|
Giorgi Moniava wrote:
What am i doing wrong???
The memory that the variables in foo() point to goes away when the function exits. An alternative would look like:
TCHAR *foo( void )
{
TCHAR *c = new TCHAR[ARRAY_SIZE];
_tcscpy(c, _T("some text"));
return c;
}And remember to free the memory using delete [].
"One must learn from the bite of the fire to leave it alone." - Native American Proverb
|
|
|
|
|
thanks david for your fast reply 
i was surprised when in my code even after the function foo() ended up in debugger , tmp was still pointing at that text (tmp 0x0012fdd4 "some text") now i understand that it pointed to freed memory.
but as i see only memory block 0x0012fdd4 still existed as the 's' symbol was printed in the output. and next 8 blocks were destroyed . right yes ?
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - W.Churchill
-- modified at 9:24 Wednesday 21st September, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
Giorgi Moniava wrote:
i was surprised when in my code even after the function foo() ended up in debugger , tmp was still pointing at that text (tmp 0x0012fdd4 "some text")
Don't be surprised. Until Windows has a need to put something else at that memory location, it could remain there indefinitely.
Try this. In foo(), make a note of the memory address pointed to by c. Back in main() after foo() returns, make a call to IsBadStringPtr(). It should give you a non-zero return value indicating that you do not have read access to that location.
"One must learn from the bite of the fire to leave it alone." - Native American Proverb
|
|
|
|
|
Not necessarily.
Where malloc and free or new and delete are concerned, only if the underlying memory manager has decomitted and released the virtual memory block. Otherwise, it is still a valid memory block for reading and writing as far as the OS is concerned, but not as far as the underlying memory pool manager is concerned. After it is 'freed' it is probably marked with a header and added to the internal memory manager free list.
IsBadStringPtr will only work if there is no NUL byte encountered before you get to the end of the underlying virtual memory block.
He might have been be able to find out it is not valid my calling something else, except that this particular memory was from the stack, so that makes it even more interesting. It depends upon how much the stakc had actually grown and where a NUL byte might be coincidentally located if the IsBadStringPtr will trigger or not.
|
|
|
|
|
Blake Miller wrote:
IsBadStringPtr will only work if there is no NUL byte encountered before you get to the end of the underlying virtual memory block.
If that was the case, then IsBadReadPtr() should be used instead. Yes?
"One must learn from the bite of the fire to leave it alone." - Native American Proverb
|
|
|
|
|
To test an exact amount of memory, yes, the IsBadReadPtr() should be used. The IsBadStringPtr() will stop at the first NUL it encounteres, therefore not necessarily testing the specified range of memory.
|
|
|
|
|
Blake Miller wrote:
The IsBadStringPtr() will stop at the first NUL it encounteres, therefore not necessarily testing the specified range of memory.
But since Giorgi was dealing with a nul-terminated string in memory, range was not an issue. For ANSI strings, they won't have more than one nul character so IsBadStringPtr() will work. I can't say the same for Unicode strings, however.
"One must learn from the bite of the fire to leave it alone." - Native American Proverb
|
|
|
|
|
What I was reying to imply was the following:
1. He has address of string that was on the STACK of a function which has already returned.
2. If he calls IsBadStringPtr() he will get an answer depending upon if the data happens to hit a NUL byte or not before reaching the end of the stack memory. If he limits the range to the size of the orignal stack variable, it might still return as 'okay', even though we already know technically it is not.
3. The answer should be BAD, but it won't necessarily be bad because that stack memory would probably still be valid AND he might have a NUL byte in there.
So, my final answer is that IsBadStringPtr will let you know if it is truly bad, but it should not ever be used as a test that it is good. In this case it would imply the memory is okay to use, but indeed it is not - you will be overwriting your stack,a nd if you are only reading, you are probably reading code and local variables of another function by now.
|
|
|
|
|
You might find this code snippet I developed interesting:
You can call this to find out if the address is a member of the local stack memory pool or not.
If not, it might be a local function of another thread’s stack, or from the memory allocation pool.
<br />
<br />
BOOL WINAPI IsOnStackOrNot(LPCVOID pObject)<br />
{<br />
BOOL bRetVal = FALSE;<br />
<br />
if( pObject ){<br />
<br />
LPVOID pStack;<br />
MEMORY_BASIC_INFORMATION TheMemoryInfo;<br />
<br />
_asm mov eax, esp;<br />
_asm mov pStack, eax;<br />
<br />
if( sizeof(TheMemoryInfo) <= VirtualQuery(pStack, &TheMemoryInfo, sizeof(TheMemoryInfo)) ){<br />
if( ((DWORD)pObject >= (DWORD)TheMemoryInfo.BaseAddress) &&<br />
((DWORD)pObject <= ((DWORD)TheMemoryInfo.BaseAddress + (DWORD)TheMemoryInfo.RegionSize) ) ){<br />
bRetVal = TRUE;<br />
}<br />
}<br />
}<br />
<br />
return bRetVal; <br />
}<br />
<br />
If you also compared address to CURRENT value of ESP and EBP, you could probably deduce if it is a local variable, a parameter, or something from a PREVIOUS function call's stack.
|
|
|
|
|
In function foo, the pointer you are returning points to a temporary stack string that goes out of scope when the function returns. You need to allocate memory on the heap using new and then return this pointer. Of course, now you'd need the caller to manually delete the string.
|
|
|
|
|
"some text" gets placed on the stack. it will remain there until the next function call. when cout is called, it places the arguements on the stack and will overwrite part of "some text". if you make the array a const or static it will go in the code or data segment (not the stack) and it will remain.
Just livin a dream.. dont wake me!
|
|
|
|
|
I'm writing an app that I want to be able to dynamically move some controls around on my dialog box. I was thinking of simply using ::GetWindowRect() and ::MoveWindow() to do that, but for those functions I need the window handle (HWND). Can the member variable connected to those controls work as the window handle, or houw can this be done?
Danny
|
|
|
|
|
bugDanny wrote:
Can the member variable connected to those controls work as the window handle, or houw can this be done?
Why not just use CWnd::GetWindowRect() and CWnd::MoveWindow()? No handle required.
"One must learn from the bite of the fire to leave it alone." - Native American Proverb
|
|
|
|
|
You can use control variable associated with it.Alternatively ,Use GetDlgItem() for getting control windows and use those.
|
|
|
|
|
Depending on what you want to do, there is also some nice articles on here for dynamically moving all controls when resizing dialogues.
I tend to map controsl to control variables and use their own move methods, eg:
m_btnOK.MoveWindow(...);
Rather than:
pWnd = GetDlgItem(IDOK)
if(pWnd != NULL)
pWnd->MoveWindow(...)
Mapping variables to the controls uses less code and no need to worry about correct id values, null pointers etc.
HTH.
Andrew
|
|
|
|
|
Most controls are directly derived from CWnd, in which case you can use the CWnd member function of ::GetWindowRect() and ::MoveWindow(), meaning :
RECT rect;
m_mycontrol.GetWindowRect(&rect);
If you absolutley want to use the upper scope functions, you can retrieve the HWND using GetSafeHwnd()
HWND hWnd = m_mycontrol.GetSafeHwnd()
BTW, you might want to consider also GetClientRect(), as well as ScreenToClient() and ClientToScreen() to play around moving controls, because I am afraid that the two functions you mentioned will not be sufficient.
Hope this helps,
~RaGE();
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hi All
I am making an application in which I have to insert the values into the tree recursively.
I have been stucked that how should I do this?
I am using CTreeCtrl class of MFC for tree control.
So Please help me ...
Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
Recursion simply means that a function calls itself. What are you populating the tree control with?
"One must learn from the bite of the fire to leave it alone." - Native American Proverb
|
|
|
|
|
Infact I want to insert a node into the tree
- Then all the subnodes of that node will be called recursively and being inserted into the tree.
What I am doing is as follows
<br />
<br />
Now I want to insert all the local folders of Outlook Express into the tree as it looked into the Outlook Express .
But The tree from this code is not resembling to that one.
So please tell how should I modify programm to look like Outlook Express.
From the code it is clear that it enumerates all the folders & subfolders of outlook exress , So I want to display it in the tree form.
Note that
"m_pStoreNamespace is the object of Interface IStoreNameSpace"
Please reply.
|
|
|
|
|
I see you are using code from this article. So what exactly is or is not happening? Does the tree control get populated at all? Are items missing? Is the hierarchy wrong?
"One must learn from the bite of the fire to leave it alone." - Native American Proverb
|
|
|
|
|
Ya I am using sample from the link You have mentioned.
As I told I want to insert the folders & subfolders of the outlook express in the order as it is in outlook express to make user interface better, as in the article values are inserted into listbox.
So please suggest me.
Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
rajeevktripathi wrote:
As I told I want to insert the folders & subfolders of the outlook express in the order as it is in outlook express...
If the items are being inserted correctly but are just in the wrong order, it sounds like you need to add the items to some data structure first, sort them, and then add them to the tree control. If that does not sound right, you'll need to better explain what your program is doing that is not right (that's why I asked those other three questions).
"One must learn from the bite of the fire to leave it alone." - Native American Proverb
|
|
|
|
|
HI!!
for developing a download manager utility... i will have to use reliable udp to ensure that packets are not lost and are deliv'rd in proper order.... how do i implement it?
V.G
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
You cant ensure that messages sent over UDP will arrive in the order they were sent in, however, you can add an int (order) to the message structure indicating the order of the sent message, then you can re-arrange these messages according to that number.
To ensure that all messages arrive, implement a hand shaking mechanism. Something like:
1. Send a Message to the other end.
2. Mark it as "did not reach" i your program.
3. If the message reaches its destination, the destination sends an acknowledgment
4. After a predefined timout, if no acknowledment arrives, resend the message with the same order.
Good luck
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
