|
|
That's cheap!
It's good value at the £30 I paid - very, very nice piece of kit. Rare to find something that does what it says it does, right out of the box and with the lack of hassle and trouble it gives you.
The only thing I changed was to get a 20cm cable Ebay £1.52[^] as the original was too long and untidy.
Get LocalCast[^] - Android, but I understand there is an iOS version - and you are sorted.
You looking for sympathy?
You'll find it in the dictionary, between sympathomimetic and sympatric
(Page 1788, if it helps)
|
|
|
|
|
Awesome will get that on the go, thanks for the advice!
|
|
|
|
|
What are the basic topics expected in an approach of a new open source project ?
|
|
|
|
|
I would expect an article series not just one 
It should begin with an introduction to beginners and should also cover from basics to advanced level. Sure, I would be interested in learning the inner workings, it's architecture etc.
I always expect an article should present in a most simple, fluid manner and should be specific in explaining the topics and cover from how to use to how it's being implemented. Rather than being a single huge article, I prefer reading it in parts.
Thanks,
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Rajan,
Tks for your reply.
See the article draft :
http://pccs01-001-site1.myasp.net/press
Something like this is the least satisfactorily
understandable for us .NET developers ?
Waiting your response.
Regards
|
|
|
|
|
Here are few things you have to consider before you publish one.
1. Please remove the section above the download code at the beginning. That's optional and I hardly see those in articles.
2. Article requires code formatting.
3. I hope this is a beginners level article. Could be done better with Introduction etc. in terms of quality content.
4. You can name the Scenario within the "Using Code" section. That's the general CodeProject Guideline.
5. Could you explain the real world scenario were exactly SBWQL would be helpful. I see several hardcoded bit wise things
but I'm getting little confused how to use these things without hardcoding.
6. How about the performance compared to the existing LINQ Query.
7. Don't mistake me, I feel this approach makes the code hard to read though it might simplify things.
Thanks,
modified 23-Aug-14 10:35am.
|
|
|
|
|
Thank for your valuable feedback.
With this you come to confirm the low acceptance of the new idea,
as occurred in a previous post 'Short LINQ syntax',
where I found professionals with much less ethics which you presented.
This fact makes me believe that I am still a simple developer
who found an interesting way to solve everyday problems with little writing,
and it is still not to be disclosed to any developer community.
Thank you again and a great weekend.
I'm out now, only reading and learning every day.
Regards,
Rocha, Renato
|
|
|
|
|
Well all I said was a positive feedback and nothing much. I don't understand what makes you low or feel negative.
Being a opensource developer, if you can't explain what it is, then how can you expect others to understand ?
Thanks,
|
|
|
|
|
Exactly Richard,
Please believe,
Your feedback has been positive in some way.
I live in Brazil where things are not as
easy as in the first world countries,
work intensively with technology 15 years.
But since my start on this journey,
I was never very adept at discussions
in Forums, Communities, etc.
Being a person with little patience
to read responses that have nothing to do
with the proposed content, disputes ego, etc.
By setting this idea, in the excitement of finding that
this would be well, i'm encouraged me to publish it.
As I do not have much time to improve
content for this idea is better understood,
to be involved in my day job plus freelances
and failing to give proper attention to my family,
I end up not insist more on this idea.
I'm pulling me to meet a freelancer working this weekend.
Thank you very much.
|
|
|
|
|
I appreciate your patience. You have enough ideas and coded some innovative things for which the opensource communities always feel proud about it. I suggest you could have directly published an article and would anyways received proper feedbacks. Based upon that you can decide whether to improve and extend further.
Good luck to you.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks a lot ! 
|
|
|
|
|
In Joel's words: "the incredible amount of bombast; the heroic, utopian grandiloquence; the boastfulness; the complete lack of reality."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Richard,
Tks for your reply.
I recently submitted the article at this link.
See the article draft :
http://pccs01-001-site1.myasp.net/press
Something like this is the least satisfactorily
understandable for us .NET developers ?
Waiting your response.
Regards
|
|
|
|
|
A lot of code, but not much of an article. Like I said earlier, go and read some of the CodeProject articles to see what is expected.
|
|
|
|
|
Perfect !
Thank you very much for read and give your feedback.
Regards,
Rocha, Renato
|
|
|
|
|
Read this.[^]
A lot of it is applicable to what an article for an OS project should contain as well.
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
Good literature
Thank you !
|
|
|
|
|
If you write installers or applications that flash and twittle you must be punished.
Says one of many that has to access VM's remotely over a limited bandwidth connection.
Please turn your self in for punishment.
|
|
|
|
|
Eggbert Bartholomew Bligh wrote: If you write installers
Ah I'm safe then, internal apps using clickonce are a blessing.
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
Bandwidth is not something most of us even account for these days...isn't it unlimited, like everything else...memory, disk space? (sarcasm)  As for installers, my gripe is against those who create installers with the kitchen sink thrown in for good measure...using merge modules for third party libraries with everything selected! I have a current situation with another vendor where we use almost the same version of a popular reporting package. We went through a lot of effort to include only the libraries needed (only a dozen or so) with our installer. The other company installs the whole shebang...hundreds of dlls that they don't even utilize! The problem is that the mere presence a particular file of a particular version (naturally, the one that they install) causes reports in our software to crash intermittently...no pattern. Research shows that this rogue library gets called into memory by some (so far) unknown process. Removing the file on the client caused their installer to go into a tizzy and replace it anyway. I wrote a special installer to update the library to a reliable version. Problem solved. Our reports work OK, their reports work OK. Until...they release a software update. Apparently, their installer replaces the newer library with the old flaky version.  ...which leads to another support call, and simply replacing that file again. The bad news is that about 35% of my customers use their product. It's hard to convince a customer that your program is crashing because of an update they did to another program.
"Go forth into the source" - Neal Morse
|
|
|
|
|
My wee teenage son has only been interested in games etc, but recently school has introduced him to scratch. He has enjoyed playing with it, but when I looked at it, it appeared to be a bit simplistic.
My background .Net and I have my prejudices but I'm wondering what other peoples opinions are on a easy to learn professional language for someone interested in games and animation (now thats outside my expertise)
I'm trying to put my prejudices at door and would appreciate some balanced thoughts. Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
inb4 flamewar
RossMW wrote: easy to learn professional language
Does that even exist?
Anyway if he's serious about it and you like .NET.. maybe Unity? No "toy language for noobs" nonsense, serious business, usable result.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
