|
Being too lazy to do your own research IS an indication of a bad engineer.
It is only when you have researched and boiled a problem down to a single, distinct question, that you seek the help of senior engineers. If I hadn't done that in my early days I would have got a roasting, and rightfully so!
|
|
|
|
|
I agree with that statement. Now answer me this:
How is "my program is telling me a conversion between const char and LPCTSTR isn't available" not a single, distinct question? That's pretty precise from what I see on these forums.
modified 11-Dec-16 5:53am.
|
|
|
|
|
Can you two just hold the conversation for 15 minutes?
I wanna just pop out and get some popcorn ...
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
I have some "special" brownies. Would you like some?
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you for the offer, but they tend not to like people who transport them across international borders!
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
+1 for making me actually lol. That's just an implementation detail; surely you can hack your way past that
|
|
|
|
|
Ah the brownies. You remind me of my University days.
|
|
|
|
|
Not a single question?
This is what he asked "we want to debug GASChedule. But it not starting on visual studio 2015. we got some errors."
He got COMPILE errors. He doesnt even know the difference between compiling and executing!
The OP doesnt have the first clue about what he is doing, hence my deservedly direct reply.
|
|
|
|
|
Try using a const wchar_t . I'm no expert on character encoding but a char is vastly different from a wchar_t . char is based on ANSI, wchar_t is based on Unicode. Hope this helps
|
|
|
|
|
Open up the version before migration in VS 2012 or VS 2010 and it should be fine. Migrating to 2015 will force you to fix the above errors.
|
|
|
|
|
By ZiffDavisResearch.com. Fascinating!
|
|
|
|
|
Next clue please.
Peter Wasser
"The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts." - Bertrand Russell
|
|
|
|
|
How many letters?
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: How many letters?
hundreds, thousands, millions ....
that's why it's called spam
Sin tack ear lol
Pressing the "Any" key may be continuate
|
|
|
|
|
It was posted there.
The sh*t I complain about
It's like there ain't a cloud in the sky and it's raining out - Eminem
~! Firewall !~
|
|
|
|
|
There used to be a time when I liked ZiffDavis, as in the good old days of ZDTV! The Screen Savers - Wikipedia[^]
It's true! In '98 I was just getting back into computing/programming after a decade away from school and had gotten my first Windows PC with VS6! Everything was new and exciting back then!
"Go forth into the source" - Neal Morse
|
|
|
|
|
Okay, one part for my supercharger project came in the mail yesterday. Not quite a flood, but, exciting nonetheless.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
- You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
- When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
Small part, or big mailbox?
Ignore me, I'm commiserating - Canada Post won't even put something as small as a CD in my mailbox and makes me drive a few miles to go pick up packages that would clearly fit in it (and that's my first world problem of the day)...
|
|
|
|
|
dandy72 wrote: Canada ... first world
Ummm... what?
|
|
|
|
|
he's building a MadMax car
Charlie Gilley
<italic>Stuck in a dysfunctional matrix from which I must escape...
"Where liberty dwells, there is my country." B. Franklin, 1783
“They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
this big good right hahaha
|
|
|
|
|
Sometimes being dyslexic is so interesting!
New version: WinHeist Version 2.2.2 Beta I told my psychiatrist that I was hearing voices in my head. He said you don't have a psychiatrist!
|
|
|
|
|
Okay, so I'm working with a team that's (relatively) young and like to do things "the right way". This means Agile (naturally!), unit tests written up front, acceptance tests (Gherkin) too..
The problem is that very little gets delivered. In the last two week sprint, 160 points were promised but only 40 delivered. Same in the previous sprint. There's a bit of worry as they're working on a mission critical project that needs to be delivered in a couple of months.
Personally, I think they're missing one major point mentioned in the Agile manifesto, in that..
We are uncovering better ways of developing software by doing it and helping others do it.
Through this work we have come to value:
Individuals and interactions over processes and tools
Working software over comprehensive documentation
Customer collaboration over contract negotiation
Responding to change over following a plan
That is, while there is value in the items on the right, we value the items on the left more.
We're ending up with the situation that writing tests and refactoring is taking the bulk of the time. Things are being (IMO) over-tested and (also IMO) and there's an over-reliance on unit/acceptance testing to pick up all defects - real bugs are being missed and picked up at the point of actual system testing (or even worse, demo).
On top of that, we've got developers going in changing working code simply because they think it should be done differently (in their opinion, better). And, if there's a complex way to write simple code you can bet this team will find it..
Has anyone else run into this? What was done to get the team focused on the important deliverables? I would like to understand how we can get away from delivering tests but very little product every two weeks..
Ah, I see you have the machine that goes ping. This is my favorite. You see we lease it back from the company we sold it to and that way it comes under the monthly current budget and not the capital account.
modified 31-Aug-21 21:01pm.
|
|
|
|