|
COVID foreva
Lockdown foreva
Masks foreva
Fear foreva
|
|
|
|
|
Slacker007 wrote: COVID foreva
Lockdown foreva
Masks foreva
Fear foreva
Government control foeva. (Completed it for you)
|
|
|
|
|
A bogyman of your own imagination.
Congratulations. You fear your own dreams.
|
|
|
|
|
It's a very popular style: whatever the government does is equated to some sort of Orwellian overreach. It's easier than accepting that, like it or not, everyone does not have the right to do whatever they want. That the rights of other people in the world exist and may, at times, interfere with their own rights. That their decisions may negatively impact others. That . . . when it really comes down to it, their mindset is an endless "me first".
| Ravings en masse^ |
|---|
| "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
I know, right? Ask them for the last instance of "government control" and you get crickets.
In my humble opinion, the last time we ever came anywhere close to "government control" was when over 2 million people were drafted for the Vietnam war.
But according to them, "wear a mask?! Oh, the horror of government control!"
|
|
|
|
|
Don't forget the Science bit: the vaccine includes a government tracking chip that can monitor everything you do!
Without ever needing charging, although their mobile phone with a much, much bigger battery struggles to last a whole day ... and already monitors everything they say, and everywhere they go.
Consistency: that's probably fake news as well. 
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
I still get +8 points when you thumbs down my post. Awesome!! 
I am glad though, that it was you. Brings back memories of the Soapbox, and how much fun we had there.
|
|
|
|
|
W∴ Balboos, GHB wrote: hat the rights of other people in the world exist and may, at times, interfere with their own rights. That their decisions may negatively impact others.
Exactly... your rights end, where the rights of the next person start.
Here in Germany is really sad to see and to hear some people.
Heck... once in the hospital, medics coming to do the daily visit and a woman asking them to come back later because she was having a phone call.   Seriously? You are in the hospital not in an ![Elephant | [mastadon]](https://www.codeproject.com/script/Forums/Images/elephant.gif) ing spa
I partially welcome the new meassures:
You want to go somewhere? You have to prove your shot, your recovering or a test no older than 24 hours. And the free tests end next month. So... if you have not had it or you are not vacunated, you will have to pay for all the tests from your own money.
You go on holidays to a not "green" place, you come back and you have to do quarentine. You have COVID and you get ill, you have medical cover but you don't get sick leave (no money for the days you don't work).
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Got it correct there. 
Carrot
|
|
|
|
|
|
I love these B-List(C-List?) action movies from day of old.
|
|
|
|
|
Lockdowns are for prisons. Apparently Kiwis are all prisoners. I wonder if the crime they committed is trying to live free while voting for prison guards.
|
|
|
|
|
What emotional dribble. New Zealand for the last 18 months have pretty much been able to live very normal lives without much concern for COVID. The lockdowns are part of that fight for our freedom!
Modern day softies have lost sight of the need to fight and protect your country’s freedoms and are now too concerned with petty self interests.
A Fine is a Tax for doing something wrong
A Tax is a Fine for doing something good.
|
|
|
|
|
I hate to be critical, but that's just plain STUPID! Not saying you are, just the statement.
The mayor of New Orleans initiated a lockdown when covid first appeared. Restauranteurs and Bar owners, complained, but we wound up having the LOWEST infection rate in not only Louisiana, but all of the Southeastern U.S.
I wonder how many lives were saved?
Corporal Carrot
|
|
|
|
|
Today, I was reading a Code Project article about the announcement of the new eBPF Foundation.
I was taught in English 101 that the first time an abbreviation such a eBPF is used in an article, the author, as a courtesy to the reader and for clarity, should spell it out.
Now, somewhere along the line, I missed what eBPF stood for, so I had to go searching. It turned out that eBPF is an extension of BPF. So, my question became--"What the HELL is BPF?" And this lead to more searches to discover that the author was talking about "Berkeley Packet Filter".
So I am asking people to spell out what an abbreviation stands for the first time it is used or, as my mother would say, IWCOTABYA.
|
|
|
|
|
rjmoses wrote: And this leadled to
FTFY. 
|
|
|
|
|
On the other hand, if you spell out what the initialism/acronym stands for every time you use it, then you might as well not use it at all. 
I used to laugh whenever I watched one of the many UK "traffic cops"-type shows, where they'd repeatedly refer to "ANPR, which stands for Automated Number Plate Recognition". If you're going to say that every time, you might as well drop the "ANPR, which stands for" part.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
You couldn't be more wrong. Only one time, when first mentioned, is all it takes.
No one can know the meaning of every acronym. Particularly when applied to the myriad of software and hardware items in the dev universe.
And Yes, with cut and paste I am in favor of doing away with acronyms.
Zaphod
|
|
|
|
|
Slow Eddie wrote: You couldn't be more wrong. Only one time, when first mentioned, is all it takes.
Which is basically the point I was making.
If you give the definition and initialism on the first use, and then use the initialism from then on, that's fine.
If you use the initialism without defining it, that's not good.
But if you use both every time, that's also not good.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
In fairness to the OP ...
Quote: to spell out what an abbreviation stands for the first time it is used
|
|
|
|
|
Just spell it out the first time you use it and then put the acronym in parenthesis.
|
|
|
|
|
Please explain what “UK” means. 😂
|
|
|
|
|
Typically when people are doing something for free, and then you turn it into a chore, they have a tendency to stop doing it completely.
Appreciate what you are given, or start paying for it.
And yes, I understand you are just offering some general constructive criticism, but when you start trying to please everyone, that's what makes it become a chore.
|
|
|
|
|
Sometimes an article's author - and I'm not just talking about CP here - assumes some knowledge about the matter being discussed. It all depends on who the target audience is.
If I'm reading an article from Science magazine, I'd welcome what you're suggesting, because I'm probably not already familiar with the lingo or even some of the concepts being discussed.
But as a Windows developer who reads a lot of documentation and many articles, I could see that becoming very annoying, very fast.
But I suppose that's where HTML comes in, unlike a printed sheet of paper...if you're not familiar with an acronym, perhaps it could have some hover text that spells it out. That way it doesn't change the flow of the article and you can skip right over it if you don't need an explanation.
Somehow I was just reminded when HTML was being introduced, and a buddy of mine had a similar thought, but taken to an extreme...his idea was that HTML meant that we could have every single word in an article link to its dictionary definition. Now that is abusing a tool...
|
|
|
|
|
dandy72 wrote: perhaps it could have some hover text that spells it out.
Now that's a really good idea!
dandy72 wrote: HTML
"Go forth into the source" - Neal Morse
"Hope is contagious"
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
