|
yes, I like to look at windows form designer architecture and figure out how to write my own..
diligent hands rule....
|
|
|
|
|
Little hint, for further reading: There are also some good articles about SharpDevelop here on CodeProject, which cover its Core and Add-In System as well as the AvalonEdit text editor. Simply search for "SharpDevelop". Just in case you didn't know yet. 
|
|
|
|
|
thank you!
I mainly want to look at windows form designer chapter and play around with it.
any new info to share?
diligent hands rule....
|
|
|
|
|
Well, I think the source code published with the book might be too outdated, I can't even remember if they had a complete and working implementation of a Form Designer back then (which was around v1.0?). You could go and check out the current source code on GitHub, the Forms Designer is implemented as an AddIn (in the folder src/AddIns/DisplayBinding/FormsDesigner) and it should be pretty solid already since most of the effort in recent years was in the XAML/WPF area.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The official repository is on Github[^]
but if all you want is a forms designer then this article[^] may be what you need.
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???
|
|
|
|
|
thank you very much! your input is very helpful.
diligent hands rule....
|
|
|
|
|
|
Karel Čapek wrote: Such clever little primates.
I think it's a race to see if we can get a self-sustainable colony somewhere before we kill this planet.
Clever indeed. 
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
You've been reading the drivel we post in Soap Box 1.0! 
|
|
|
|
|
I've been reading about new(ish) / less used languages a bit lately and the two that I've come across often are Go and Rust. There's lost of information about strengths and weaknesses, similarities and differences of each, but I haven't been able to find any discussions about them here on CodeProject so I'd appreciate opinions (if any) about them from you people. Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
Go seems to me like a variant of C with some extra "stuff that doesn't interest me that much". Also the hype seems to have mostly cooled down.
Rust has some cool tricks, interesting type system, I'm not really sure about the faint "functional smell" though.
|
|
|
|
|
More or less my impressions too. They probably appeal to me because they are both compiled languages.
|
|
|
|
|
Go is as usefull and interesting as Esperanto.
Bastard Programmer from Hell 
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Kial vi diras tion? 
|
|
|
|
|
Can't answer, the question is written in a deprecated langauge.
--
Many more programming-labnguages have been invented and forgotten. Go got traction because it is pushed by Google and because some academics jumped on the wagon, but "that's it".
Microsoft knows how to push those things - there's tons of documentation on .NET, with out of the box bindings to WinForms and very easy database-access.
Languages come and Go, only the usefull remain.
Bastard Programmer from Hell
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Eddy Vluggen wrote: Languages come and Go
And then there are those that corrode.
|
|
|
|
|
Close your eyes, and it wil go away.
The world needs a new hype every day, it seems. Most of it is just noise, some are nicely tried and lack, some are utterly cool and usefull and still fail.
There once existed a multitasking windowed operating-system that ran largely from memory. It supported too many colors to be taken serious as a computer for the office.
Bastard Programmer from Hell
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Eddy Vluggen wrote: Close your eyes, and it wil go away.
True. My previous post was a sorry attempt at a pun on Rust, that's all. 
|
|
|
|
|
Sound like some of my old cars I've had 
|
|
|
|
|
Otto Grunf wrote: so I'd appreciate opinions (if any) about them from you people.
There are hundreds and perhaps thousands of 'new' technologies 'invented' every year which actually reach some level of public exposure.
If you are just interested then just keep looking another will be along shortly.
If you are attempting find something that is actually going to be useful then wait until more people actually use it and there is evidence that they are continuing to use it.
For languages entertain yourself with the following.
http://www.tiobe.com/index.php/content/paperinfo/tpci/index.html[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Go: apparently some good multithreading features
Rust: seems way to immature
What I'm particularly interested in is Dart[^] for replacing Javacrap.
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you all for the comments! It's just that I'm a bit tired of CLR/JVM/scripting/functional languages and I'm itching to try a nice compiled one.
|
|
|
|
|
Short analysis:
CLR is compiled unless you play with Dynamic etc and even then, compiled...
JVM => I DO NOT CARE TO BOTHER MY SELF .
SCRIPTING => well, some scripting languages could be compiled or live in both worlds
FUNCTIONAL => FUNCTIONAL CAN BE COMPILED! Is just language feature...
Please, update your comments .
Well in general, if you have itching, you should scratch it a little .
|
|
|
|
|
Good to know the details, thanks. I guess I should've phrased my comment something like this:
"I would like to learn a compiled language that doesn't run on the .Net platform. It should not run on the JVM either. It should be able to produce standalone executable files unlike the Python and Ruby scripting languages that I like and sometime use. It should be an imperative language (with OO features preferably, but not required). The language's name should not be C or C++. VB6 here I come! I don't actually itch. [1]"
[1] Although I may start if I actually get close to a machine with a VB6 compiler on it.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
