Survey Results

FirstPrev Next

Re: since when is naming conventions part of cls??? Bernhard2-May-05 22:44 Bernhard 2-May-05 22:44  Gosh.. always thought it's just the __ identifiers, which are reserved.. But in this case I may be wrong.. think some guru's always used _ for private variables.. but I don't know. All the label says is that this stuff contains chemicals "... known to the State of California to cause cancer in rats and low-income test subjects." Roger Wright http://www.codeproject.com/lounge.asp?select=965687&exp=5&fr=1#xx965687xx Re: since when is naming conventions part of cls??? Bernhard2-May-05 22:44 Bernhard 2-May-05 22:44  Gosh.. always thought it's just the __ identifiers, which are reserved.. But in this case I may be wrong.. think some guru always used _ for private variables.. but I don't know. All the label says is that this stuff contains chemicals "... known to the State of California to cause cancer in rats and low-income test subjects." Roger Wright http://www.codeproject.com/lounge.asp?select=965687&exp=5&fr=1#xx965687xx Re: since when is naming conventions part of cls??? worldspawn3-May-05 17:15 worldspawn 3-May-05 17:15  I dont get it. If i write code in C# and then compile it, how is this ever going to impact on VB.Net? [worldspawn] Re: since when is naming conventions part of cls??? Bob Stanneveld3-May-05 22:24 Bob Stanneveld 3-May-05 22:24  Imagine the small chance that you write some classes that you want other developers to use. These developers find your classes very usefull. Among these developers are some VB.NET programmers. They would not be able to use your class if it's not CLS compliant. In general, I don't think that one should bother too much about writing CLS compliant code. The most code you write isn't going to be reused anyway. But for the classes that tend to be reusable, the CLS standard should be considered. I also got the blogging virus..[^] Re: since when is naming conventions part of cls??? worldspawn4-May-05 13:18 worldspawn 4-May-05 13:18  OK makes sense. I tried putting [assembly:CLSCompliant(true)] in my code and it told be pretty much everything in my assembly was not compliant. But thats all it told me ("it" being the cs compiler). How are you supposed to know why your code is not CLS Compliant? [worldspawn] Re: since when is naming conventions part of cls??? Bob Stanneveld5-May-05 1:45 Bob Stanneveld 5-May-05 1:45  This[^] link is also in the poll title. It is a great starting point to learn about CLS. One other thing you could do is look the error up in MSDN. I also got the blogging virus..[^] Re: since when is naming conventions part of cls??? Thomas Freudenberg2-May-05 1:33 Thomas Freudenberg 2-May-05 1:33  MadHatter ¢ wrote: but since internals are often renamed The internals don't matter here, CLR compliance refers only to what you expose publicly in your assembly. Regards Thomas Disclaimer: Because of heavy processing requirements, we are currently using some of your unused brain capacity for backup processing. Please ignore any hallucinations, voices or unusual dreams you may experience. Please avoid concentration-intensive tasks until further notice. Thank you. FX Cop: the enforcer Almighty Bob2-May-05 14:34 Almighty Bob 2-May-05 14:34  I've been working on a Trunk Monkey add in to the .NET compilier. it detects crappy naming conventions and the monkey pops out and beats the developer over the head until they promise to not write ugly code... I can see that becomming a huge *hit* . /bb|[^b]{2}/

Last Visit: 31-Dec-99 18:00     Last Update: 1-May-24 6:51 Refresh ᐊ Prev123

General    News    Suggestion    Question    Bug    Answer    Joke    Praise    Rant    Admin   

Use Ctrl+Left/Right to switch messages, Ctrl+Up/Down to switch threads, Ctrl+Shift+Left/Right to switch pages.