|
Steve Naidamast wrote: However, ORMs tend to be on the "heavy" side in terms of tiers, making them somewhat inefficient. I'd gladly sacrifice some milliseconds for the days I save in development
Steve Naidamast wrote: using any ORM forces one to learn the idiosyncrasies of that ORM as well as the interface language. In EF's case, that would be LINQ, though you can also use EF-SQL. The result is that you become fluent in a single ORM instead of the more general language of standard SQL. I don't think you can be fluent in LINQ-to-Entities without being fluent in "bare" SQL as well.
Not being fluent in LINQ creates horrible SQL, which makes it a horrible LINQ query (no matter how "well" your LINQ query is written)
Learning how .NET translates LINQ to SQL took some time, but I thought I managed pretty well.
Until I found out EF Core doesn't support set operators that is
I know what you mean though, and it's a shame that many developers are writing LINQ without knowing SQL.
I do keep my entities in its own data layer and only return "real" POCO's to my other layers though.
In theory, I could create a project, implement some interfaces, write a bunch of ADO.NET, and replace my entire EF with ADO.NET in a single project.
So you and I more or less do the same, but a little different
|
|
|
|
|
Okay, so do you know why some people call it the BLEEDING EDGE?
|
|
|
|
|
I do now
|
|
|
|
|
EF supports stored procedures; that's what they're for.
"(I) am amazed to see myself here rather than there ... now rather than then".
― Blaise Pascal
|
|
|
|
|
Not bad, huh? Easy to remember
|
|
|
|
|
Too late
|
|
|
|
|
What do you mean? Someone beat me to it?
|
|
|
|
|
No, I meant too late for april's fool jokes
|
|
|
|
|
Ah.
|
|
|
|
|
privacy-first consumer
There's an oxymoron for you.
|
|
|
|
|
Well, I think choice is good. So far it was just the Google DNS, now here's one more.
|
|
|
|
|
Nish Nishant wrote: So far it was just the Google DNS, now here's one more.
There is also Quad9[^] 9.9.9.9 which is a joint IBM,PCH and GCA project.
Best Wishes,
-David Delaune
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ah, the Insider. Well, not everyone can afford that upscale snobbish newsletter. Some of us middle class folk only have the Lounge.
|
|
|
|
|
Well, at least you're not Soapbox rabble
|
|
|
|
|
|
I really can't wait for it to be sunny for more than 2 days straight.
My wife loves it here, otherwise, I would have moved a long time ago. Can't stand the snow.
|
|
|
|
|
be thankful you're not in UK
2 straight days of sun is a very rare and special occasion, (or for some: an omen of peril from the gods.)
Signature ready for installation. Please Reboot now.
|
|
|
|
|
You've obviously never been to the UK.
|
|
|
|
|
wrong
Signature ready for installation. Please Reboot now.
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: 2 straight days of sun is a very rare and special occasion Only someone who's never been here would make such a comment.
|
|
|
|
|
Oh sorry, I forgot the joke icon,
only because it was so bleeding obvious.
and yes I've been there a few times (and no, not just London). Even lived in Holland for a few years back in the late 80's and during that period went more times to UK (visiting a mate) than Amsterdam. Also visits since.
Richard MacCutchan wrote: Only someone who's never been here would make such a comment.
Regardless only a complete idiot to miss that my post was a joke (did you see the follow on comment about omens ... duhhh, well done Rich!)
Signature ready for installation. Please Reboot now.
|
|
|
|
|
Lopatir wrote: duhhh Sorry, I guess I pulled your chain too hard.
|
|
|
|
|
Well in London, there is most of the year darkness
And any 2 straight days of sun is surrounded by darkness before and after so our memories are simply full of darkness.
Lizard
|
|
|
|