|
IE 11 is doing a lot of 'waiting for xxxxx' this week, is anyone else seeing this?
I wonder if its to do with the bolus of updates it was forced to swallow recently, but the Telegraph, Hotmail, Fox, all sorts of pages just aren't displaying.
edit
Got fed up so I rebooted. Its back to normal now.
Good old Microsoft eh? What a joke.
modified 24-Jun-15 8:54am.
|
|
|
|
|
Munchies_Matt wrote: IE
Well, there's your problem! 
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Corporately, we were moved to IE 11 last week; so far, not so bad.
As a developer, I can also use Chrome.
But more to the point...
We have a 3rd party browser based application in SharePoint that uses Abode SVG viewer. Yes, not good on all fronts.
After the IE 11 push, the SVG viewer won't load (or isn't registered? not sure which). The 'fix' has been to uninstall/reinstall the SVG viewer. As an admin, I can; regulary abusers can't.
Has anyone else seen this or have any ideas?
|
|
|
|
|
Why would you need a plugin? IE9+ supports SVG natively[^], with the caveat that you might need to use a workaround[^] to make it scale properly.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you.. interesting.. it is a 3rd party product, so I'm not sure how they are implementing the graphics. But, I'll relay that information (the person who works on it sits next to me).
|
|
|
|
|
Well the bits only went to grab a byte, when they come back it should be quicker.
|
|
|
|
|
You shouldn't be visiting xxxxx sites, then.
|
|
|
|
|
My IE11 started misbehaving last week...constant freezing for up to two or three minutes at a time. I made Chrome the default browser and carried on. My only complaint about Chrome is that I can't seem to find the 'home' button/link. Getting back to a search window means closing then re-opening the tab...or maybe I'm blind!
"Go forth into the source" - Neal Morse
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, chrome and firefox wont run on our systems though.
Stil, rebooting the pc seems to have fixed it. It had ben no for days and days. Typical MSFT.
|
|
|
|
|
kmoorevs wrote: My only complaint about Chrome is that I can't seem to find the 'home' button/link.
There is a check-box in the Appearance category of Settings to enable a "Home" button on the toolbar. However you really don't need to return anywhere to search. Just search from the URL box.
Contrary to popular belief, nobody owes you anything.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks! Just what I was looking for! 
"Go forth into the source" - Neal Morse
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Guys,
I've been tasked with identifying a potential outsourcing partner for my current company (Not getting into whether I agree with outsourcing!) - I've got a couple of leads (Geeks, Chettu), but I thought I'd see if any of you guys have had any good experiences with UK based outsourcers. Not wedded to the it being UK (that's more for my management simplicity - timezones and all that jazz), so if there's a good overseas one, please do let me know.
Also interested in "Don't for god's sake use these guys because...." comments!
Cheers all!
C# has already designed away most of the tedium of C++.
|
|
|
|
|
I have worked with Cap Gemini[^] in the past - and it was OK.
However as with all outsourcing you need good managers on your side or the whole thing will go a bit    
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oh yeah - been there, done that. We have an Indian office and they struggle to take responsibility and require constant supervision....
The only ones that trump this is our dealings with a Russian group. They had a constant time estimation:
Us:
How long will 'xxxxxx' take?
Them:
That be big change...um...two weeks.
or:
Not sure...um...two weeks.
Any change was two weeks....how that works I don't know
This all led us to use the phrase:
From Russia, with Bugs
|
|
|
|
|
RichardGrimmer wrote: Not getting into whether I agree with outsourcing!
Er ... your slip's showing so I kinda think you just did!
|
|
|
|
|
You need to define what you are outsourcing, hardware and infrastructure and/or software support and/or development etc. If you are outsourcing the lot then you have my sincerest sympathies. I work for an org that did that in the 90s, they lost their IP and competitive edge and have spent the last decade getting it back!
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
You won't be doing agile with an outsourced team. It's not compatible, so don't even try. Although the team may do agile internally that's their business and not your direct concern. Always be very clear on:
1) What (Requirements)
2) How (Project Plan/Resource management)
3) When (Deadlines)
Even though the team may bitch and moan about it, insist on strong documentation especially for interfaces between sub-systems and external systems. On the other hand, don't bitch about late deliverables or things not working correctly at the end of a phone. Do it in person and do it as much as necessary; even if you have to live in their office for a while to get things back on track i.e. don't let a bad situation drift for the sake of a trip on an aeroplane or train.
Make sure you have a very strong testing function in-house to verify the deliverables. Do not rely on any third parties for this. Get official hand-over and on-going maintenance back in-house sooner rather than later. That's when you find out just how wrong the solution really is and, all too often, lengthy bug fixing cycles are used as an excuse for not delivering.
|
|
|
|
|
You need to impose frequent releases every iteration of your project. Every 1-2 weeks on Friday, they shorten feedback loops--you learn what you did right, what you did wrong, and what should be changed sooner--so you can act on this feedback improving further work faster
|
|
|
|
|
There's no point in insisting on an arbitrary sprints or cycles if you don't have the capability to receive and verify the work within that time frame. It is really bad to be testing version 1 and finding faults while your outsourced team is working on version 2 or 3 or 4 ...
|
|
|
|
|
Yes its really bad to be testing version 1 and development team working on version 2,3 or 4.
This should be restricted proceeding to version 2,3 or 4 until no feedback yet in version 1.
|
|
|
|
|
If you are outsourceing any more than very simple routine stuff then you are not what you say you are then you are not writing the software, your outsourcer is. God help you.
|
|
|
|
|
It truly depends on what you are looking for. What skill sets, and what the final deliverables (to you) and the final products (to your clients) will be. (Are they delivering a DLL a library or a whole chunk of a shipping application vs. a piece of a .Net website).
I run a small outsourcing team.
One of our rules is simple: "Most clients know what they want, but must be shown what they need!"
That last piece means we spend a lot more time up front defining what it is.
We have clients we have been working with for 16+ years, and get new projects every year. This is something you should look for. We often come in after a primary contractor has failed miserably.
Plan for it to cost 2-3x what doing it in house would cost. This is because of the upfront learning curves, tool sets, extra communications, meetings, testing, feedback, potentially failed integration.
BTW, we plan on failing our first integration tests! We have been doing this too long. And if it does not fail, then we will need that time to make sure there are no deeper issues, or to spend on tasks that were previously out of scope.
One of the services we offer is the problem solution. One of our clients needed to fix a ton of COBOL code (which is NOT our strong suit). We solved the problem, working with one of their people and assisted them in getting their team to handle the implementation.
Feel free to private email me from this reply. We are US and Russia based. I would be happy to discuss how to structure this, or restructure it to make it more workable. We have also served as PMs over other contractors for companies having issues with contractors.
Finally, it is NEVER about the Consulting Company. It is always about the specific team you get assigned. You want a team that has been successful, not a new team at XYZ Corp.
|
|
|
|
|
Our company used Chetu in India - what a debacle. Work that should have taken less than a month went on for several, and nothing usable delivered in that time until we pulled the plug. What they did deliver was amateurish at best, and no where near production quality.
I started with the company using Chetu later in that project, and while the code quality was terrible, the whole process could have managed better:
- Start with a small project first. See how they handle that, before giving them more important work to do. This will not only give you a sense of the quality of the work, but also how best to work with them.
- Develop a clearly defined specification for the work to be performed. It should be sufficiently detailed that there is no ambiguity as to what is to be delivered.
- Upon delivering the specification to the outsourcer, have them provide clear estimates as to timelines and deliverables. Negotiate with them if you are not satisfied with this estimates, until you have something that both you and outsourcer are comfortable with and agree to.
Remember, their business model is to generate as many billable hours as possible. Having a clear specification and time estimates are crucial, and should be made part of any agreement with the outsourcer. Otherwise you might find that the project never ends, and you having huge overruns in time and money.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
