|
I would say go write it as a Service. While David suggested to run it as a Scheduled Task it has its disadvantages. Namely what happens if the user that is supposed to run the Scheduled Task is not logged in ? Your scheduled task will not run.
|
|
|
|
|
Scheduled Tasks don't need anyone to be logged on for them to run. The scheduled tasks run under their own session and can be run under any account, especially one specifically created for the purpose. The machine can be sitting at the login screen and the Task will stil run just as if someone was logged in.
RageInTheMachine9532
"...a pungent, ghastly, stinky piece of cheese!" -- The Roaming Gnome
|
|
|
|
|
I do know how to read from a file, but I am not sure how you would go about making all of the correct associations so the data can be entered into the database at the correct location....if that makes sense. For instance, you have a text file with information from many different computers...How would I make sure that data from the text file is entered into the correct column in my DB table?
|
|
|
|
|
Well, you're specifying what data your collecting, the file format your going to use, the database tables, ... Since your specifying the file format, you get to map what columns of the text file get mapped to which columns in the database. For example...
Your collecting the machine name, the O/S version, and how much memory is installed in the machine. The client app would probably write something like this to the text file:
820db904-3dd1-4035-ba68-776debc7b796;AGC2010A;5.1.2600.0;1024
Since your defining the file format, the same data will go into the same columns for each line. When you read the line, you use the .Split() method on the string you read to break the line up into an array of strings. You can now go through that array and map each of those strings to the appropriate columns. It's a one-for-one relationship that doesn't change throughout the entire file.
RageInTheMachine9532
"...a pungent, ghastly, stinky piece of cheese!" -- The Roaming Gnome
|
|
|
|
|
The knowledge is much appreciated. I am 6 months into this, and programming is like a freakin disease. I CAN'T help myself. I think I am going to alter my app to work more like the Frame of yours. I really like the idea of dumping everything into the text file, and I think you have given me enough ideas to start working at it!
I did have another question for you. What is the easiest way to get the GUID of a computer?
Eric
|
|
|
|
|
The computer really doesn't have a GUID. In my method, I checked a file on the hard drive (C:\InvGuid.txt), if it wasn't there, I generated a new GUID and used that as the GUID to ID that machine. The new GUID was written to the file for use the next time the app was run. If the file is there already, read the GUID out of the file. Simple.
How do you generate a GUID?
Guid myGUID = Guid.NewGuid();
RageInTheMachine9532
"...a pungent, ghastly, stinky piece of cheese!" -- The Roaming Gnome
|
|
|
|
|
I have gotten this far...
I can write to a text file, and then use the Split() method like you said to put everything into an array.
What would be the best way for me to add this array of strings to my DB?
|
|
|
|
|
I have gotten this far...
I can write to a text file, and then use the Split() method like you said to put everything into an array.
What would be the best way for me to add this array of strings to my DB?
|
|
|
|
|
How one can declare a variable - pointer to a static function in C#? And how one can initialize such variable? I need to have a pointer to a WindowProc function, and I need to implement the function itself. How can I do that?
C++ libraries at a give-away price on www.neatcpp.com: TWAIN, DirectShow, Interprocess Communications, etc...
|
|
|
|
|
|
A delegate is similar to a function pointer:
delegate void MyDelegateType(int i);
void SomeFunction(int hello);
// Declare a function-pointer
MyDelegateType funcPtr = new MyDelegateType(SomeFunction);
// Call the function
funcPtr(5);
Tech, life, family, faith: Give me a visit.
I'm currently blogging about: The Secular Left, the Religious Right, and Prejudice
Judah Himango
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you, this did the job!
P.S. Munch is cute 
C++ libraries at a give-away price on www.neatcpp.com: TWAIN, DirectShow, Interprocess Communications, etc...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Is it possible to get incomming information from the serial port using the Net Frameworks v1.1 ?
Can anyone help me with this?
Thanx
|
|
|
|
|
This[^] should just about cover it.
RageInTheMachine9532
"...a pungent, ghastly, stinky piece of cheese!" -- The Roaming Gnome
|
|
|
|
|
Hey!
I am using the following code in a event(SerialPort.RecivedData event) that fires whenever data is written to a stream(serialPort)
<br />
if (RUNNING)<br />
{<br />
ThreadPool.QueueUserWorkItem(new WaitCallback(onDataReceived));<br />
currentRunningThreads++;<br />
}<br />
in OnDatareceived the serialPort is used to read the existing data.
Now i need to close this serialPort, but i get errors without any source to show?
I am setting Running to false, but that is not solving it?
How can a see when the ThreadPools threads realy is finish with theres jobb?
Best Regards
Snowjim
|
|
|
|
|
A more Specified error message:
First a MessageBox that says that there is no source code to be displayed.
Then a smaller box appers
Title: ObjectDisposedException was unhandled
safe handler has been closed
I do have try and catch on every method i have but this exception is never runned(if it would i could see where the error is appering in my code)
|
|
|
|
|
One solution would be to create an event CloseSerialPort and call it from the onDataReceived method when it has finished it's job. Then you could put all the code needed to close your serial port in the event handler.
I reject your reality and substitute my own!
- Adam Savage, Mythbuster
-George W Bush
life is like a roll of toilet paper. The closer it gets to the end, the faster it goes.
|
|
|
|
|
How do i know when to call this CloseSerialPort in onDataReceived method?
consider this:
SerialPort.RecievedData event is triggerd
Job is added to the threadpool that points to the onDataReveived method
SerialPort.RecievedData event is triggerds 5 times and diffrent threads are working there way thow onDataReceived that contains a look part.
By this i will not know what thread that is the last one.
I need to close this threads before i can call serialport.close();
|
|
|
|
|
Instead of directly using ThreadPool, you can try wrapping OnDataReceived in a delegate and calling BeginInvoke on the delegate. That'll allow you to pass a callback that'll get called once OnDataReceived completes. Even otherwise, BeginInvoke returns an IAsyncResult that has a bool property IsCompleted that you can query to find out if the method has completed.
Regards
Senthil
_____________________________
My Blog | My Articles | WinMacro
|
|
|
|
|
Hello,
I have a question regarding inserting and repositioning XML nodes... I need to insert a new node and move the existing 'grandchildren' nodes to be under the newly inserted node. Basically, I have an xml doc that looks like this:
<root>
<child1 Id="">
<grandchild1>text1</grandchild1>
<grandchild2>text2</grandchild2>
<grandchild3>text3</grandchild3>
<grandchild4>text4</grandchild4>
<grandchild5>text5</grandchild5>
<grandchild6>text6</grandchild6>
<grandchild7>text7</grandchild7>
</child1>
<child2 Id="1">
<grandchild1>text1</grandchild1>
<grandchild2>text2</grandchild2>
<grandchild3>text3</grandchild3>
<grandchild4>text4</grandchild4>
<grandchild5>text5</grandchild5>
<grandchild6>text6</grandchild6>
<grandchild7>text7</grandchild7>
</child2>
<child3 Id="2">
<grandchild1>text1</grandchild1>
<grandchild2>text2</grandchild2>
<grandchild3>text3</grandchild3>
<grandchild4>text4</grandchild4>
<grandchild5>text5</grandchild5>
<grandchild6>text6</grandchild6>
<grandchild7>text7</grandchild7>
</child3>
</root>
And I would like to load this existing file using C# .NET, then end up with the XML doc to look like this (see below).
<root>
<child1 Id="">
<newnode1>
<grandchild1>text1</grandchild1>
<grandchild2>text2</grandchild2>
<grandchild3>text3</grandchild3>
<grandchild4>text4</grandchild4>
<grandchild5>text5</grandchild5>
<grandchild6>text6</grandchild6>
<grandchild7>text7</grandchild7>
<newnode1>
</child1>
<child2 Id="1">
<newnode2>
<grandchild1>text1</grandchild1>
<grandchild2>text2</grandchild2>
<grandchild3>text3</grandchild3>
<grandchild4>text4</grandchild4>
<grandchild5>text5</grandchild5>
<grandchild6>text6</grandchild6>
<grandchild7>text7</grandchild7>
<newnode2>
</child2>
<child3 Id="2">
<newnode3>
<grandchild1>text1</grandchild1>
<grandchild2>text2</grandchild2>
<grandchild3>text3</grandchild3>
<grandchild4>text4</grandchild4>
<grandchild5>text5</grandchild5>
<grandchild6>text6</grandchild6>
<grandchild7>text7</grandchild7>
<newnode3>
</child3>
</root>
See where the 'newnode' is inserted and the existing 'grandchild' nodes are now located under the 'newnode'. Would a for loop be the most efficient here... where I can set it up to look for all the 'child' nodes and loop through to insert the 'newnode' and reposition it's 'grandchild' nodes? I'm trying to keep my code very simple here without trying to add in any extra namespaces or classes.
Any advise would be most appreciated! Thanks in advance...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks Marc! Yea, that's how I have it currently (load in the xml and write it out to another xmldoc by using the create, appends and prepend methods), but it just seems a bit clunky to me. I'll take a look at your article...
|
|
|
|
|
I'm in the process of writing a program that has many MDI children to it. Some of the functions for each child are the same, such as close and print. Where I have the problem is getting a print option to work correctly.
I've looked at creating a File -> Print menu option in the MDI parent but I can't figure out how to get that to point to a proceedure in the MDI child (with the though that each child would have a proceedure with that name.) I can't figure out how to do this though.
The other option I looked at was to make a MainMenu on the parent with some items, and then have child-related item in a MainMenu item on the child form. The problem I am having with this approach is that I have File -> Close on the parent and when I try to add a File -> Print on the child, it creates two file menus. I've tried every combination of MergeType and MergeOrder I can think of in both the parent and child menus.
Is there something simple that I'm missing. I would think what I'm trying to accomplish here is pretty common. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
--In a world without fences, who needs Gates?
|
|
|
|
|
SignMan359 wrote:
I've looked at creating a File -> Print menu option in the MDI parent but I can't figure out how to get that to point to a proceedure in the MDI child (with the though that each child would have a proceedure with that name.) I can't figure out how to do this though.
I think that you are overcomplicating it. You don't need to implement a print method in every child window. You need to implement your print method in the MDI Parent code and have it print only the contents of the active child window (which ever child window has the focus).
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
