|
Give em a pointer to arrays and they'll get it.
|
|
|
|
|
Well, one might ask for some pointers on increasing one's value, or failing that - ask for a reference.
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
If they don't get array is it OK for you to take the rise?
|
|
|
|
|
Yes.
Software Zen: delete this;
|
|
|
|
|
& Shorts.
How many of you have tried this on the video calls. (Of course, not showing the bottom half) 
|
|
|
|
|
I once watched a live news broadcast of some local event in La Jolla CA (a lovely coastal town of San Diego.) The newscaster was in a nice suit and tie on the top, and Hawaiian shorts on the bottom. 
|
|
|
|
|
Many years ago, two colleagues had Hawaiian shorts on during a video call with senior execs, and stood up just before the call ended.
|
|
|
|
|
Ah, stand-up comedians 
|
|
|
|
|
Sure, why not ?, but then again ... umm, no
Keep Calm and Carry On
|
|
|
|
|
The British public schoolboy look.
|
|
|
|
|
Morning Sickness
"I didn't mention the bats - he'd see them soon enough" - Hunter S Thompson - RIP
|
|
|
|
|
"Expecting" would be better. I guess the "with this" was supposed to evoke "with child"?
|
|
|
|
|
But it would have made it too obvious - OG solved it but didn't want to set tomorrows
"I didn't mention the bats - he'd see them soon enough" - Hunter S Thompson - RIP
|
|
|
|
|
The rest of us aren't OG. 
|
|
|
|
|
Other than "Expecting" being a term for pregnancy, I don't get the clue 
|
|
|
|
|
One of the downsides of being pregnant is Morning Sickness
"I didn't mention the bats - he'd see them soon enough" - Hunter S Thompson - RIP
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, I get that part. But what about "difficulty with this"?
If the whole thing is just the same clue, then that doesn't seem to match the cryptic format I am used to seeing here. Like I am looking for a definition, and then the other part is an alternatively way to "build" the same words... maybe that is still a valid approach though?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hi All,
Trying and failing to work from home due in part to the wet string broad band connection and the laptop I have, locked for my security. Having to use a 'Mini Hub' due to the broadband being unstable I find I can't use the mini-hub as the Work lappy will not see things plugged into the usb ports! So I have go to go into the Office to winge at IT and attend an Online meeting. I wanted to work from home today!
|
|
|
|
|
glennPattonContracting2 wrote: the Work lappy will not see things plugged into the usb ports!
this is a great security feature as some employees like to steal source code, etc. and put them on thumb drives.
My company has the laptop encrypted with Bitlocker and so if you store something on a USB device, it encrypts it, so that only the laptop can read it back again.
My company also installed extra security software to prevent uploading anything to non approved repos, etc. so stealing source code, etc. and uploading it to a personal drop box, cloud storage, git repo, etc. can't be done either.
My laptop is currently the most secure digital device I have had in my entire life, I think.
|
|
|
|
|
No camera phones either?
OCR on phone photos is entirely trivial.
Even better - thanks to Samsung's Fort Knox (I'm sure competitors have similar) you can put those photos into secure storage where the outside world don't shine and be done with it...
|
|
|
|
|
As any protection measure, it raises the required skill level and the cost of breaching them. It can't completely prevent intrusion by a skilled and motivated attacker.
GCS d--(d+) s-/++ a C++++ U+++ P- L+@ E-- W++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- r+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
|
|
|
|
|
Sure, I get that. The old saying, you can't prevent access, merely increase its cost has never been more true.
What is also true however, is that if you flaunt your distrust for those you rely upon, you're simply scheduling the time they'll bite you when they can. People that need said measures in order not to steal the company data weren't the best hires in the first place.
Oh. Right. Recruitment firms and HR.
Nevermind. I'm thinking about some alternate universe where these entities aren't dumber than a firehose. 
|
|
|
|
|
And consultants. Too many firms hire consultants as temporary workers, and consulence companies foster a mercenary environment - they parade us to customers singing our praises and overselling us , just like a pimp would do - so trust is hard to give.
GCS d--(d+) s-/++ a C++++ U+++ P- L+@ E-- W++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- r+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah nothing I hate more than uppers who barely know technology trusting people outside more than inside to make up for their deficiencies. And then implementing the practice when it is convenient to them not the rest of the workforce. Ever wonder why they cause the breach and programmers and IT folk get the claim. Mainly because they are given to much power in the workforce. I honestly can't wait till AI knocks out some of the random things people justify to keep themselves from having to learn on a daily basis. That magic excel sheet I want to blow up everyday and they feel the threat so they try to keep us oppressed in the workforce. A building pipe bursts "Ohh, that was just the weather we can deal with it". My email went down "Find the IT person and skewer them" for a cloud problem that is most of the time on a vendor a consultant recommended for hype. I don't feel business people really understand how to connect the dots and I hate the don't care make it work mentality. 
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
