|
How many times do I have to tell you this before it sinks in???
I'm on my third try here...
To run the .NET Framework 2.0 on Windows 2000, you MUST MUST MUST MUST MUST upgrade Windows 2000 (any edition) to SP4 or better!!! There are no exceptions to this and no "special" version of .NET 2.0 for other versions of Windows 2000. You either upgrade to SP4 or you don't run the .NET Framework 2.0 on it.
Got it???
If you don't want to upgrade to Service Pack 4, your only option is to use the .NET Framework 1.1 or lower. You'll loose the ability to use any of the features introduced in 2.0, and there are alot of them...
The choice is yours...
RageInTheMachine9532
"...a pungent, ghastly, stinky piece of cheese!" -- The Roaming Gnome
|
|
|
|
|
Dave Kreskowiak wrote: If you don't want to upgrade to Service Pack 4, your only option is to use the .NET Framework 1.1 or lower.
When I bought VS 2003 in 2004 it forced me to apply SP4 then. Though I think MS literature did say that SP2 would have been fine. But MS tend to force you to apply whatever is their current SP as a prerequisite for these things, regardless of whether they're really necessary or not. I suppose it's because of testing and support issues.
Kevin
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, I learned a long time agao that if you have a problem and the system in question doesn't meet the minimum requirements, the first thign they'll tell you to do is update the system to the minimums, then they'll talk to you.
RageInTheMachine9532
"...a pungent, ghastly, stinky piece of cheese!" -- The Roaming Gnome
|
|
|
|
|
i want to know if it is possible to get hardware identification of my machine using .net framework also if itis possible to make .dll file with it and calling with java programm
is there .net frame work version for 2000professinal or xssp1 windows operating systeme
am
|
|
|
|
|
ss2006 wrote: is possible to get hardware identification of my machine using .net framework
Yes. You'll have to use WMI to get any information about the hardware. There is no standard for manufacturers to follow so the information you do get can, and will, be spoty. Serial Numbers are notoriously difficult to get since most manufacturers don't put them in the hardware.
If your trying to use this information as some kind of registration key, then you'll have to get as much information as you can about the hardware installed and combine it somehow to generate some kind of key.
ss2006 wrote: itis possible to make .dll file with it and calling with java programm
You'll be running code in two different runtimes at the same time. Memory requirements will be quite large for something so simple! If your Java library has access to WMI, skip doing this in the .NET Framework and simplify your code, not to mention your supportability, and keep it in the Java environment if that's your primary language for this project.
ss2006 wrote: is there .net frame work version for 2000professinal or xssp1 windows operating systeme
No. There is no seperate .NET Framework for these versions of Windows. Either patch those versions up to the minimum SP version required by the .NET Framework version your're using (A REALLY good idea considering the security fixes that are included!) or you'll be forced to use the .NET Framework 1.1 or lower.
RageInTheMachine9532
"...a pungent, ghastly, stinky piece of cheese!" -- The Roaming Gnome
|
|
|
|
|
i want to get the .net framework 2.0 (redistrubual) for windows 98 ,2000 ,professional ,xp service pack 1
am
-- modified at 14:10 Sunday 26th March, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
If possibl that we can install .net framework 2.0 or later on any windows platform(98, 2000,2000 professionel ,millenuem,xp service pack1,2,)
because i have problem which is:
i hav ea programme which uses .net framework i compile it and i debug the .exe this .exe cant executed on windows xp service pack1 or 2000,because it needs installation of .net framework 2.0.50727or later
am
|
|
|
|
|
You have to have .NET framework 2.0 on the target machine in order to run a .NET 2.0 application.
Captian obvious out
--------------------------------------------------------
Q:What does the derived class in C# tell to it's parent?
A:All your base are belong to us!
|
|
|
|
|
You MUST install the .NET Framework 2.0 on the target machines to get your ap to work on them.
You can find the O/S requirements here[^].
RageInTheMachine9532
"...a pungent, ghastly, stinky piece of cheese!" -- The Roaming Gnome
|
|
|
|
|
Hi there,
Well, I am facing some problems while loading an assembly dynamically from a subdirectory located in ApplicationBase. The code works just fine when this dll is located in the application directory but when I tried to load it from one of the application's subdirectory it is not working even when I tried following options:
First, I created a "test" subdirectory for my test.dll(As far as my understanding of deploying a private assembly goes I believe runtime locates dll in application directory then it looks for a subdirectory having dll's name e.g. temp in this case and finally it goes to GAC.)
Second, I get following error log from fusion
LOG: Private path hint found in configuration file: test.
LOG: Policy not being applied to reference at this time (private, custom, partial, or location-based assembly bind).
where test is the subdirectory I am putting this dll.
I have included <probing privatepath="test"> in app.config but it doesn't seem to work.
Also I have tried to use <qualifyassembly> tags and made this assembly strong named and unfortunately that didn't work either.
Additionally, I have tried both LoadFrom() and Load() methods but no help.
As far as my understanding goes I think I do not need to create a strong named assembly when I am using probing element in config.
Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks in advance.
-Subby
-- modified at 13:55 Sunday 26th March, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I usually use this method
<br />
AppDomain.CurrentDomain.AppendPrivatePath( path )<br />
to add a directory (e.g. for plugins) that the assembly resolver should include in its probing.
Hope this helps,
Tim
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks,
I tried the AppendPrivatePath method and had the similar problem.
I finally figured out the problem. It is little silly but I didn't know that the problem was because of changing method from LoadFrom(which requires complete filename) to Load. In the load method I was giving the complete dll name e.g. test.dll so the runtime was looking for directories
library test.dll.dll
Thanks Anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
df
Thanking You.
Sincerely,
VIRAL PATEL
|
|
|
|
|
Whst's this?
What do u want?
"Aim to go where U have never been B4 and Strive to achieve it"
http://groups.yahoo.com/subscribe/dotnetforfreshers
http://himabinduvejella.blogspot.com
|
|
|
|
|
I wish to convert a 96dpi image to a 300dpi image in .NET...
Here's the code I currently use:
// iMage is the original 96dpi image
int iNht=(iMage.Height*300)/96;
int iNwd=(iMage.Width*300)/96;
Bitmap bMap=new Bitmap(iMage,iNwd,iNht);
bMap.SetResolution(300,300);
iMage=bMap;
The code works fine, but there's one problem - the 300dpi image is of poor quality (appears kinda faded)... Time is of concern, so I'm avoiding needing to write my own resize method... But the poorer quality is also not acceptable!! 
Any ideas??
Thanks!!
|
|
|
|
|
You are not only changing the resolution, you are also resizing it. As you enlarge it to more than three times the original size, of course the image quality will be bad. Even if the image is larger, there still isn't any more detail information than in the original image.
If the image looks faded and not pixly, the resize is most likely using the bicubic method. It's the best you can do with conventional methods.
If you wan't a better resizing method you might look up something called Genuine Fractals.
---
b { font-weight: normal; }
|
|
|
|
|
That was helpful...
Thanks Guffa!
|
|
|
|
|
Any ideas where I could read more about better resizing methods, esp any designed for enlarging images ?
Thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
I have a Solution (Sol_1) in its own directory with a regular project (Proj_1) and a deployment project(Proj_1_Setup). Each of the projects in its own directory and the directory name is the same as the project name.
Then I needed to create a copy of the entire solution, rename the projects and the directories.
I copied the Sol_1 directory to Sol_2. Then I started the VS IDE and used the Solution Explorer to rename the solution (Sol_2) and both projects (Proj_2 and Proj_2_Setup).
That left me with a Sol_2 directory containing a Proj_1 sub-directory which contains a Proj_2 project. I also have a Proj_1_Setup sub-directory which contains a Proj_2_Setup project
How do I safely rename the Proj_1 and Proj_1_Setup sub-directories without fouling up all internal places where the VS IDE keeps track of this stuff?
FWIW, I'm using Visual Studio 2003 and the application uses VB.Net.
Thanks.
--Andy, WV8AA
|
|
|
|
|
Make a backup of it all (for safety) and just rename the folders. When you open the solution VS should complain that it can't find the projects, and give you the option to locate them.
---
b { font-weight: normal; }
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
Can anyone tell me if I can use .Net Framework 2.0 with Visual studio .Net 2002. I have not been able to add references of the system.dll of version 2.05. The message I get is something like not recognized COM or dll.
If can please explain how to use debug using 2.0v with VS .Net 2002.
Thanks
Vijay
Vijay
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot do this. Visual studio is tightly coupled to the framework. VS02 will work with .net1.0 only. Try the free Express versions or sharpdevelop if you don't want to buy VS05.
|
|
|
|
|
Hey Why do u want like that?
It's not poosible
"Aim to go where U have never been B4 and Strive to achieve it"
http://groups.yahoo.com/subscribe/dotnetforfreshers
http://himabinduvejella.blogspot.com
|
|
|
|
|
I am trying to communicate over Rs232 using a basic RS232 class for .NET. I am able to communicate fine for the most part with most devices. However, a few devices don't respond or respond with garbage when I try to receive data from them in my program. If I connect with HyperTerminal and send the same commands, I get a correct response, and if I try to connect with my application after having connected with HyperTerminal, my application talks fine with the devices.
It is almost as though HyperTerminal is doing some additional initialization that a straight serial connection isn't. Is there anything that anyone can think of that I could do to get my application to behave more similarly to the HyperTerminal way other than checking the settings such as baud rate, parity, stop bits and flow control?
I know this is sort of open ended, but there isn't really another way to describe it so far as I can tell.
Thanks for any feedback.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
