|
please help i must make setup project for tomorrow...
|
|
|
|
|
Download it form Microsoft[^].
------------------------------
"The Soapbox has been so ..."
|
|
|
|
|
first page that you url give is about visual studio 2005 but bootstrapper is for visual studio 2003...
|
|
|
|
|
Ok, this seems like it should be simple to do but it is giving me a headache.
Lets say a function returns an object but I dont know what the type of the object is, such as:
object SomeFunction ()<br />
{<br />
return object;<br />
}
And I would like to create a new variable based on the type of object returned.
object o = SomeFunction();<br />
System.Type t = o.GetType();<br />
t NewVar = null;
Why cant I use t to declare the type for NewVar? There has to be a simple way to do this.
|
|
|
|
|
Why should it work? t is a variable, no metter if it's a System.Type, it's still a variable...
I can advise you to do something:
1. either you do a case\if statements to get the Type and do by that.
2. OR either you can do an interface (or use one) that all the types you need can implement from it, eg. string\int.... are most likly implementin ICompareable, you can use that.
I have no more ideas for that...
|
|
|
|
|
Ok, yes t is a variable - but it is holding the magic word the program needs to create the new variable.
Is there any way to extract the type from t so the program thinks it is declaring a variable of that type?
|
|
|
|
|
object newObj = o.GetType().GetConstructor(new Type[] { }).Invoke(new object[] { });
That's assuming there's a default public constructor (one that doesn't have any parameters).
|
|
|
|
|
If you want to create a new instance of a particular type, take a look at Activator.CreateInstance. Notice that it will give you an Object or ObjectHandle back, depending on which overload you call. If you are programming to a interface or there is a base class to the type you are creatting at runtime, you can cast the returning object instance to that type (interface or base class), otherwise you will need your function to return type Object.
This changes with generics in .NET 2.0 however, you can declare a generic method similar to what you had define above, though the syntax looks more like this:
public class Builder
{
public static T Create<T>() where T : class
{
T var = Activator.CreateInstance<T>();
return var;
}
}
Then I can just specify the type as such (assuming a Car and Truck class exist somewhere):
Car c = Builder.Create<Car>();
Person p = Builder.Create<Truck>();
|
|
|
|
|
I have a group of icons in an imagelist. When I try...
item.Icon = (Icon) iconList.Images[def.ImageIndexValue];
...I'm told that I cannot convert an image to an icon. Is this even possible? 
|
|
|
|
|
This is a bit awkward but try it anyway:
<br />
Image img = iconList.Images[def.ImageIndexValue];<br />
Bitmap bitmap = new Bitmap(img);<br />
Graphics.FromImage(bitmap).DrawImageUnscaled(img, 0, 0);<br />
item.Icon = Icon.FromHandle(bitmap.GetHicon());<br />
|
|
|
|
|
this also seems to work
System.Drawing.Bitmap bmp = imageList1.Images[0] as Bitmap;
System.Drawing.Icon icon = Icon.FromHandle(bmp.GetHicon());
"What classes are you using ? You shouldn't call stuff if you have no idea what it does"
Christian Graus in the C# forum
led mike
|
|
|
|
|
Only if the images in the image list are bitmaps 
|
|
|
|
|
hmmm... I ran mine off a .ico file that I used the VS2005 Icon editor to create.
"What classes are you using ? You shouldn't call stuff if you have no idea what it does"
Christian Graus in the C# forum
led mike
|
|
|
|
|
Well....after reading this thread of thought, I'm thinking that the image list was the wrong way to go. Think I'll try just putting the icons into the project resource file.
|
|
|
|
|
i am developing a SDI application.
i have to exit application from other class than Foem class.
how can i do it?
i wrote Application.Exit() in that class, but its not working..
can any body help pls
|
|
|
|
|
If you have other threads running, make sure to stop those as well.
|
|
|
|
|
you can try
Me.Close()
friendship.le
|
|
|
|
|
Hi all,
I have created an object, which is quite large, but very simple, to represent a business document. All well and good...
...but what I'm not too sure about is how to make this object aware of databases.
I've read a few beginners guides on accessing Sql Server from C#, but most of these seem to concentrate on using Data Adapters and what not to display records in a datagrid, via a recordset.
So the question is, how would I go about retrieving a collection of myBusinessDocuments from a database, and display those in a DataGrid and enabling updating, deleting, creating, rather than just returning a recordset and displaying that in a datagrid?
Any help, pointers to articles, impatient sighs greatly appreciated 
-- modified at 15:24 Thursday 18th May, 2006
(Oh, if it makes a difference I'm using C# 2.0 and SQLServer 2005)
|
|
|
|
|
I think that's one of the ongoing topics of language research.
You could serialize a class and send it up to the database as a binary, but that's probably not good.
LINQ[^](C# 3.0) is a step in the right direction. You can get the May beta here[^].
Until that's finalized though I think you have to sorta live with SQL queries and ADO.
|
|
|
|
|
Interesting reading there, so I guess the next question is how do folks commonly do this type of task at the moment?
I imagine there's an awful lot of business objects out there in n tier applications, which must need to be persisted to a database at some point. Any idea how they integrate these with ADO.Net (and what would the UML diagram look like)?
Cheers,
Martin.
|
|
|
|
|
To be honest, I'm not too sure.
When it comes to networking and databases I grew up in the Unix environment, and the style there is quite different -- not too much OOP, not too much architectural consideration. Most of the code I saw was just raw SQL queries. Things are really down to earth, not that that's necessarily a good thing.
My experience with ADO.NET hasn't been too good; it's one of the few things that really bothers me about .NET, though that's apparently what LINQ is trying to change. The idea is quite intuitive, but there's a lot of quirks that you have to get around, and you'll be pulling your hair out if you don't plan things carefully.
I'd probably just work with SQL queries encapsulated by business objects that do all the logic and sanity checks. You have to be extra careful especially with security (watch out for SQL source injection[^]), but it's a lot easier to know what's going on.
Here's a pretty good guide on System.Data in case you decide to go that route: http://www.codeproject.com/csharp/practicalguidedatagrids1.asp[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Again, some interesting articles there
I've done some more digging around on this, and it looks as if Data Access Layer is what's called for here... possibly!
Here's what seems to be a good article on the subject: http://msdn.microsoft.com/msdnmag/issues/03/04/DataAccessLayer/
To my mind, and from what I understand of the subject so far, the controls and types povided by MS (DataGrid, DataSet etc. etc.) are simply one type of Data Access Layer, back-ended by ADO.Net - and given the right level of skill, knowledge and know how (not to mention time) it should be possible to work the same kind of magic with your own classes and what not.
I'm sure all the tools are there to enable this, but it does seem to me that it would involve a lot of monkey work, developing frameworks etc - maybe I'm wrong, or maybe this is what LINQ will solve. Further investigation on going
(I also hear that Ray Lohkta's book C# Business Objects covers this subject as well, but I think it's probably beyond my grasp at the moment... I'm just getting to grips with the concept of design patterns)
Cheers,
Martin.
|
|
|
|
|
It's pretty frustrating just dealing with all of these options, none of which seem to be very concise.
Sorta makes sense that database programmers are among the best paid
Here's[^] another article I found, though you might find it's not too informative.
Good luck with your work!
|
|
|
|
|
Hello. I'm having a problem with focus. I'm developing an application with VS 2005 that is like the Outlook mail notification. I have a NotifyIcon and at a time a winform appear. The problem is that when I'm typing for example a word document and the alert appear I lost the focus to the alert and I can't continue typing my document. I call the window with frmForm.Show();
Thanks a lot !!!
|
|
|
|
|
After you show the alert, you must set the focus back to your form.
this.form1.Focus();
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
