Welcome to the Lounge

13-Sep-13 4:11

Same as instructions except instead of in is de

De -> Defensive end
Poke tongue | ;-P

Loading signature...

. . . Please Wait . . .

YAWOTD

Dalek Dave13-Sep-13 3:28

Dalek Dave

13-Sep-13 3:28

"Instructions"

1 Pointless packaging disposed of before installation.
2 Booklet or pamphlet only vaguely glanced at, whilst alone, three quarters of the way through an installation.
3 Vitally important document that needs retrieving from the bin once it is realised that the installation cannot possibly be this hard.

---------------------------------
Obscurum per obscurius.
Ad astra per alas porci.
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur.

CBadger13-Sep-13 3:38

13-Sep-13 3:38

Dalek Dave wrote:
"Instructions"

Easy:

In -> Expressing the situation of something that is or appears to be enclosed or surrounded by something else
Struct -> a value type that is typically used to encapsulate small groups of related variables, such as the coordinates of a rectangle or the characteristics of an item in an inventory.
Ions - > Multiple atoms or molecules with a net electric charge due to the loss or gain of one or more electrons.

Hope this helps Cool | :cool:

Loading signature...

. . . Please Wait . . .

OriginalGriff13-Sep-13 4:04

OriginalGriff

13-Sep-13 4:04

Ah! So:

object[] Instructions = new object[] {(object) new Ion(), (object) new Ion()};

Since it has boxed the two Ion structure instances...

This message is manufactured from fully recyclable noughts and ones. To recycle this message, please separate into two tidy piles, and take them to your nearest local recycling centre.
Please note that in some areas noughts are always replaced with zeros by law, and many facilities cannot recycle zeroes - in this case, please bury them in your back garden and water frequently.

CBadger13-Sep-13 4:09

13-Sep-13 4:09

You sir are quite the GENIUS

Geni -> A hereditary unit consisting of a sequence of DNA that occupies a specific location on a chromosome and determines a particular characteristic in an organism. Genes undergo mutation when their DNA sequence changes.
Us -> Used by a speaker to refer to himself or herself and one or more other people as the object of a verb or preposition

Suspicious | :suss:

Loading signature...

. . . Please Wait . . .

lewax0013-Sep-13 4:20

lewax00

13-Sep-13 4:20

I feel like this could lead to a new form of the CCC.

AWOTD

Brisingr Aerowing13-Sep-13 3:18

Brisingr Aerowing

13-Sep-13 3:18

Another Word Of The Day

ATAD - When the data you have is the opposite of what you need.

Keep Clam And Proofread
--
√(-1) 2³ ∑ π...
And it was delicious.

CBadger13-Sep-13 3:33

13-Sep-13 3:33

Incorrect, the opposite of data is variable[^] Poke tongue | ;-P

ATAD is when the data you have is the REVERSE of what you need Laugh | :laugh:

Loading signature...

. . . Please Wait . . .

Mark_Wallace13-Sep-13 3:39

Mark_Wallace

13-Sep-13 3:39

CBadger wrote:
Incorrect, the opposite of data is variable[^]

???

You populate variables with data.

I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!

CBadger13-Sep-13 3:50

13-Sep-13 3:50

You son must go back to school of sarcasm

you must click to follow the link you know Sleepy | :zzz:

Link wrote:
The opposite of "data," which means "given things, known facts" might be "unknowns, variables, or conjectures."

Loading signature...

. . . Please Wait . . .

Mark_Wallace13-Sep-13 5:56

Mark_Wallace

13-Sep-13 5:56

Ah, I get your point.

Someone said it on an Internet noticeboard, so it must be true.

I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!

Septimus Hedgehog13-Sep-13 3:55

Septimus Hedgehog

13-Sep-13 3:55

Variable? Which violates the First Law of Programming: variables don't; constants aren't.

If there is one thing more dangerous than getting between a bear and her cubs it's getting between my wife and her chocolate.

CBadger13-Sep-13 4:05

13-Sep-13 4:05

SeptimusEjjog 151576 wrote:
First Law of Programming

Not true.
Here is the First Law Of Programming[^]
Poke tongue | ;-P

Loading signature...

. . . Please Wait . . .

OriginalGriff13-Sep-13 4:15

OriginalGriff

13-Sep-13 4:15

Nope, you're wrong as well: First Law Of Programming[^]

CBadger13-Sep-13 4:16

13-Sep-13 4:16

I submit.

Although then it can be: "Do not be an idiot."

Loading signature...

. . . Please Wait . . .

Brisingr Aerowing13-Sep-13 4:19

Brisingr Aerowing

13-Sep-13 4:19

Go Here[^]

Keep Clam And Proofread
--
√(-1) 2³ ∑ π...
And it was delicious.

Too Soon?

Dalek Dave13-Sep-13 3:14

Dalek Dave

13-Sep-13 3:14

For this kind of humour?[^]

---------------------------------
Obscurum per obscurius.
Ad astra per alas porci.
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur.

BobJanova13-Sep-13 3:19

BobJanova

13-Sep-13 3:19

I'd say 98 years was long enough really.

MehGerbil13-Sep-13 3:22

MehGerbil

13-Sep-13 3:22

It is a tasteless ad.
However, to be offended over it is to be insane.

I think the two sides are made for each other.

megaadam13-Sep-13 3:25

megaadam

13-Sep-13 3:25

I agree. Just poor taste. Nothing to do with soon or not.

Life is too shor

Dalek Dave13-Sep-13 3:30

Dalek Dave

13-Sep-13 3:30

"The ad has also outraged some of the relatives of the 1915 disaster which saw more than 1,500 lose their lives when the 'unsinkable' ship hit an iceberg in the North Atlantic. "

Perhaps this was a different Titanic to the one that sank in April 1912?

---------------------------------
Obscurum per obscurius.
Ad astra per alas porci.
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur.

CBadger13-Sep-13 3:58

13-Sep-13 3:58

Dalek Dave wrote:
Perhaps this was a different Titanic to the one that sank in April 1912

So now we must be outraged that we never even heard of this titanic that sank only 3 years after the Titanic we know of!!! Mad | :mad:

I must say they should indeed crucify and condemn everybody involved! They manage to sink a ship (named Titanic) 2X in only 3 years! SO how many did really die then?

Loading signature...

. . . Please Wait . . .