|
Very interesting.
I don't care.
Facebook is hardly an indispensable resource. The can move en masse within days to one of the hundreds of other "social networking" solutions, and will obviously be better off for having done so, so they have no right to demand sympathy.
I repeat: I don't give a bugger.
They can deal with their petty little problems, and I won't bother them with mine.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Sahir Shah wrote: This was a group providing a necessary safe harbor for everyone from the LGBT community to atheists living in Pakistan, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Egypt and other countries,
That's my guess as to why they killed the group - so as not to offend the delicate sensibilities of those governments. Not being on the site, I can't confirm, but I'd bet that there are many atheist groups accessible from outside those countries.
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
Well, I think it is quite the opposite. If you don't even believe in God, then how could you mix with facebook? 
|
|
|
|
|
CPallini wrote: If you don't even believe in God, then how could you mix with facebook?
I don't. And I don't. 
However, the two massive outbreaks of disbelief are not related.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Because you don't believe in synapses too. 
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry, but Zuckerberk is not god! 
Life is like a s**t sandwich; the more bread you have, the less s**t you eat.
|
|
|
|
|
In the Giant Pimple of Weirdness on the Face of the Mutant Hell-Being Spawn of Technology Eating Culture: what would you expect to be going on ?
As to the Big Question: I never got past asking "Is there a Me ?" and never getting any answer.
«What we observe is not nature itself, but nature exposed to our method of questioning» Werner Heisenberg
|
|
|
|
|
There's an official FSM page. Maybe they haven't worked out that it's a spoof religion?!!!
Life is like a s**t sandwich; the more bread you have, the less s**t you eat.
|
|
|
|
|
Reading through the previous replies gets me to wondering if this was not a result of a CAIR campaign.
cat fud heer
|
|
|
|
|
It is a 'What have you tried?' morning...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
And don't forget to post only relevant parts of your code. No code dumps! 
The language is JavaScript. that of Mordor, which I will not utter here
This is Javascript. If you put big wheels and a racing stripe on a golf cart, it's still a f***ing golf cart.
"I don't know, extraterrestrial?"
"You mean like from space?"
"No, from Canada."
|
|
|
|
|
Hello All, I am in need of help with a business inventory tracking database. I have already designed the data tables etc. I just need some way to attach to it. Preferably without using a webpage. Does anyone have any thoughts here? What would use to connect? It seems like it should be fairly simple.
|
|
|
|
|
First, you need to connect your own mind to the pinned post at the top of this Forum whose title is:
"Posting rules for The Lounge [modified] Pin"
Second, when you understand what this Forum is for, and what it is not for, then remove this inappropriate message, and post a question on one of CP's QA forums, or one of the other forums, like the ASP.NET forum, or the database forum.
You may wish to search CodeProject before you post your question, since there are many great tutorials here on databases, ASP.NET, many useful tip/tricks, etc.
I am sure you will find people here glad to assist you.
«A man will be imprisoned in a room with a door that's unlocked and opens inwards ... as long as it does not occur to him to pull rather than push» Wittgenstein
|
|
|
|
|
It may be very close to the hardware, but I have been using a bidirectional data bus[^] for such problems for many years now.
The language is JavaScript. that of Mordor, which I will not utter here
This is Javascript. If you put big wheels and a racing stripe on a golf cart, it's still a f***ing golf cart.
"I don't know, extraterrestrial?"
"You mean like from space?"
"No, from Canada."
|
|
|
|
|
HI ALL,
I reading a book "C++ in Action". it mentions that we(human) only have two methods: divide and conquer, abstraction. Do you agree?
diligent hands rule....
|
|
|
|
|
Southmountain wrote: divide and conquer
Julio Cesar would agree with you
Southmountain wrote: abstraction
Salvador Dali would agree with you too
I'll get my coat
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The way a cat handles a mouse.
«A man will be imprisoned in a room with a door that's unlocked and opens inwards ... as long as it does not occur to him to pull rather than push» Wittgenstein
|
|
|
|
|
No.
If it's wrong about that, it will be wrong about other things, so don't bother to read the rest.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
No.
Do not read programming books that mix too much personal philosophy with the subject!
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
Divide and Conquer, and Abstraction are the same concept.
If we are looking at something too complex to immediately understand as a single whole, we understand a subsection of the whole, by ignoring the remainder.
Divide and conquer is ignoring the horizontal breadth of the system, and understanding a small vertical section from top to bottom.
Abstraction is understanding the horizontal breadth of the system, but not from top to bottom.
I would argue there is an additional way of understanding a complex system. Formally. Balls crashing around a pool table may initially look too complex to understand, but by applying a few simple Newtonian formulas to some of the basic properties of the system, it's complexity can be revealed to be quite simple. (Until someone starts hitting balls close to the speeds of light)
|
|
|
|
|
In practice, complexity is usually handled by not handling it and just letting the next guy deal.
|
|
|
|
|
No, unfortunately there is also a third, very large fraction of people, known as the Forces Of Chaos. They don't divide, conquer or abstract anything. Instead they prefer to produce endless unstructured spaghetti code, no matter how unmaintainable this mess becomes.
The language is JavaScript. that of Mordor, which I will not utter here
This is Javascript. If you put big wheels and a racing stripe on a golf cart, it's still a f***ing golf cart.
"I don't know, extraterrestrial?"
"You mean like from space?"
"No, from Canada."
|
|
|
|
|
CDP1802 wrote: they prefer to produce endless unstructured spaghetti code
I once saw one of those in the mirror years ago, but I think he's dead now because I don't see him anymore.
«What we observe is not nature itself, but nature exposed to our method of questioning» Werner Heisenberg
|
|
|
|
|
No.
Depends on the level of the complexity, and the "processing power" of the brain(s) involved.
What seems to one person as "impossibly complex" is frequently fully grasped by a cleverer, or more experienced person.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
