temporary file. Then copy the remainder of the file into the temporary file. Close both files. Delete the original file. Rename the temporary file. Make sense?
"Approved Workmen Are Not Ashamed" - 2 Timothy 2:15
"Judge not by the eye but by the heart." - Native American Proverb
|
|
|
|
|
DavidCrow wrote: Copy the bytes from the file, up to the byte in question, into a temporary file. Then copy the remainder of the file into the temporary file. Close both files. Delete the original file. Rename the temporary file. Make sense?
Yes, it's even safer than an 'in place' solution. 
(BTW, I'm not 'A_Fa')
|
|
|
|
|
hi friends
Can i can Windiws Handle(HWND) from ProcessID ?
thanks in Advance
|
|
|
|
|
I don't know a direct way.
As workaround, you may enumerate windows and call GetWindowThreadProcessId in your callback.
hope that helps
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
|
|
|
|
|
A process can have many windows. Can you be more specific?
Steve
|
|
|
|
|
yes , i can give specifi ProcessId
|
|
|
|
|
I don't think you understood me properly. A process ID represents a process. A process can have many windows, and generally does. Which of the process’s many windows are you after?
Steve
|
|
|
|
|
I'm looking for a wrapper class that can do minimize to tray and add the small minus minimize button on the top left corner of an application.
I’ve seen code for adding logic to minimize to tray, but I haven’t found any code that can add the small minimize button. For anyone familiar with Kazaa Lite, the minimize button I’m looking for is the one seen on the right upper corner of Kazaa Lite. I’ve seen it on a few other applications, but I don’t remember their names.
Does anyone have any good links for this?
Top ten member of C++ Expert Exchange.
http://www.experts-exchange.com/Cplusplus
|
|
|
|
|
|
Could some one give me idea how can i do that.
buffer[0]= 0xed
buffer[1]=0xb3
int16_t base= 12 bit(having value 3ed)+ lowest 4 bits are zero
Thanks-
|
|
|
|
|
base = ((0xb3 << 8) | 0xed) & 0x0fff;
"Approved Workmen Are Not Ashamed" - 2 Timothy 2:15
"Judge not by the eye but by the heart." - Native American Proverb
|
|
|
|
|
thanks man it works  could u plz tell me one more thing that if I have
(ABC... are bits)
uint8_t n8bit = ABCD EFGH
now I want to change this byte as like
// 0 zero
uint8_t n3bit= 0000 0FGH ???
thanks again..
-- modified at 9:56 Tuesday 9th January, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
Your question is a bit unclear (e.g., bits vs. bytes). I think what you want is:
n3bit = n8bit & 0x00000fff;
"Approved Workmen Are Not Ashamed" - 2 Timothy 2:15
"Judge not by the eye but by the heart." - Native American Proverb
|
|
|
|
|
n3bit &= 0x07;
7 is the added value for the lowest 3 bits.
Here, Hex an Dec makes no difference, but I have given the hex value fore clarity.
"We trained hard, but it seemed that every time we were beginning to form up into teams we would be reorganised. I was to learn later in life that we tend to meet any new situation by reorganising: and a wonderful method it can be for creating the illusion of progress, while producing confusion, inefficiency and demoralisation."
-- Caius Petronius, Roman Consul, 66 A.D.
|
|
|
|
|
DavidCrow wrote: base = ((0xb3 << 8) | 0xed) & 0x0fff;
Isn't
(0xb3 << 12) | (0xed << 4)
is it?
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm not sure what you're asking, if anything, but that produces 0xb3ed0. If that's what the OP is after, great.
"Approved Workmen Are Not Ashamed" - 2 Timothy 2:15
"Judge not by the eye but by the heart." - Native American Proverb
|
|
|
|
|
DavidCrow wrote: I'm not sure what you're asking, if anything, but that produces 0xb3ed0
yes, but it gives 0x3ed0 when assigned to a 16 bit number. My doubt was about the lowest four bits, 'cause, IMHO 0x0FFF erases the highest ones. Anyway the guy was happy with your answer...
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
|
|
|
|
|
CPallini wrote: Anyway the guy was happy with your answer...
Which was confusing as I did not answer his question exactly, and why I entertained the notion that he was confusing bits and bytes.
"Approved Workmen Are Not Ashamed" - 2 Timothy 2:15
"Judge not by the eye but by the heart." - Native American Proverb
|
|
|
|
|
ikbahrian wrote: int16_t base= 12 bit lowest 4 bits are zero
base &= 0x0FFF;
I did not test it, but what I know of bit operators it should work...
"We trained hard, but it seemed that every time we were beginning to form up into teams we would be reorganised. I was to learn later in life that we tend to meet any new situation by reorganising: and a wonderful method it can be for creating the illusion of progress, while producing confusion, inefficiency and demoralisation."
-- Caius Petronius, Roman Consul, 66 A.D.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
