|
Seems that comments on articles are not sent to the author anymore automatically.
NetZ is still around, be it in a somewhat dormant state, the source code is available on GitHub but no one seems interested in it anymore, what a pity.
I did one simple test with a .NET 4.0 application, and got that working.
I know about ILMerge and Fody Costura, and have put those to good use already, the interesting thing about NetZ however is that it zips and encrypts your application which might offer some level of protection.
|
|
|
|
|
I share your pain, I have an installer that 'updates' a certain dll to a version that was released when the earth was hot. The worst thing is that version of the dll doesn't have voodoo for the program to work...
|
|
|
|
|
But should you do voodoo?
veni bibi saltavi
|
|
|
|
|
HooDoo you do it otherwise??
|
|
|
|
|
Do do that voodoo - now go do that voodoo that you do so well.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
|
If that's the same "unblock" option you get for files downloaded from the internet, you just need to delete the "Zone.Identifier" alternate data stream.
If only someone had written a library[^] to let you do that easily... 
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Is this a managed (.NET) dll or a COM Dll or classic dll (neither COM nor .NET -- native dll)?
I'm assuming it is a managed DLL. However, if it is a COM dll that you have a dependency upon you may find some other requirements for that item which are causing the problem.
Edit
Here's something else interesting:
Applications that receive less than full trust from their host or sandbox are not allowed to call shared managed libraries unless the library writer specifically allows them to through the use of the AllowPartiallyTrustedCallersAttribute attribute. Therefore, application writers must be aware that some libraries will not be available to them from a partially trusted context. By default, all code that executes in a partial-trust sandbox and is not in the list of full-trust assemblies is partially trusted
|
|
|
|
|
raddevus wrote: Here's something else interesting:
Do you really trust that info to accurate?
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote: Do you really trust that info to accurate?
Well it is from Microsoft...so mostly not. 
However, I thought maybe it would lead to something that might help.
|
|
|
|
|
It probably was accurate during beta testing. Now, a few releases and updates later - I would be seriously surprised if it was.
|
|
|
|
|
Get a sturdier and softer desk?
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
That's just cruel. With an adequately hard desk, at least you have the bliss of unconsciousness to look forward to.
Software Zen: delete this;
|
|
|
|
|
Dangerously close to a programming question, sir!
PooperPig - Coming Soon
|
|
|
|
|
Hi All,
I looks like I will be forced down the snake route, so as some one who has an ammount of Vis Studio experience (VB, VB.NET, C#) and a very solid background in C is there a route other than the Python for Beginners book I have gone through that basically give you an overview and simple examples rather than this is how you automate X with it. I mean I can write a text adventure, not automate things. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
Merky Bucket  or Khosoenoem (according to the Hungarian guy across the office) 
modified 24-Apr-18 6:49am.
|
|
|
|
|
This may help: Amazon[^] Chapter nineteen seems particularly relevant from what I've seen of Python so far.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Believe or not I was whistling 'I'm a Lumberjack' while downloading it...
|
|
|
|
|
And later on you will do the full Monty 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dive Into Python - either for Python3 or Python2. IMO, Python3 is preferable - it's just about become the mainstream Python version - after nearly a decade since the first 3.0 release...
In addition - use tools like PyLint to check your code for issues that won't be found until runtime (if you're lucky!)... My favoured setup is to use Visual Studio Code, as it has a solid Python extension builtin (IIRC - easy enough to install if not) with pylint for checking and autopep8 to format my code (although yapf looks like it might do a more aesthetically pleasing job... Have to look at that!).
And then you'll want to get familiar with pip, or something slightly more sophisticated like pipenv.
Java, Basic, who cares - it's all a bunch of tree-hugging hippy cr*p
|
|
|
|
|
I only found this *after* actually learning and using Python for some time: Obey The Testing Goat[^]. But I think it's a fantastic resource, not only for learning Python but for learning how to take a test-first approach.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
