|
3 stefans is alot though. 3 Stevens sure. But not 3 stefans
To err is human to really elephant it up you need a computer
|
|
|
|
|
It’s about 1.13 stevens per Stefan.
But what is the Stephen to Steven ratio?
If you can't laugh at yourself - ask me and I will do it for you.
|
|
|
|
|
the Stephen to Steven ratio is irational and the Steve to Stephen ratio is .57721
To err is human to really elephant it up you need a computer
|
|
|
|
|
I've worked with people who brought negative productivity.
Two of them would be worse than one.
So should we say one Rick is equal to minus two Johns?
|
|
|
|
|
I envy you. I have visual voice mail on my mobile phone with T-Mobile, and when I try to look at it I keep getting stupid questions about "permissions" that I need to give it to use it.
I am happy for you that yours is working.
Moist VonLipvig
|
|
|
|
|
all voice permission must be given in order to proceed in life. The googlina wants all your data and permissions.
To err is human to really elephant it up you need a computer
|
|
|
|
|
Up close popular note, my friend. (8)
(A more traditionally formed clue)
I have a meeting soon, so may not be able to answer for a couple of hours.
Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994. So does this signature. me, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
Oh, very good!
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
up close (definition)
popular in
note ti
my friend mate intimate
|
|
|
|
|
That's what I came up with
Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well-preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside in a cloud of smoke, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming “Wow! What a Ride!" - Hunter S Thompson - RIP
|
|
|
|
|
I was assuming "intimate" but couldn't justify the "popular note" bit - so easy when you know how!
|
|
|
|
|
You don't need to justify it!
|
|
|
|
|
YAUT!
Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994. So does this signature. me, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you. Mainly features, gotchas, value for money
|
|
|
|
|
Still namecheap. I haven't changed my mind in the last 60 seconds.
|
|
|
|
|
I usually just use Network Solutions, because domain names are so cheap these days it's not really worth my time to shop around.
I have however, noticed I'm getting "incidents" involving my DNS a few times a month, usually from a spazzy server in the netherlands or some such, although one time it impacted me here.
I'm not sure if that has to do with my provider or just the Internet being the Internet, and me not paying for any kind of uptime.
To err is human. Fortune favors the monsters.
|
|
|
|
|
Afternoon ladies and gents. Haven't been in the lounge in a while, and am back with a question. I'm wanting to register a domain and was wondering if GoDaddy is still the best out there?
|
|
|
|
|
GoDaddy has gone downhill in my opinion. I have found NameCheap.com to be a useful, vanilla, domain registrar. I have used them for years with no problems.
|
|
|
|
|
I use Google Domains, domains.google.com
They are cheap ($12/yr for most domains), fast, simple & you can control everything you need.
Also they don't bug you with spam email & mailers.
|
|
|
|
|
I have been using Google Domains for some time as well. Much cheaper than my previous provider https://www.123-reg.co.uk/[^].
+1 for Google Domains
|
|
|
|
|
I've used both register.com and godaddy. Not much difference between them.
"Go forth into the source" - Neal Morse
"Hope is contagious"
|
|
|
|
|
namecheap. Simple, easy to use, does what I need.
|
|
|
|
|
I also use Namecheap.com No problem with them.
|
|
|
|
|
I use Network Solutions. They are not expensive and they even called me when my registration was about to expire.
Cosmo Lavish
|
|
|
|
|