|
It's hardly the first or only application or website to use it. I would imagine it's presumed to have benefits in preventing auto/bot sign-ins (if you consider that to be a good thing). Anyway, first world problem, don't you think? Outrage, a bit over the top?
I am not a number. I am a ... no, wait!
|
|
|
|
|
I don't think you've seen the UI. The UI has a user box and a password box. You can even enter a password there. Just that the UI behavior is based off a focus-lost trigger on the user box, which refreshes the UI - actually closes it and opens another dialog.
|
|
|
|
|
The boss asked my to look at using Skype for remote desktop. I've never used Skype before at all. I was annoyed that they seem to insist that I use my MS account to login to Windows...which I refuse to do. So, I haven't gotten anywhere with that task. 
Also, she wants to look at porting over a toll free number to a Skype account...anybody done this?
"Go forth into the source" - Neal Morse
|
|
|
|
|
Here we go again:
I lit up bacon - crazy revelation (11)
|
|
|
|
|
Publication
Anagram of I lit up bacon
We can’t stop here, this is bat country - Hunter S Thompson RIP
|
|
|
|
|
Yes indeed.
Maybe too easy this time...
|
|
|
|
|
You really don't want to do it again tomorrow, do you?
A nice simple one for a change!
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
At the risk of this seeming like a ploy to get attention, I'd like to express my satisfaction with this thread on the C# language forum (which I started): [^].
For me, this thread has the "best of CodeProject" going on: in-depth discussions, friendly challenge, helpful clarifications, fascinating speculative hypotheses.
Even (strange) a quick appearance of Luc Patyn in his cosmic form. Outstanding code contributions from Richard Deeming and Sascha LeFevre.
Of course, if I were smarter, I wouldn't mention this ... since it exposes the depth of my lack of depth; but, surely, that's why I am an ex-MVP (?) 
cheers, Bill
«Tell me and I forget. Teach me and I remember. Involve me and I learn.» Benjamin Franklin
|
|
|
|
|
Fascinating stuff...great discussion and learning opportunity! 
"Go forth into the source" - Neal Morse
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charles de Gaulle looks like Officer Crabtree.
|
|
|
|
|
That's because Officer Crabtree looks like Charles de Gaulle.
|
|
|
|
|
The earth has been in existence for 3.54 billion years*. All of us were lucky to spend a short period of that time while Bowie was alive.
*Unless you are religious, then that time is smaller
Yes I'm trying to help make Bowie the new Leslie, afterall I was instrumental in the original Leslie
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, but were you instrumental in the destruction of Pompeii 1 and 2?
|
|
|
|
|
yes[^] I just forgot my password
|
|
|
|
|
PompeyThree wrote: Unless you are religious, then that time is smaller
Ok, I'll bite.... How does someone being religious change the age of earth?
If it's not broken, fix it until it is
|
|
|
|
|
Kevin Marois wrote: How does someone being religious change the age of earth?
Science versus the Bible? I don't know. I'm just guessing that is what he meant.
|
|
|
|
|
Creationists believe the earth is around 6000 years old and that humans and dinosaurs walked the earth at the same time. Science tells us the earth is around 4.5 billions years old and that humans and dinosaurs are separated by around 65 million years.
"There are two ways of constructing a software design: One way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies, and the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies. The first method is far more difficult." - C.A.R. Hoare
Home | LinkedIn | Google+ | Twitter
|
|
|
|
|
Dominic Burford wrote: Creationists
Not religious people.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
RyanDev wrote: Not all religious people.
FTFY.
Creationists tend to base their beliefs on a literal interpretation of the old testament, and would most likely self-identify as Christians.
In other words: most creationists are religious people; but not all religious people are creationists.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Richard Deeming wrote: In other words: most creationists are religious people; but not all religious people are creationists.
Precisely. In fact, a very small percentage of religious people are creationists.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
Creationism is a literal interpretation of the bible, and so is therefore rooted in religion.
"There are two ways of constructing a software design: One way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies, and the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies. The first method is far more difficult." - C.A.R. Hoare
Home | LinkedIn | Google+ | Twitter
|
|
|
|
|
Dominic Burford wrote: Creationism is a literal interpretation of the bible, and so is therefore rooted in religion.
Correct. My point was that creationists believe in a literal time frame, not all religious people as the OP suggested. Creationists make up a small percentage of religious people.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
What!? David Bowie died? 
/ravi
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
