|
now it matches 
so finally changes are:
in *.cpp added
void CTestApp::OnMsg(WPARAM wParam, LPARAM lParam)<br />
{<br />
}
and in *.h
LRESULT to void and ON_MESSAGE to ON_THREAD_MESSAGE
hurahhh...
|
|
|
|
|
There is a good article here at CP covering messages. Message Management
By Joseph M. Newcomer. [^] Definaltly worth a read.
I'd love to help, but unfortunatley I have prior commitments monitoring the length of my grass. :Andrew Bleakley:
|
|
|
|
|
I am trying to get the CFtpFileFind class to work. If I test against my company's ftp site, I can connect and navigate(via SetCurrentDirectoy) to the desired directory, but my call to FindFile(NULL) times out, always. Just to see what files were on there, I connected with an ftp client, and it worked fine. There is only a few files on there( < 10 ) so it isn't a timeout due to too many files.
If I change it to connect to the microsoft ftp site(ftp.microsoft.com), I have no problems, FindFile(NULL) succeeds and everything seems to work fine. Is there something that needs to be configured on the ftp server to allow this call to succeed? Any ideas yould be greatly appreciated.
|
|
|
|
|
In my application I need to handle an event on my CListCtrl icon View. Whenever the user clicks the mouse and drags it to select more than one item, the onMouse Move is not called. Really weird actually, but I need an event to handle this movement.
|
|
|
|
|
skullfire wrote: the onMouse Move is not called.
It works on my machine.
led mike
|
|
|
|
|
Are you handling the WM_MOUSEMOVE event in the correct class?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Greetings:
I need to encrypt some data in a file that is quite small, in most cases, less than 300 bytes. I just need something simple: Provide the function with a key and a block of data to encrypt and it returns with the block of data encrypted. A similar function to decrypt is needed, of course.
Can anybody suggest something? I would prefer it be a C++ thing.
Thanks in advance,
Mark
|
|
|
|
|
Jethro63 wrote: Can anybody suggest something?
Have you tried searching CP? Here is but one example.
"Approved Workmen Are Not Ashamed" - 2 Timothy 2:15
"Judge not by the eye but by the heart." - Native American Proverb
|
|
|
|
|
DavidCrow wrote: Have you tried searching CP?
Rhetorical question? 
led mike
|
|
|
|
|
|
You can search Encrypt on www.codeguru.com 
|
|
|
|
|
In VC 6 I am unable to put a breakpoint on some lines of normal looking code like
int n;
n= 0;-->here
iT says the breakpoint is not positioned on a valid line. When I step through after putting the breakpoint on some other line, it skips the lines it didnt think are valid
I rebuilt all, but no help.
thanks,
sb
|
|
|
|
|
Are you in Release config? that's a classic mistake Also, check you don't have a return above these statements in the same scope - the compiler will consider this redundant code.
Hope this helps
|
|
|
|
|
If n is not used anywhere else, it may get removed by the compiler. Yes, even in debug builds, some optimizations still take place(!).
Add code that actually deos something with it (pass it to _itot(...) for example) and see if the breakpoint works then.
The other reason is a mismatch between the code in the IDE and the application being debugged (if you can set breakpoints on blank lines, that is usually why).
Peace!
-=- James
If you think it costs a lot to do it right, just wait until you find out how much it costs to do it wrong!
Avoid driving a vehicle taller than you and remember that Professional Driver on Closed Course does not mean your Dumb Ass on a Public Road!
DeleteFXPFiles & CheckFavorites (Please rate this post!)
|
|
|
|
|
James R. Twine wrote: Add code that actually deos something with it (pass it to _itot(...) for example) and see if the breakpoint works then.
Doesn't assigning it a value constitute "doing something with it?"
"Approved Workmen Are Not Ashamed" - 2 Timothy 2:15
"Judge not by the eye but by the heart." - Native American Proverb
|
|
|
|
|
It should, but I know that I have seen odd things in the debugger with values that are not otherwise used. Basically, if the release compiler would optimize it out, the debug compiler just might, too.
Odd, I know. Welcome to VC++ 6.0!
Peace!
-=- James
If you think it costs a lot to do it right, just wait until you find out how much it costs to do it wrong!
Avoid driving a vehicle taller than you and remember that Professional Driver on Closed Course does not mean your Dumb Ass on a Public Road!
DeleteFXPFiles & CheckFavorites (Please rate this post!)
|
|
|
|
|
I do have code that is actually doing things, and tried the breakpoints there too. That was assignment statement was just a line , one of many . On some lines it works, on others not, its bizarre. Yes, I am in release mode but I have it set up to allow debugging, and its always worked.
thanks for the input,
sb
|
|
|
|
|
I run into this problem all the time. Out of exasperation, I have found the following fail-safe approach:
1. Close the project.
2. Go into the project directory and delete the .NCB and the .ASP files
3. Re-open the project and re-build
Everything should be straightened out now. This may seem like hitting a fly with a sledge hammer but I got so sick of this happening and I found that this just plain works.
Note: I have found that it happens most often after I have used any revision control system (like SourceSafe). If you have inserted key words into the header of your code files (like "$Log:" or "$History:"), it will displace the code downward and desynchronize it with the debugging information. It does not seem to update the timestamps on the source files, however, so the debug information files do not get rebuilt. So you have to force VS to rebuild them by making them disappear...
Cheers,
Mark
|
|
|
|
|
hmmm....deleting the ncb file and rebuilding all didn't do it. What is the aps file you mention? This is a VC 6 project , is there an aps file?
thanks,
sb
I was so sure the ncb file trick was going to work!
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, its VS6.0 I'm talking about and I always find a file with a name the same as my project and an extension "aps". If memory serves, I also delete the "opt" file as well. I have never bothered to take the time to see which of these 3 files is really responsible. It doesn't matter because they are entirely re-buildable and it doesn't take long.
If this doesn't work then you should check your optimization settings as was previously advised by another respondant.
Cheers,
Mark
|
|
|
|
|
One other thing: Make sure you perform a clean re-build after deleting the files, not just a build-any-out-of-date...
Mark 
|
|
|
|
|
ns wrote: What is the aps file you mention?
I think it is an APp Studio file.
ns wrote: ...is there an aps file?
Yes, there very well could be.
"Approved Workmen Are Not Ashamed" - 2 Timothy 2:15
"Judge not by the eye but by the heart." - Native American Proverb
|
|
|
|
|
<br />
#include <stdlib.h><br />
#include <stdarg.h><br />
#include <stdio.h><br />
<br />
int maxof(int, ...) ;<br />
void f(void);<br />
<br />
main(){<br />
f();<br />
exit(EXIT SUCCESS);<br />
}<br />
<br />
int maxof(int n_args, ...){<br />
register int i;<br />
int max, a;<br />
va_list ap;<br />
<br />
va_start(ap, n_args);<br />
max = va_arg(ap, int);<br />
for(i = 2; i <= n_args; i++) {<br />
if((a = va_arg(ap, int)) > max)<br />
max = a;<br />
}<br />
<br />
va_end(ap);<br />
return max;<br />
}<br />
<br />
void f(void) {<br />
int i = 5;<br />
int j[256];<br />
j[42] = 24;<br />
printf("%d\n",maxof(3, i, j[42], 0));
}
~~~@@@###EZRA###@@@~~~
|
|
|
|
|
EzraYap wrote: printf("%d\n",maxof(3, i, j[42], 0));// Anyone can explain this by step-by-step?
The maxof() function is called, and its return value is then sent to printf().
"Approved Workmen Are Not Ashamed" - 2 Timothy 2:15
"Judge not by the eye but by the heart." - Native American Proverb
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
