|
Nagy Vilmos wrote: I can't sit up all night talking crap while getting drunk any more.
I think you still can very much do it. It was just that you knew what you were doing back then. 
"Real men drive manual transmission" - Rajesh.
|
|
|
|
|
Mike Hankey wrote: but ] learned
Who is 'Close Bracket'? Is that your real name?  
Keep Clam And Proofread
--
√(-1) 23 ∑ π...
And it was delicious.
|
|
|
|
|
Brisingr Aerowing wrote:
Who is 'Close Bracket'? Is that your real name?
My keyboard is starting to stick badly and I'm to cheap to buy a new one!
|
|
|
|
|
I popped the caps off two keyboards the other day and washed them and the chassis.
I couldn't recognize half the...stuff...that was stuck under the keys. Shudder.
|
|
|
|
|
Holy Oak, Batman! She must have made a new weapon!
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Welcome to the club. I spent a month of weekends this summer working in the yard. Two weekends I came in contact with poison oak, and the third poison ivy. Each cleared up just in time for the next weekend's exposure  .
Software Zen: delete this;
|
|
|
|
|
I got all of it the first shot so I won't have to go in in full battle dress for the rest of the yard.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm considering buying one of these devices, and the normal Kindle E-Ink version costs Rs. 5999 (USD 100) and the Kindle Paperwhite version costs Rs. 10999 (USD 179).
With the screen size and everything else remaining the same except for the display technology, I'm just wondering if the Paperwhite version is worth the extra USD 79, or should I just get the basic version?
Thanks!
"Real men drive manual transmission" - Rajesh.
|
|
|
|
|
If you plan reading in the dark, get the paperwhite version; if not, get the regular flavor.
I'd rather be phishing!
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you, that helps.
"Real men drive manual transmission" - Rajesh.
|
|
|
|
|
The display looks nicer on the Paperwhite too. That said, I'm more than happy with my Kindle Touch.
|
|
|
|
|
The new kindle paper white comes with two versions $119 (No 3G) and $179 for 3G , Both has no color display.
But I would go with - All-New Kindle Fire 7" Tablet HD , It's 139$ and color  display.
Thanks,
Ranjan.D
|
|
|
|
|
That makes two of us. I won't allow amazon to sell me an android tablet in the name of "kindle with colour display".
Plus, I want a proper e-book reader that won't strain my eyes.
"Real men drive manual transmission" - Rajesh.
|
|
|
|
|
I've had a couple, and really love my new paperwhite with 3g. It's impressively crisp. The "Fire"s are just android tablets.
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you, but if the ability to read in the dark is the only difference, then I think I'd save the $$ and get the basic version instead.
Yeah, I wasn't looking for those fire type thingies anyways as they're not true e-book readers.
"Real men drive manual transmission" - Rajesh.
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah I'm not sure whether there's sufficient difference in the quality of the two monochrome displays to be worth a price difference.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm sure there are lighting conditions where a Kindle might be able to provide a better reading experience, but I simply use a pad and run the Kindle app. These days I twitch at the thought of buying hardware that can do one and only one thing.
As an aside, a year or so ago I owned an e-ink Kindle for all of 24 hours. Each time you change the page, the screen flashes solid black and then displays the new page. I'm told that's just the way the technology works. Holy crap, if I developed software that did that, I'd never hear the end of it.
But then, Bezos is rich and I don't have a private jet just yet, so what do I know?
|
|
|
|
|
I originally had a Kindle keyboard, and I ended up with the paperwhite because lenghty explanation that really doesn't matter for your question.
Display-wise, I prefer the truly passive over the paperwhite.
Even when I was tired of looking at a monitor, the passive Kindle was ok. Paperwhite is somewhere inbetween - much less "intense" than a monitor, but not as "easy on the eyes" either.
Reading in the dark, backlit, loses exactly that aspect for me, so I strongly prefer still having a night lamp.
The backlight can't be turned off completely, it is somewhat uneven it (acording to the reviews, this was way way worse for the first batches).
Primary: If you are like me and there's a big difference between reading on a "normal" tablet and reading on a passive display, skip the paperwhite. Consider a clip-on light instead. (the keyboard generation had clip on lights powered by the internal battery, not sure if they still exist for the Touch).
Otherwise, pick a paperwhite if any of the following reasons click with you:
- you have no better idea how to spend the extra money
- you plan on reading during your daily commute, which goes through a dark-ish tunnel
- reading under the sheets is important
- you plan on saving money by charging your kindle at work, and turning the lights off when reading at home
Otherwise, go with the touch.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks very much, I've dropped the paperwhite out of my equation now.
"Real men drive manual transmission" - Rajesh.
|
|
|
|
|
I have such a strong dislike for anything Amazon or iTunes I have never considered a kindle and use a Note 1 for reading, have done for years.
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
I thought you'd written "Kindle vs Kindle Paperweight" and thought "That's a bit harsh - surely they aren't that bad..."
Need sleep.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Get some rest.
"Real men drive manual transmission" - Rajesh.
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: Kindle Paperweight
When it came out, I also read the same on 'The Verge' article, I thought they were trying to make fun of the old kindle lineup.
|
|
|
|
|
I have a kindle keyboard version and decided not to upgrade to a backlit screen as the point of the kindle is to be close to reading a book, the e-ink is very close to reading a book, and a book is not backlit.
A bedside lamp works perfectly and have found the basic kindle to be great for reading.
Bear in mind that the backlight is going to shorten battery life too - I have had no need for a backlight on my 3 year old kindle.
“That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.”
― Christopher Hitchens
|
|
|
|
|
I liked the author's introduction about himself:
My unit tests don't always come first...and sometimes they don’t even exist. I make off-by-one errors every so often. The type inference section of the C# specification still confuses me, and there are some uses of Java wildcards that make me want to have a little lie-down. I’m a deeply flawed programmer.
That’s the way it should be. For the next few hundred pages, I’ll try to pretend otherwise: I’ll espouse best practices as if I always followed them myself, and frown on dirty shortcuts as if I’d never dream of taking them. Don’t believe a word of it. The truth of the matter is, I’m probably just like you. I happen to know a bit more about how C# works, that’s all...and even that state of affairs will only last until you've finished the book.
Although I'd go to bed in a few minutes, I think I'll pick up this book tomorrow, and I'll definitely enjoy reading it.
"Real men drive manual transmission" - Rajesh.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
