|
Jeremy Falcon wrote: Marc man, what are you using for an IDE?
I'm using Sublime. I suppose I could try VS Code, but then I have to figure out how to set it up to FTP saves over to the Ubuntu VM running the app. (Editing in Ubuntu sucks, one of many reasons being that the numeric keypad cursor keys don't work, and using the "T" is not something I ever got used to and cramps my fingers.)
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
I use Sublime also. It supports syntax highlighting. You having a rough day? You need a hug? I can code one up for ya in JavaScript.
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
If that didn't make your half program red, you use the wrong IDE. In fact a simple editor that highlight keywords would detect that (Why is the "funtion" not highlighted?). When people used notepad (not notepad++) for programming they had all these problems with typos and semicolons. Those were difficult ancient times...
|
|
|
|
|
Be mindful of the dark side...
|
|
|
|
|
I once spend 15 minutes trying to write a simple Hello World in JavaScript. I had pretty much the same problem. Boy, do you feel stupid when you have years of experience and fail at Hello World
Luckily I now know the problem is JavaScript, not me
I find JavaScript doable nowadays, but only when I don't have to deal with other people's code.
|
|
|
|
|
Be glad that you hate it. A couple of my coworkers are full on Stockholm syndrome.
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you think that's bad - you should try missing a semicolon after a class definition in C++
|
|
|
|
|
|
Really? No syntax hilighting? `function` is blue and `funtion` is grey. Or you're using the wrong editor.
Otherwise, prepend this to all your javascript:
var funtion = function(){ throw new Error("you typed _funtion_ instead of _function_"); };
var x = funtion() {};
|
|
|
|
|
[joke] pro tip: don't program in notepad [/joke]
Just use vscode[^]
Elephant elephant elephant, sunshine sunshine sunshine
|
|
|
|
|
I know the math is sketchy as hell but I love this any way.
Answer
| 0 0 | = | 100 - 100 100 - 100 | | 0 0 | = | (10*10) - (10*10) (10*10) - (10*10) | | 0 0 | = | 102 - 102 10 * (10 - 10) | |
| 0 0 | = | (10 + 10)(10 - 10) 10 * (10 - 10) | | 0 0 | = | (10 + 10) 10 | | 0 0 | = | 20 10 | | 0 0 | = | 2 | PROVED |
Not my work but I couldn't find a good copy of the original image.
I had to type all the HTML by hand, sigh. Works on Firefox.
if (Object.DividedByZero == true) { Universe.Implode(); }
Meus ratio ex fortis machina. Simplicitatis de formae ac munus. -Foothill, 2016
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot factorize or simplify anything once you have a zero somewhere in a multiplication.
(10 + 10) x (10 - 10) = (1 + 45687) x (10 - 10) = (21321 + 765461364165) x (10 - 10)
The whole reasoning is therefore biased.
You always obtain more by being rather polite and armed than polite only.
|
|
|
|
|
I know but it makes most people do a double take and think about it for a bit.
if (Object.DividedByZero == true) { Universe.Implode(); }
Meus ratio ex fortis machina. Simplicitatis de formae ac munus. -Foothill, 2016
|
|
|
|
|
phil.o wrote: (10 + 10) x (10 - 10) = (1 + 45687) x (10 - 10) = (21321 + 765461364165) x (10 - 10)
10+10 = 20
10-10 = 0
20x0 = 0?
Rules for the FOSW ![ ^]
if(this.signature != "")
{
MessageBox.Show("This is my signature: " + Environment.NewLine + signature);
}
else
{
MessageBox.Show("404-Signature not found");
}
|
|
|
|
|
And, which point are you trying to make?
You always obtain more by being rather polite and armed than polite only.
|
|
|
|
|
i don'T get why you have so big numbers in the equation
Rules for the FOSW ![ ^]
if(this.signature != "")
{
MessageBox.Show("This is my signature: " + Environment.NewLine + signature);
}
else
{
MessageBox.Show("404-Signature not found");
}
|
|
|
|
|
Just to express the fact that, once you have a zero involved somewhere in a multiplication, you cannot factorize or simplify anything.
You always obtain more by being rather polite and armed than polite only.
|
|
|
|
|
I see
Rules for the FOSW ![ ^]
if(this.signature != "")
{
MessageBox.Show("This is my signature: " + Environment.NewLine + signature);
}
else
{
MessageBox.Show("404-Signature not found");
}
|
|
|
|
|
I had a friends college professor back in the 70's prove that 0 = 1. Using the same ideas. It took awhile to find the divide by 0. It always brings back fond memories of math.
|
|
|
|
|
Ah, math. It's the closest we can get to a perfect system and yet it still has problems
if (Object.DividedByZero == true) { Universe.Implode(); }
Meus ratio ex fortis machina. Simplicitatis de formae ac munus. -Foothill, 2016
|
|
|
|
|
You hear that rumbling noise? It's every math professor who ever lived collectively turning in their graves.
Maybe your signature too.
|
|
|
|
|
It's Wednesday and I needed a good laugh to start the day.
if (Object.DividedByZero == true) { Universe.Implode(); }
Meus ratio ex fortis machina. Simplicitatis de formae ac munus. -Foothill, 2016
|
|
|
|
|
the solution is actually in your signature, smart
|
|
|
|
|
I never did like that whole you can't divide by zero thing anyway. To me, something divided by nothing should be nothing {0} but according to math something divided by nothing is everything {inf}. Go figure.
if (Object.DividedByZero == true) { Universe.Implode(); }
Meus ratio ex fortis machina. Simplicitatis de formae ac munus. -Foothill, 2016
|
|
|
|