|
92. Terribly rich with song (5)
|
|
|
|
|
Choir ?
We can’t stop here, this is bat country - Hunter S Thompson RIP
|
|
|
|
|
|
So society has basically burned to the ground since I posted here regularly. One thing I see a lot is older people sure they know 'the truth' based on something they saw on YouTube. Certainly news sources seem a lot more partisan to me than they used to be and it's hard to find unbiased news as opposed to seeking out world events filtered through either side of politics.
So, where do you get your news? Or are you just hiding under a rock waiting for the storm to pass?
|
|
|
|
|
I quit watching the news a few years ago. In order to do that I have to be ok with not being up on current events. In my situation I can be, and nobody knows I don't know what's going on. This keeps me at least not fretting about that. I have enough to be concerned with without the cares of the world.
|
|
|
|
|
Thing is, something big, like Notre Dame, will appear on my feed. I generally know when someone famous dies the same way.
|
|
|
|
|
Christian Graus wrote: like Notre Dame
Christian Graus wrote: when someone famous dies the same way.
What famous people have died by being engulfed in flames while being renovated? I can't believe I missed that!!
Socialism is the Axe Body Spray of political ideologies: It never does what it claims to do, but people too young to know better keep buying it anyway. (Glenn Reynolds)
|
|
|
|
|
same, given up watching the news.
even less watch the news talk/analysis shows because those are all about ratings rather than truth, don't wanna soapbox it but how often have these 'wise' analysts been wrong about the Don, brexit, China... wrong far more often than right even to the point of embellishing untruths? Farking clueless the lot of them. (Line them up next toin front of (save bullets) the movie critics - another waste of skin that lot are.)
|
|
|
|
|
In fairness, people who were going to vote for Trump or Brexit, knew they were racists and lied to people taking polls.
|
|
|
|
|
Scores of years ago I started listening to SW news - every country had an English service.
That's where I heard so many versions of the same story - and watched as stores evolved (not the event, but how it was spun) as each weasel nation tried to look blameless.
In a sense, part of what you speak of is business-as-usual.
What's changed is the availability of a means for anybody to be heard by scillions (perhaps zillions) of people. Post what you want - it may be looked at; adopted; repeated; embellished.
One thing that's become apparent - the democratization of a having a world-wide voice isn't necessarily a good thing. Not, at least, if it's available to everyone - the same people we call 'users" don't suddenly develop brains in how they operate
| Ravings en masse^ |
|---|
| "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
Same here. I have enough to worry about close to home, without getting my nuts in the grinder over the to-do in Washington or elsewhere.
Software Zen: delete this;
|
|
|
|
|
Gary Wheeler wrote: I have enough to worry about close to home, without getting my nuts in the grinder over the to-do in Washington or elsewhere.
I view it as entertainment, these days.
OK, so we're getting closer and closer to jackboot governments, but you've gotta laugh, haven't you?
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
'news' - it's interesting what passes for 'news' these days .. most Aus TV channels at the moment think its
a) anything to do with the upcoming election
b) anything to do with Royals, MAFS, Kardashians
my 2c, c) none of the above (and YouTube would be the LAST source of 'truth')
'g'
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, I don't even watch news much any more. I generally hear if Channel 7 does something particularly racist but otherwise, I don't pay attention. I do keep tabs on the political parties we have now (Anning is recruiting members, there's a ton of other fringe lunatic parties appearing), so I know about things like the recent flap over solar cars, but I don't watch any actual news source.
|
|
|
|
|
Mostly old-school:
1. Local paper delivered every morning.
2. Sunday New York Times (also delivered).
3. Twitter 'Trends for you'.
|
|
|
|
|
The paper here is awful. I read The Guardian online. The local paper has a subscription model now, and I respect their right to try to stay profitable, but they publish nothing I'd be willing to pay to read....
|
|
|
|
|
Most local papers are really not that good (mine included). I think of my subscription as a donation trying to save an endangered species. They are most likely doomed, but it's a worthy cause nevertheless.
|
|
|
|
|
Christian Graus wrote: I read The Guardian online
This is the one publication (I refuse to call it a 'newspaper') I wouldn't touch with the proverbial barge pole. They make CNN and the BBC look positively unbiased. Their writers are progressive-left-wing liberals who look at every problem through the prism of identity politics.
"There are two ways of constructing a software design: One way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies, and the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies. The first method is far more difficult." - C.A.R. Hoare
Home | LinkedIn | Google+ | Twitter
|
|
|
|
|
As far as I can tell the only thing the news is interested in these days is the Bachelor and MAFS.
I stick to PhysOrg.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Oh, God. I am still confused by the juxtaposition of the suggestion that gay marriage has made marriage meaningless, and MAFS. I saw a lot of chatter about 'teachable moments' in MAFS, but I ignored it. I still couldn't tell you who was on it.
And now we have 'bachelor in paradise', there's just an endless stream of them. On the good side, have you been paying attention is nearly on again.....
|
|
|
|
|
Christian Graus wrote: have you been paying attention is nearly on again
I didn't notice. I probably wasn't paying attention...
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Christian Graus wrote: MAFS
What's that? Some Aussie thing?
#SupportHeForShe
Government can give you nothing but what it takes from somebody else. A government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take everything you've got, including your freedom.-Ezra Taft Benson
You must accept 1 of 2 basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe or we are not alone. Either way, the implications are staggering!-Wernher von Braun
|
|
|
|
|
Oz TV is about 40% reality shows (really f***ing bad reality shows apparently) 40% reruns of old comedies and the rest if touted as news with some sports thrown in.
I had to look up what MAFS was for - Married at First Sight, I thankfully have no idea what the content is like.
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity -
RAH
I'm old. I know stuff - JSOP
|
|
|
|
|
ugh. Sounds dreadfully dull.
#SupportHeForShe
Government can give you nothing but what it takes from somebody else. A government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take everything you've got, including your freedom.-Ezra Taft Benson
You must accept 1 of 2 basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe or we are not alone. Either way, the implications are staggering!-Wernher von Braun
|
|
|
|
|
News stopped being news long ago, when it stopped being an obligation put on TV channels in return for broadcast slots and started having to make its own money. At that point, it was all over but the lying. You can't make money taking a nuanced approach to every issue based on the specifics. You make money by polarizing people and keeping them on your side of the playing field by any means necessary.
Then of course enter the internet where every wingnut on the planet can hold forth with 'the truth'. Some of those may actually believe the non-sense they spew, and many are not different from the major 'news' outlets.
Not that there aren't people in the news business who I'm sure would love to do real news in the old fashioned way, and there are probably some who manage to. But that's an expensive proposition and no one wants to pay for it anymore. The internet has screwed them just like it's screwed so many people. They can work themselves to a heart attack to chase down some major story, and it'll just get stolen and re-posted all over the net and the person who did the work will get little in return for his or her efforts.
There are many days where I think that the internet's positives don't remotely outweigh its negatives. It's a major reason why so many things are negatively affecting us here as well. It's slowly but surely pushing us all back to the centralized scenario, where we can only rent software. It's funny (in a sad way) that the PC revolution was to get software out of the hands of 'evil corporations' and give it to the people. But, ultimately, the people are arguably even more morality-free because they are not under any regulatory scrutiny, allowing them to screw us all by making it harder and harder to make money actually creating something and selling it.
And another big irony is that the 'making money by spying on your customers' thing, and renting out software at scale, really only works for big businesses. So the end result of the PC revolution is basically moving inexorably towards reversing the PC revolution and taking us right back where we were, only far worse now because now software is core to our way of life.
Meet the new boss.
Explorans limites defectum
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
