|
What a fine knackering of that twisted egomaniac ... I think of Brand as England's answer to Howard Stern.
«OOP to me means only messaging, local retention and protection and hiding of state-process, and extreme late-binding of all things. » Alan Kay's clarification on what he meant by the term "Object" in "Object-Oriented Programming."
|
|
|
|
|
Brandy is a complete twat.
|
|
|
|
|
Who the hell is Brand? Oh right a UK thing, a shock jock maybe. The breed is globally annoying.
I hope squander two is not in IT and did not build/design that page. He does write well though.
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
If he were a woman, I'd be in love.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
|
It never fails to amaze me just what the Mail will get offended over.
|
|
|
|
|
It appears the Wail Online only puts up crap that's calculated to get a reaction. What does amaze me is that it is so popular, probably something to do with appealing to the lowest common denominator IQ.
|
|
|
|
|
Nagy Vilmos wrote: probably something to do with appealing to the lowest common denominator IQ.
What amazes me more is the people who read it, some of them ARE intelligent. I suppose a paper is a habit thing. It's takes awhile to get use to another paper. You miss certain coloumnists etc.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, some is too rough while other is too thin...
Geek code v 3.12
GCS d--- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L- E-- W++ N++ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t++ 5? X R++ tv-- b+ DI+++ D++ G e++>+++ h--- r++>+++ y+++*
Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
|
|
|
|
|
I used to always read the Enid Stannit and I never really noticed how it slid down hill. Now that I only see it occasionally, it is visibly kack.
I wonder if it's related to the Wail? :innocent:
|
|
|
|
|
They made me chuckle nice to see some companies aren't taking Christmas too seriously
Every day, thousands of innocent plants are killed by vegetarians.
Help end the violence EAT BACON
|
|
|
|
|
Neither?
Some men are born mediocre, some men achieve mediocrity, and some men have mediocrity thrust upon them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
People are offended way too easily. I don't think most of those cards should be within a child's grasp. As a Christian I'm not offended by the messages. I won't be buying them though.
modified 17-Dec-14 8:11am.
|
|
|
|
|
Offensively funny?
Funnily offensive?
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
---
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
|
|
|
|
|
The comments at the bottom of such articles never fail to make me laugh 
"There are two ways of constructing a software design: One way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies, and the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies. The first method is far more difficult." - C.A.R. Hoare
Home | LinkedIn | Google+ | Twitter
|
|
|
|
|
Some over-paid hack wrote:
The Proctors have a £1.5million thatched home in Dorset and a luxury central London address for the weekdays they spend working.
They have three grown-up children, enjoy a succession of exotic holidays and ferry themselves around by Porsche, Jeep, and even a powerboat.
What?! How dare these people get rich through hard work! Don't they know that only benefit-cheating immigants[^] are supposed to get rich, so that lazy journalists have something to complain about? 
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
"in full view of children"
Yea like they've never seen those particular combinations of letters before. Also, that's all they are: particular combinations of letters.
|
|
|
|
|
F*** off c***
PooperPig - Coming Soon
|
|
|
|
|
For me it Santa L Jackson! 
|
|
|
|
|
Being offensive, vulgar and anti-intellectual is in fashion these days.
I'd rather be phishing!
|
|
|
|
|
I fail to see how any of these are anti-intellectual?
|
|
|
|
|
For elephanting elephants' sake! "Holy sh*t" is now obscene? Child porn is obscene. Colourful language is just that. Colourful.
No object is so beautiful that, under certain conditions, it will not look ugly. - Oscar Wilde
|
|
|
|
|
Brady Kelly wrote: Colourful language is just that. Colourful.
It is surely true that many people find certain words offensive
These include sh*t f*** c*** a***hole and others.
whether or not you agree with that is certainly your choice.
But surely it is only the polite thing to do to respect other peoples sensibilities?
Or do you swear in front of children and is it OK if they swear too?
What if they tell their teacher they didn't do their homework because they were "f***ed"? should the teacher just chastise them for not doign homework but for using inappropriate language?
PooperPig - Coming Soon
|
|
|
|
|
_Maxxx_ wrote: It is surely true that many people find certain words offensive
Then they have every right to not buy those cards, or if it is so bad, they are even free to not frequent or buy anything from shops that display them.
_Maxxx_ wrote: Or do you swear in front of children and is it OK if they swear too?
You do have a good point here. There is indeed some risk that very young children may see these words in the same light-hearted context their parents do, and assume they can use them anywhere as a joke as well.
No object is so beautiful that, under certain conditions, it will not look ugly. - Oscar Wilde
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
