|
I've already got a multiselection CListCtrl in my application. How can I set the selection through code (example: multiselect rows 1,2 and 5)?
[VISUAL STUDIO 6.0] [MFC] [WIN98/2]
 Bluute tette!
|
|
|
|
|
TRy CListCtrl::SetItemState, with
SetItemState(nMyIndex, LVIS_SELECTED | LVIS_FOCUSED , LVIS_SELECTED | LVIS_FOCUSED);
with nMyIndex = 1, 2 and 5
|
|
|
|
|
It works invisible, but it works 
If the list looses it's focus, the selection is not shown on screen (but they remain selected though). How can I set the selection visible even when the focus is transfered to another control?
[VISUAL STUDIO 6.0] [MFC] [WIN98/2]
Bluute tette!
|
|
|
|
|
oeps ... 
Show Selection Always!!! It's as easy.
[VISUAL STUDIO 6.0] [MFC] [WIN98/2]
Bluute tette!
|
|
|
|
|
Yep, or programmatically with
myListCtrl.ModifyStyle(0, LVS_SHOWSELALWAYS)
HTH,
K.
|
|
|
|
|
Damn that's right ! I was wondering where it was... Just in the Styles property sheet of my control .
However I wonder how I can simply change the color to blue as if the list control still had the focus. Actually it greys the background.
Earth > Europe > France > Lyon
|
|
|
|
|
Is there any simple and clean way to add icons to a window on the fly? It seems like you have to create them and hide them is this true?
Thanks for all the help past and future.
|
|
|
|
|
Not quite sure i understand the question, but:
If you want to set the icon for a window, use SetIcon() (MFC) or WM_SETICON.
If you want to create an icon, use CreateIcon() or CreateIconIndirect().
--------
This is what we've waited for
This is it boys, this is War! --Shog9 --
|
|
|
|
|
Hi There,
Can anyone explainme why this piece of code doesn´t work?
I'm running VC 6.0 / W2K.
#include <string>
#include <iostream>
#include <vector>
#include <algorithm>
using std::string;
using std::cout;
using std::vector;
using std::ostream;
using std::endl;
class Dog {
string nm;
public:
Dog ( void ) : nm("NO NAME") {}
Dog(const string& name) : nm(name) {
cout << "Creating Dog: " << *this << endl;
}
// Synthesized copy-constructor & operator=
// are correct.
// Create a Dog from a Dog pointer:
Dog(const Dog* dp, const string& msg)
: nm(dp->nm + msg) {
cout << "Copied dog " << *this << " from "
<< *dp << endl;
}
~Dog() {
cout << "Deleting Dog: " << *this << endl;
}
void rename(const string& newName) {
nm = newName;
cout << "Dog renamed to: " << *this << endl;
}
friend ostream&
operator<<(ostream& os, const Dog& d) {
return os << "[" << d.nm << "]";
}
};
class DogHouse {
Dog* p; //Dog array
string houseName;
public:
DogHouse (Dog * lpDog, const size_t size) : p(new Dog[size]) {
memcpy(p, lpDog, size);
}
DogHouse(Dog* dog, const string& house)
: p(dog), houseName(house) {}
DogHouse(const DogHouse& dh)
: p(new Dog(dh.p, " copy-constructed")),
houseName(dh.houseName
+ " copy-constructed") {}
DogHouse& operator=(const DogHouse& dh) {
// Check for self-assignment:
if(&dh != this) {
p = new Dog(dh.p, " assigned");
houseName = dh.houseName + " assigned";
}
return *this;
}
void renameHouse(const string& newName) {
houseName = newName;
}
Dog* getDog() const { return p; }
~DogHouse() { delete p; }
friend ostream&
operator<<(ostream& os, const DogHouse& dh) {
return os << "[" << dh.houseName
<< "] contains " << *dh.p;
}
};
int main() {
Dog arrDog[2][10] = {
{ Dog("01"),Dog("02"),Dog("03"),Dog("04"),Dog("05") },
{ Dog("11"),Dog("12"),Dog("13"),Dog("14"),Dog("15") }
};
vector <DogHouse> HouseContainer;
/*HouseContainer.push_back(DogHouse(new Dog(arrDog[0]," From static array"), "Static array"));*/
HouseContainer.push_back(DogHouse(arrDog[0], sizeof(Dog)));
/*HouseContainer.push_back(DogHouse(new Dog("Kido"), "KidoHouse"));*/
std::copy(HouseContainer.begin(),
HouseContainer.end(),
std::ostream_iterator<DogHouse>(cout,"\n"));
return 1;
} ///
Assert Memory error raised when trying to do bookeeping.
I guess the problem is how static array of 'Dogs' is copied (using memcpy) to the new object 'DogHouse'.
Can anyone tell me how can I make this idea work without changing the interface, I mean I would like to keep using Dog pointer to store the array of Dog instead of a vector or other containers.
Thanks in advanced.
Carlos.
|
|
|
|
|
Can you please repost the code enabling the option "Display this message as-is (no HTML)", so that brackets appear correctly?
Joaquín M López Muñoz
Telefónica, Investigación y Desarrollo
|
|
|
|
|
Even that your code made no sense as-is (due to lack of formatting and HTML "stealing" your "<" and ">" chars), the error is most definitely in your use of memcpy.
If you want to copy objects, copy objects. As a rule-of-thumb (and unless you're prepared to not being able to maintain the code yourself a short while from now), never ever memcpy a non-POD type.
Replace your DogHouse constructor (the one taking a Dog* and a size_t) with a version that really does the copy, like:
std::copy(lpDog, lpDog + size, p);
and you should at least be closer to a solution. Though, since you are already copying Dog's around here, I see no reason to not use the standard vector.
|
|
|
|
|
Never copy objects of complexed types (user defined type, ie. class, union, OOP struct, ... ) using memcpy.
Especially :
1) that contains new / delete operations for its member data.
2) a inherited one (it is derived from some kind of base class.
Please read Stanley Lippman's "Inside C++ Object Model".
Maxwell Chen
Lets make bugs better!
|
|
|
|
|
Hi There,
Thanks for the replies.
First of all, apologizes for the previous chunck of code, it was all messed up and did not make much of sense.
The reason because a wanted to keep using 'pointers' instead of a 'vector container' was because of the initialization array.
[code]
arrDog [2][5] = {
{ Dog("00"), Dog("01"), Dog("02"), Dog("03"), Dog("04"), }
{ Dog("10"), Dog("11"), Dog("12"), Dog("13"), Dog("14") }
{......}
}
[/code]
In this case initialization array is very small and could easily be changed using vector declaration.
[code]
vector <Dog> arrDog[2];
arrDog[0].push_back(Dog("00"));
arrDog[0].push_back(Dog("01"));
etc...
[/code]
Any way to avoid this anoying declaration?
In my real case, arrDog is about [100][100] and the class used isn´t as simple as Dog.
That is the only reason, just avoid rewriting all the stuff again.
I know this is a *very* poor reason, please don´t flame at me
Althought I will use vectors I have found that using std::copy instead of memcpy things seems to work a bit better.
Does anybody know the gory details of std::copy?
Does std::copy calls copy-constructors members?
Using memcpy instead of std::copy I get rubish when printing stuff saved in vectors but I don´t get memory error, any reason?
[code]
#include <string>
#include <iostream>
#include <vector>
#include <algorithm>
using std::string;
using std::cout;
using std::vector;
using std::ostream;
using std::endl;
class Dog {
string nm;
public:
Dog ( void ) : nm("NO NAME") {}
Dog(const string& name) : nm(name) {
cout << "Creating Dog: " << *this << endl;
}
Dog(const Dog& d) : nm("copy " + d.nm) {
cout << "Copy-constructed Dog " << nm << endl;
}
~Dog() {
cout << "Deleting Dog: " << *this << endl;
}
friend ostream&
operator<<(ostream& os, const Dog& d) {
return os << "[" << d.nm << "]";
}
};
class DogHouse {
Dog * m_p; //Dog Array
int m_n; //Number of dogs
string m_houseName;
public:
DogHouse (const Dog * p, const int n , const string& hn)
: m_p(new Dog[n * sizeof(Dog)]) ,m_n (n), m_houseName(hn) {
std::copy(p, p + n, m_p);
//memcpy(m_p, p , n * sizeof(Dog)); Uncomment this
}
DogHouse(const DogHouse& dh)
: m_p(new Dog[dh.m_n * sizeof(Dog)]), m_n(dh.m_n),
m_houseName(dh.m_houseName + " copy-constructed") {
std::copy(dh.m_p,dh.m_p+dh.m_n,m_p);
//memcpy(m_p, dh.m_p, dh.m_n * sizeof(Dog)); Uncomment this
}
~DogHouse() { delete [] m_p; }
friend ostream&
operator<<(ostream& os, const DogHouse& dh) {
os << "[" << dh.m_houseName << "] contains " << endl;
std::copy(dh.m_p,dh.m_p + dh.m_n,
std::ostream_iterator<Dog>(os,"\n"));
return os;
}
};
int main() {
Dog arrDog[4][5] = {
{ Dog("01"),Dog("02"),Dog("03"),Dog("04"),Dog("05") },
{ Dog("11"),Dog("12"),Dog("13"),Dog("14"),Dog("15") },
{ Dog("21"),Dog("22"),Dog("23"),Dog("24"),Dog("25") },
{ Dog("31"),Dog("32"),Dog("33"),Dog("34"),Dog("35") }
};
vector <DogHouse> HouseContainer;
HouseContainer.push_back(DogHouse(arrDog[0], 5 ," Dog Row 0 "));
HouseContainer.push_back(DogHouse(arrDog[1], 5 ," Dog Row 1 "));
HouseContainer.push_back(DogHouse(arrDog[3], 5 ," Dog Row 3 "));
std::copy(HouseContainer.begin(),
HouseContainer.end(),
std::ostream_iterator<DogHouse>(cout,"\n"));
return 1;
}
[/code]
Regards
Carlos.
|
|
|
|
|
Your choice for the global array is perfectly valid since it's a compile-time static set, no need to use a vector here.
However, I think you'd be better off to make the Dog array m_p inside doghouse a standard container. It would make your code easier to maintain, it would take care of all resource management, and (unless you really wanted to) it would allow you to use the compiler generated versions of copy-contructor, assignment operator and destructor.
Does anybody know the gory details of std::copy?
Yes, and so do you if you look it up in the documentation or even the header files. It's defined by including <algorithm>. If you're using the Dinkum library it's acually defined in <xutility>, though you are only to get to its definition using <algorithm>. It's basically a copy loop.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I am looking to code a method to record audio in a suitable compressed format comaparable to radio quality, with the minimum amount of fuss.
Can someone point me in the right direction? Which libraries and codecs etc.
Thanks,
Richard
|
|
|
|
|
MPEG 1.0 Layer III is the most suitable codec for audio, good quality, small filesize.
|
|
|
|
|
I have an application where i need to store a string for each item in a listview control and later retrieve it and use it again. What would be the best soulution for that? Btw, i wan't the value to be hidden, in other words it can only be accesses inside the program.
Thankyou!
|
|
|
|
|
here's one way: use the Item Data tag on each list item to store an index into an array of strings.
here's another: use the Item Data tag on each list item to store unique ID and use that ID as a key into a std::map of strings.
here's another: use the item data tag on each list item to store a pointer to its string
the last way is probably the easiest, since you don't have to worry about keeping the index order correct (as in the first way) and you don't have to hassle with STL maps (like the second).
-c
ABSURDITY:
A statement or belief manifestly inconsistent with one's own opinion.
|
|
|
|
|
Thankyou. Actually i need to store many items in the listview, maby 1000, so what solution do you think would be the best?
|
|
|
|
|
in theory, they will all work equally well. depending on how items are added and removed and managed in your application, one may work better than the other. you'll have to pick the one that fits best with your app.
-c
ABSURDITY:
A statement or belief manifestly inconsistent with one's own opinion.
|
|
|
|
|
that std::map choice, is that something where you can add a string and then retrieve it again using an index number? if so, do you have documentation on it?
Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
yes. a map allows you to create key/value pairs. the key and value can be of any type (int and string, or int and pointer, string and int, etc.)
there are probably a few articles here on std::map. if not, there are samples in MSDN.
-c
ABSURDITY:
A statement or belief manifestly inconsistent with one's own opinion.
|
|
|
|
|
Does anyone know why pressing "ENTER" closes a dialog-based MFC application ? And I removed all controls, if someone thinks of that ...
Even with controls, if I "ENTER" text in a text control closes the application.
|
|
|
|
|
Override OnOK and delete all the code inside it.
|
|
|
|
|
override PreTranslateMessage. add this code:
if ((pMsg->message == WM_KEYDOWN) && (pMsg->wParam == VK_RETURN))
{
return TRUE;
}
-c
ABSURDITY:
A statement or belief manifestly inconsistent with one's own opinion.
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
