|
What would that make John McAfee if bitcoin doesn't hit $1B by 2020? 
"Go forth into the source" - Neal Morse
|
|
|
|
|
Oh I can't stomach cannibals.
|
|
|
|
|
Some may find that reasoning hard to swallow.
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
Full of self-recrimination 
|
|
|
|
|
My heart goes out for those victims. Oh, wait. NOOOOOOO...
|
|
|
|
|
Eating people only makes them human.
|
|
|
|
|
Function after function, consisting of little more than an assert, a line of code, maybe, and another function call.
On and on and on you search, looking for code that actually DOES something!
|
|
|
|
|
Sometimes I even wrote code like that. With C++ it's fairly common due to the class architecture, and sometimes unavoidable if we are to respect OOP.
I still hate it, though.
GCS d-- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L+@ E-- W++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- ++>+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
|
|
|
|
|
that's not C++. that's coders who are afraid of functions with more than 15 lines.
come on over to my world, where i'm looking at C functions that sometimes hit 1000 lines.
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Losinger wrote: come on over to my world, where i'm looking at C functions that sometimes hit 1000 lines.
Don't, I am getting excited! 
|
|
|
|
|
Munchies_Matt wrote: Don't, I am getting excited!
Until you are the one who has to debug them.
Then you're excited in a whole new way. 
|
|
|
|
|
It sounds like you support functions with 1000 lines over 15 lines. Extracting out discrete segments of logic into non-public methods/functions not only improves readability but allows you to abstract "complex logic" into an understandable name so new developers can digest it easier.
A caveat, as always, especially since you mention C: If it's for a functional performance requirement, I can't really fault massive functions. I can't seem to find the article but I remember years ago a game engine had to collapse its entire render stack into a single function to improve performance.
|
|
|
|
|
if i was King Lord Programmer here i'd forbid any functions with more than 250 lines.
alas, i am not.
|
|
|
|
|
I agree with you but I would be inclined to place the limit at 200.
|
|
|
|
|
If your slogan was "no functions over 250 lines", I'd vote for you  Oooo, or "Even books have chapters."
|
|
|
|
|
Jon McKee wrote: If your slogan was "no functions over 250 lines", I'd vote for you Oooo, or "Even books have chapters."
That wouldn't help, you don't vote for Kings.
Michael Martin
Australia
"I controlled my laughter and simple said "No,I am very busy,so I can't write any code for you". The moment they heard this all the smiling face turned into a sad looking face and one of them farted. So I had to leave the place as soon as possible."
- Mr.Prakash One Fine Saturday. 24/04/2004
|
|
|
|
|
If you cast your vote with a pitchfork or a password reset you do 
|
|
|
|
|
3 layers deep is all you need to go.
1st layer: Entry points
2nd layer: logic
3rd layer: detailed code
|
|
|
|
|
Ah, yes. The DoEverythingAndThisAndAlsoThatAndOhThisOtherThingAsWell() function. 
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Losinger wrote: come on over to my world, where i'm looking at C functions that sometimes hit 1000 lines.
That's nothing! My record is over 1700 comment lines before the first line of code.
|
|
|
|
|
|
I am actually beginning to hate C++ as well, but the reasons you mention have nothing to do with the language. Try reading some typical Java "enterprise" code and finding a method that actually does something.
|
|
|
|
|
From your post, it would seem that you hate C++ because of how someone else writes Java "enterprise" code.
I suppose that makes some sense somewhere somehow to someone.
| Ravings en masse^ |
|---|
| "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
And what this has todo with C++? It's more a programming style than a Need in C++ 
It does not solve my Problem, but it answers my question
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry for mentioning something simplistic, but I think immediately about call graphs …
When I used VC++ 4 or 5 I was extremely impressed by the call graph features … back then ,
I found them very handy, of course … I missed them in early VC#, and they resurfaced
at some point in VC# editions (in last 10 years I think ...), BR
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
