|
You're gonna love this.
It's a lookup table for fiscal years! 
|
|
|
|
|
Jörgen Andersson wrote: It's a lookup table for fiscal years
In a previous response, you mentioned that the year table only has two columns. Am I to assume that a fiscal year is the same as a calendar year in your situation?
Mine are not...customers either start their year June 1 or September 1.
"Go forth into the source" - Neal Morse
|
|
|
|
|
No it isn't. It's from september to August.
Mind, I never claimed the database is well designed.
Everything, and I really mean everything except one table, is done using surrogate keys. Including many that doesn't need it.
Just one table is done using a natural key, that isn't.
Surrogate keys are a safe bet though. They're never plain wrong even if they're not necessarily the best choice. But it can get ridiculous.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, I'va made a nice living cleaning up engineering evaluatuiions that other companies started and couldn't finish. In every case hundreds, when I finally got to the root of the problem, it was always the one thinbg that everyone assumed without checking. Every time!
Now, whenever I start looking at a project, the first thing I do, is start asking fir proof that ALL of the assumptions are warranted. Usually, once we get to the critical one, the project manager sighs and says well now we can fix it ourselves. That's fine by me, I already charged my time and I can work on something really challenging!
CQ de W5ALT
Walt Fair, Jr., P. E.
Comport Computing
Specializing in Technical Engineering Software
modified 23-Oct-18 19:35pm.
|
|
|
|
|
assume makes a ass out u and me
|
|
|
|
|
More to the point, why do we insist on using f*** to represent what we all know it actually means? Same as c***; 99% of English speaking readers, I’d wager, know exactly what word this represents. What’s wrong with using c**k up if we want to supposedly sanitise the written word? Asking for a friend! 😂
modified 6-Sep-22 21:01pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Damn! Even the shortened version of a male hen is obscured. I’m living in a world of censorship
modified 6-Sep-22 21:01pm.
|
|
|
|
|
How about the long version, cockerel?
|
|
|
|
|
Sounds much better; the mother of all cockerel ups! 😂
modified 6-Sep-22 21:01pm.
|
|
|
|
|
To answer your question, it's all about keeping the site white-listed in various filters employed by companies.
|
|
|
|
|
https://www.foxnews.com/us/new-jersey-mom-credited-with-stopping-potential-school-shooting-in-kentucky[^]
Quote: “I’m not a guardian angel. I’m not a hero," she said. "I’m a mom."
Uh, yeah, you are. By definition.
MOM = guardian angel
MOM = hero
#SupportHeForShe
Government can give you nothing but what it takes from somebody else. A government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take everything you've got, including your freedom.-Ezra Taft Benson
You must accept 1 of 2 basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe or we are not alone. Either way, the implications are staggering!-Wernher von Braun
|
|
|
|
|
Awesome mom!
an Internet history that included a search for how to carry out a school shooting.
What kind of sick person would post crap like that. 
Latest Article - A Concise Overview of Threads
Learning to code with python is like learning to swim with those little arm floaties. It gives you undeserved confidence and will eventually drown you. - DangerBunny
Artificial intelligence is the only remedy for natural stupidity. - CDP1802
|
|
|
|
|
Not to take anything away from this story, but as I read and break down the article:
- She received nasty messages from a stranger about her kids
- She called the cops
That's it. That's the end of her involvement. Then,
- Cops check out the guy
- Cops happen to run into him as he was leaving his house to perpetrate a massacre
I mean, that's fantastic and all, but if lucky circumstances like these--and that's what they are--make her a "hero", then what does that make of, I dunno, people who actually, knowingly put their lives in danger for the sake of others?
I mean...yeah, lets thank her profusely, but if you can get a medal for dumb luck, by the same logic, why not award medals to lottery winners? I fail to see the heroic act. That's all I'm trying to say.
Now watch my words get twisted, and my intent misconstrued...
|
|
|
|
|
Twisted words aside, I think you are right. The word "hero" is bandied about a bit too loosely these days in my opinion.
|
|
|
|
|
But not as badly as 'snowflake.'
|
|
|
|
|
I agree. I would reply with what I really think about that but this is not The Soapbox.
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, I actually agree with the points you made. What I was trying to say is that all good Moms are angels and heros, regardless of that Mom's denial of being one.
#SupportHeForShe
Government can give you nothing but what it takes from somebody else. A government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take everything you've got, including your freedom.-Ezra Taft Benson
You must accept 1 of 2 basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe or we are not alone. Either way, the implications are staggering!-Wernher von Braun
|
|
|
|
|
Well, there's that aspect. The life-long self-sacrifices mothers make outweigh the "deservedness" of the label this particular article was trying to assign (for the wrong reasons).
|
|
|
|
|
I think it's fair to say this was something that any given person should have done.
Sadly, the law enforcement agency deserves some applause for actually doing its job, which is all too rare lately.
"Never attribute to malice that which can be explained by stupidity."
- Hanlon's Razor
|
|
|
|
|
How true.
An underfunded/understaffed department might have delayed the dispatch. Maybe it actually was delayed, but still got there in time--there's no mention in the article that the response was immediate (that I recall - I'd have to go back to it and pay attention to the wording).
|
|
|
|
|
Anyone know of some sort of Android app review site (beyond the Google Play store itself) where people can freely post their opinions on any app? One that isn't influenced by the software's author(s) or whatever Google gives preference to on any given week.
It really looks like the Play Store's download figures and user ratings are turning into completely irrelevant data points when it comes to trustworthiness. Whether they ever were or not is besides the point. Something could have been downloaded tens of millions of times, and rated 4.5+ out of 5, but a given app's actual real-life behavior can still raise some serious questions. I'm seriously beginning to think the Play Store itself is turning into a cesspool of...well, I'm gonna keep this kid-sister friendly as per lounge rules. If Google's ranking can't be trusted, then whose can?
Specifically:
I've have a QR code scanner app, which shall remain nameless, installed on my tablet for years. I honestly can't recall the last time I've used it however. But, I do let the Play store update installed apps regularly.
According to the Settings/App Data Usage applet, which only goes back to June, this is this one app's usage:
Jun: 0 (no surprise - it hasn't been launched since at least that many months ago)
Jul: 10.44MB
Aug: 721MB
Sep: 506MB
Oct: 558MB (so far)
According to the App Info applet, the app only has permission to access the camera (makes sense, as it's a QR reader). So it shouldn't be able to access my videos, pictures, contacts, or upload any data back home. Even if it was explicitly given permission, the tablet is hardly ever used; it's spending most of its time in sleep mode. Or running, but with the screen powered down.
WTE can such an app be doing, transferring over half a GB a month, when the tablet itself is essentially idling 24/7?
People incessantly complain about whatever "unknown things" Windows is constantly doing behind their backs in the background. This is a drop in the ocean IMO when compared to the Android ecosystem (to borrow one of MS's favorite terms)...
|
|
|
|
|
Could it be a bug with the updates?
Not saying this is the case since QR reader apps are some of the worst when it comes to sleazy permission abuse. However, the Google News app has a rather nasty bug which chews up data, even if it is set to Wifi only. Ref: ZDNet article[^].
|
|
|
|
|
RJOberg wrote: Could it be a bug with the updates?
As I understand it, when it comes to updates, the data usage would be attributed to the Play Store app, not the app itself.
|
|
|
|
|
The bug with the Google News app is because the app itself is pulling down absolute loads of data after a recent update. Curious if the QR reader you use is doing the same thing.
|
|
|
|
|
Depends how "recent" that is. Based on the numbers I posted in my original message, this goes back a few months.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
