Welcome to the Lounge

OriginalGriff wrote:

you can't use Linq properly without it

MyModel _currentModel = _myModelList.Find(Mml => Mml.IdModel == InIdOfModel);

if(!string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(_signature))
{
    MessageBox.Show("This is my signature: " + Environment.NewLine + _signature);
}
else
{
    MessageBox.Show("404-Signature not found");
}

Nathan Minier wrote:

Hungarian notation

Quote:

Linus Torvalds

“Encoding the type of a function into the name (so-called Hungarian notation) is brain damaged – the compiler knows the types anyway and can check those, and it only confuses the programmer.”

if(!string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(_signature))
{
    MessageBox.Show("This is my signature: " + Environment.NewLine + _signature);
}
else
{
    MessageBox.Show("404-Signature not found");
}

Nathan Minier wrote:

(PS: You could answer it with "Go look at the declaration, fool!")

Sander Rossel wrote:

Unless you're serious, in which case I don't know how to answer that

if(!string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(_signature))
{
    MessageBox.Show("This is my signature: " + Environment.NewLine + _signature);
}
else
{
    MessageBox.Show("404-Signature not found");
}

OriginalGriff wrote:

I can see why you need var - you can't use Linq properly without it

Sander Rossel wrote:

Just use an anonymous type a tuple, get the fields you want, use them in just that one function, and be done with it.

Sander Rossel wrote:

Creating a class just to be used in a single function is kind of overkill and clutters your code base.

Sander Rossel wrote:

Your front-end makes it JavaScript so it loses its type anyway.

Sander Rossel wrote:

You may not need them per se, but it makes your code cleaner and easier to read.

Jörgen Andersson wrote:

It could be argued that mixing dataaccess into your functions also clutters the code.

Jörgen Andersson wrote:

Note that anonymous classes are still typed, you just don't know what type. I just prefer to know!

return Json(new { Name = name, Valid = valid });

Jörgen Andersson wrote:

That's an opinion fact.

Sander Rossel wrote:

I've always came to regret it when I needed to change the code a week later.