|
Hi, I usually reads a lot of documents specifying up time on applications but this was a new on for me. In an ongoing project they have specified that the application, when finished, should have at least 99.95% down time.
Makes me question why they are doing the project... 
|
|
|
|
|
Come on then, how will you guarantee no more 43 seconds runtime per day AND ensure all the other functionality is available?
speramus in juniperus
|
|
|
|
|
|
But it needs to be functionally complete...
speramus in juniperus
|
|
|
|
|
Language in the lounge! 
|
|
|
|
|
Man! You are going to have to work hard on that...have you considered a splash screen that takes 23 hours, 59 minutes and 16 seconds to finish loading, then close your app down 44 seconds later?
But hard on the users though...they better learn to type real fast.
|
|
|
|
|
Could it be Task application? just synchronizing stuff for 44 secs every day?
if(this.signature != "")
{
MessageBox.Show("This is my signature: " + Environment.NewLine + signature);
}
else
{
MessageBox.Show("404-Signature not found");
}
|
|
|
|
|
Oh, that project already made. they called it Vista...
I'm not questioning your powers of observation; I'm merely remarking upon the paradox of asking a masked man who he is (V).
|
|
|
|
|
Kornfeld Eliyahu Peter wrote: Oh, that project already made. they called it Vista...
know, it was called healthcare.gov
|
|
|
|
|
My Campervan is a 1976 VW Type 2 Super Viking
|
|
|
|
|
Marcus_2 wrote:
Hi, I usually reads a lot of documents specifying
up time on applications but this was a new on for me. In an ongoing project they
have specified that the application, when finished, should have at least 99.95%
down time. Makes me question why they are doing the project...
This requirement is common in financial industry, service web sites, etc. But you don't usually agree on software but on service (SLA). 99.95% availability means you can be down 1.5 days per year. That's a lot of hours. Imagine Facebook doing that ( or Apollo 11  ). If your company took the assignment it means they are either pretty sure of their capabilities or ... 
|
|
|
|
|
99.95% availability does, yes.
He is talking about 99.95% down time!
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: He is talking about 99.95% down time!
Got me there.  Lawyers.
|
|
|
|
|
Tomaž Štih wrote: Lawyers.
Mind your language sir! A chap could take offence at being called one of those...
|
|
|
|
|
Sheep *lover*? Is that okay?
speramus in juniperus
|
|
|
|
|
Better than "lawyer" *ack!* *spit!*
|
|
|
|
|
Are you guys building a woman? 
|
|
|
|
|
That was funny 
Cheers,
विक्रम
"We have already been through this, I am not going to repeat myself." - fat_boy, in a global warming thread
|
|
|
|
|
I'm just watching a documentary about the vikings, narrated by Neil Oliver, who's Scottish accent sounds me like acting and makes me hard to follow the movie...
I'm not questioning your powers of observation; I'm merely remarking upon the paradox of asking a masked man who he is (V).
|
|
|
|
|
There is only one Viking Documentary[^]; full of fun facts.
Spot the stained-glass is a fun one - used in various places despite the fact it was not developed to that extent for several centuries.
speramus in juniperus
|
|
|
|
|
|
I found Viking to be very expensive.
My company is much cheaper.
---------------------------------
Obscurum per obscurius.
Ad astra per alas porci.
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur .
|
|
|
|
|
|
Why, oh why, oh... spells Yoyo.
[esc]dda
Why did I know what the link was going to be before I clickitied?
speramus in juniperus
|
|
|
|
|
No, I did not mention the name of the company nor provide a link.
I merely made a statement of fact.
Statement's of fact must not be censored, that is what happens in communofascist states such as er... Britain.
---------------------------------
Obscurum per obscurius.
Ad astra per alas porci.
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur .
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
