|
That's a good point, but I wasn't thinking about people who don't have a job.
I was thinking more along the lines of someone who really isn't working on anything they themselves consider important but still have the ability to do so.
|
|
|
|
|
Aah, yes... Now I get it. Yes, that is very painful. To that I'll add that: Doing work that I know is pointless also causes extreme unhappiness.
"Program testing can be used to show the presence of bugs, but never to show their absence."
<< please vote!! >></div>
|
|
|
|
|
R. Erasmus wrote: Doing work that I know is pointless also causes extreme unhappiness.
|
|
|
|
|
This idea is false. I'm retired, not working on a damn thing, and am very happy.
OTOH, I think I was happiest when I had my sci-tech advisor job in Iraq, because I was able to do it well, and considered that it might save a soldier, which I believed to be very worthwhile, so yeah, if you must work, then yeah, the premise is true.
|
|
|
|
|
I don't know? I think Wally is very happy and he is doing nothing important actually nothing at all. He is very good at doing nothing at all.
Dilbert linkage of course. Clickity[^]
To err is human to really mess up you need a computer
|
|
|
|
|
Wally is a great hero to many. 
|
|
|
|
|
I find that when I'm feeling unhappy, it's virtually always because I'm not living up to my own standards and responsibilities.
Cheers,
Mike Fidler
"I intend to live forever - so far, so good." Steven Wright
"I almost had a psychic girlfriend but she left me before we met." Also Steven Wright
"I'm addicted to placebos. I could quit, but it wouldn't matter." Steven Wright yet again.
|
|
|
|
|
Were this actually true, weekends and vacations would suck....
|
|
|
|
|
Isn't it interesting how everyone interprets the word "work"?
Fred: What are you _working_ on?
Sam: I'm overhauling my '73 Mustang.
Fred: Is anyone paying you?
Sam: No.
Fred: Sounds like you're playing around to me.
Sam: Hmmm....
|
|
|
|
|
Hi All,
Currently I am in the process of using VS 2005 for a project with no problems. But as an aside I thought I would try a later version of VS to see if it can be upgraded with out problems. So I go to download VS latest express, and find 2015 Community edition. Not an Express doesn't appear to be limited. Is this really what I think it is (full & free)? I take it M$ are spying on you some how?  Or are they giving the Keys to Kingdom away (I feel the need to listen to the Spin Doctors!)
|
|
|
|
|
Pretty much yes - it's the full version, and it's free.
There are terms and conditions though - mostly related to the size of your company - and you should read them carefully: MICROSOFT VISUAL STUDIO COMMUNITY 2015[^] though there is a syummary at the bottom of here: Free Dev Tools - Visual Studio Community 2015[^]
Be aware that if you upgrade a project to VS2015, you won't be able to open it again in VS2005. I would recommend good, solid backups before I started experimentation. If you are using VS2005 on original period hardware, you may find 2015 far, far too sluggish to use...
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: If you are using VS2005 on original period hardware, you may find 2015 far, far too sluggish to use...
You may find that regardless of system and hardware... 
|
|
|
|
|
I haven't migrated to 2015 yet - I only moved to 2013 last year - and I have found that my new SSD makes it really usable! Load time is about 6 or 7 seconds from click to "ready to code" instead of a couple of minutes, and compilation seems faster as well. I suspect that MS developers all have nice fat pipes, and nice big SSD's...and don't give a rat's ass about anyone else. 
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
My biggest issue going from 10 to 15 on my work laptop is that 10 was small enough I could normally run 2 instances and have enough headroom for the rest of my software and mandatory corporate bloat in 8gb of ram. 15's big enough that having 2 copies running will generally start swap chugging when I switch to whatever major application I used least recently. On days when the bloatware is feeling particularly hungry (I've occasionally seen both MsMpEng and the servicehost running updates bloat to >1gb each at the same time and squat there for hours) I've had it happen with only one instance of 15 running.
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, waging all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
Bearing in mind, the opening time, the fact that I am pretty much used to the 2005/08 interface and the speed I will not upgrade the project. It's just a relay card that I was looking at using came with an example using Vis C# 2010 so I thought to upgrade itand just use it for reference.
|
|
|
|
|
The interface is pretty much the same (in the case of 2013, once you get rid of the Goth look, and the SHOUTY menu). But the later versions of C# and .NET do include some pretty useful stuff, that wasn't in 2005.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: once you get rid of the Goth look
How?
If it's not broken, fix it until it is
|
|
|
|
|
Tools...Options
Environment, General, Visual experience:Color Theme (Light or Blue)
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Oh OK. I'm using this theme[^]. I thought you meant you knew of a way to change that silly flat look.
If it's not broken, fix it until it is
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: Color Theme (Light or Blue)
Or "Dark" Don't forget the dark side  My tired old eyes like the dark option.
Get me coffee and no one gets hurt!
|
|
|
|
|
I think of that as the "depressed Goth" look... 
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, Community Edition are feature-rich compared to Express Edition. It's free (You just need to activate using your email.)with few terms: for example, free for individual developer, small organization (revenue less than 1 million USD) etc. Free Dev Tools - Visual Studio Community 2015[^]
I have been using VS2013 community edition and its good compared to previous express editions and working out great.
Happy coding.
Thanks,
Milind
|
|
|
|
|
Yes. I have been using the 2015 Community Edition for a while now, and can recommend it. It is the full McCoy, not limited like the Express versions were. It takes longer to load a project than my 2012 Pro version, but not to the extent that it bothers me. My advice: Go for it, but as suggested above: Backup projects in case you want to go back to 2005.
I do not know why it's free, but I appreciate the fact that Microsoft is not charging for it.
Get me coffee and no one gets hurt!
|
|
|
|
|
The tl;dr version:
Community edition is virtually the same as Professional edition minus support for TFS and limited to five users per company
|
|
|
|
|
It just that it seems odd, VS is / was one of there key products. 
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
