|
|
That's good information! I know a couple of gas stations around here offer E-15 fuel, but I didn't know that the unlabeled products also contain ethanol. I'll be sure to put a bit of Stabil in every tank! Thanks! 
Will Rogers never met me.
|
|
|
|
|
Roger, I wouldn't worry about the car so much, especially if you are a frequent driver. Anything built in the last 10 years was designed to deal with the higher temps and corrosive nature of ethanol. Definitely use the Stabil in anything else though. We have one chain of stations here that advertise ethanol free gas. It's the only place I get the gas I use for the mower, pressure washer, and weed eater, plus I use the Stabil since 5 gallons will last for a year or more.
"Go forth into the source" - Neal Morse
|
|
|
|
|
Roger Wright wrote: a Sears & Roebuck Craftsman Chipper/Shredder
Well, there's your problem.
The newer models are completely incompatible because they produce baby blocks, not chips/shreds.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
This one is hardly a "newer" model - it's been in the yard for 20+ years now, but hasn't been started in about 10.
Happily, I have all the necessary parts installed now, the carb is rebuilt, and I get a solid spark on the plug. Time to buy some gas and start the setup process.
Will Rogers never met me.
|
|
|
|
|
consuming SAP web services through WCF client is real pain in South? I finally gave up and added good old web service reference.
"Bastards encourage idiots to use Oracle Forms, Web Forms, Access and a number of other dinky web publishing tolls.", Mycroft Holmes[ ^]
|
|
|
|
|
I don't see why it would make a difference if you're in the South or the North.
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
You don't know SAP stands for South's Always Painful?
"Bastards encourage idiots to use Oracle Forms, Web Forms, Access and a number of other dinky web publishing tolls.", Mycroft Holmes[ ^]
|
|
|
|
|
In that case, you might need some of this: Preparation H[^]
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
Should I apply this on client side or server side?
"Bastards encourage idiots to use Oracle Forms, Web Forms, Access and a number of other dinky web publishing tolls.", Mycroft Holmes[ ^]
|
|
|
|
|
Right between them. 
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
I was thinking of putting a wrapper around server and applying this through visitor pattern on client side. This should give a nice little plug and play design.
"Bastards encourage idiots to use Oracle Forms, Web Forms, Access and a number of other dinky web publishing tolls.", Mycroft Holmes[ ^]
|
|
|
|
|
Get a room you two. 
Soren Madsen
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly" - Jase #DuckDynasty
|
|
|
|
|
SAP and WCF are curse words which should have been censored in your post.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm in France and listening online, there's a long (very long) section with a "Rights Restrictions" message rather than the radio, which is substantially rarer than hen's teeth on Radio 4.
So, is it an error or is there something very funky on R4 right now?
|
|
|
|
|
Warning C4715: not all control paths return a value
I remember when only the .NET languages had this warning/error, now they put it into the C++ compiler in VS 2012! Yea!
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
Is it worth updating to 2012 yet? I'm running 2010 and it's perfectly fine. Anything significant I should think about? I know Roslyn[^] only runs in 2012.
Also, I don't seem to ever encounter the sorts of problems people on here seem to, perhaps I don't have big enough projects 
.-.
|o,o|
,| _\=/_ .-""-.
||/_/_\_\ /[] _ _\
|_/|(_)|\\ _|_o_LII|_
\._. |\_/|"` |_| ==== |_|
|_|_| ||" || ||
|-|-| ||LI o ||
|_|_| ||'----'||
/_/ \_\ /__| |__\
|
|
|
|
|
2012 does seem more responsive and uses less memory. But the strongest reason for upgrading is the C++11 complaint compiler.
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
Richard Andrew x64 wrote: complaint compiler
It might complain about a few things based on your code, but it's also C++11 compliant!
"Real men drive manual transmission" - Rajesh.
|
|
|
|
|
Freudian slip, I guess! 
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
One big initial problem with VS2012 was that native C++ code could not target XP machines. Big show stopper if you have customers still using XP in some cases. That's been resolved with an update though.
The improved C++11 support would be a nice reason to upgrade.
I find, even with 2010, that it has issues at times with really large projects. Doing classwizard-type things (adding dialog member variables is a big one) will choke with really large projects - the UI just hangs. I keep thinking it'll get better with the next release, so maybe with 2012  I get the impression they do all their testing with trivially small test projects and don't really work with any larger scale solutions with large projects.
|
|
|
|
|
Dave Calkins wrote: I get the impression they do all their testing with trivially small test projects
MS test? 
I never knew...
This message is manufactured from fully recyclable noughts and ones. To recycle this message, please separate into two tidy piles, and take them to your nearest local recycling centre.
Please note that in some areas noughts are always replaced with zeros by law, and many facilities cannot recycle zeroes - in this case, please bury them in your back garden and water frequently.
|
|
|
|
|
That warning has been around for a while. Perhaps VS 2012 moved it to level 3.
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
] or i´m completely blind.. [edit]
)