|
well star trek has a few "better" sequels
then again with later release shows changing the past, past-future, future-past ... are they really sequels? requels? unquels? un-de-se-re-quels? ...
(terminator likewise but T1 definitely had the best lines.)
pestilence [ pes-tl-uh ns ] noun
1. a deadly or virulent epidemic disease. especially bubonic plague.
2. something that is considered harmful, destructive, or evil.
Synonyms: pest, plague, people
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: I'd be hard pressed to think of half a dozen sequels that were as good as the original, much less better. Put Wrath of Khan on your list (but only because the first Star Trek movie was so dire).
The second Paddington movie was a brilliantly crafted piece of work, too.
An even smaller list would be of movies that are better than the books they're based on.
The only one I can think of is Logan's Run. It's not a brilliant movie, by any reasonable standards, but a Hell of a lot better than the godawful book.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Mark_Wallace wrote: An even smaller list would be of movies that are better than the books they're based on.
"Blade runner" / "Do androids dream of electric sheep?" is one of 'em.
"Ender's Game" definitely in the poo pile.
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: "Ender's Game" definitely in the poo pile.
Isn't that mostly the curse of high expectations?
The movie wasn't bad actually, it was just that the book was so much better.
|
|
|
|
|
I think the problem was that the movie was just too short - they had to cut out 2/3rds of the book to fit it in, and what was left didn't make any sense.
If they'd done it as a "The Expanse" style hour-long-per-episode TV series, it could have been brilliant.
But most movies are like that - a short story spread over 2 hours.
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
The same as with the ring trilogy.
Way to short I say, way to long my wife says.
|
|
|
|
|
Aliens. It is also a vastly different movie than Alien - which I view as more of a space based slasher movie.
If you can't laugh at yourself - ask me and I will do it for you.
|
|
|
|
|
DRHuff wrote: Aliens. It is also a vastly different movie than Alien Indeed.
I allowed my young daughter to watch Aliens, because it's just a monster/action movie, and kids live monster/action stories.
Alien, however, wasn't on the cards until she was a lot older.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
My folks were country fans and never missed an opportunity it seems to crank up the volume whenever they heard Kenny Rogers on the radio. As a kid, I hated it.
But as an adult, I've grown to appreciate what he did. The Gambler is such a catchy classic.
|
|
|
|
|
Source[^], but the NYT has the same thing.
I really don't like the "one in __", in this kind of context; it's just not precise enough language, for me.
A back-of-the-mind inference is that each family or grouping of five people has to choose one to stay at home. Even though the reader knows that is not the case, it still fuzzes the meaning, subconsciously (and if you don't know how to write for the subconscious, you shouldn't be writing headlines).
Percentage and fractions have no such implications: "20% of" and "a fifth of" don't conjure any illusions*.
* OK, so who immediately thought "unless you chop people into fifths!"? That's what I mean by writing for the subconscious.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: Percentage and fractions have no such implications: "20% Now you are assuming that they know what percentages are, quite a bold assumption
|
|
|
|
|
RickZeeland wrote: Now you are assuming that they know what percentages are, quite a bold assumption 90% of assumptions about other people are wrong* -- unless they don't understand percentages, of course, in which case, assuming they're stoopid is 100% correct.
* Yes, that's one of the 78% of made-up-on-the-spot statistics.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Who are you calling "they"?
(90% of statistics are made up)
If you can keep your head while those about you are losing theirs, perhaps you don't understand the situation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
It's for people who count on their fingers.
|
|
|
|
|
Richard MacCutchan wrote: It's for people who count on their fingers. It wouldn't surprise me.
We should put out fake news that it's only 4%, to prompt them to maybe get an education (or an additional prosthetic limb).
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Mark_Wallace wrote: "a fifth of" don't conjure any illusions
Depends on what you're drinking!
"Go forth into the source" - Neal Morse
|
|
|
|
|
kmoorevs wrote: Depends on what you're drinking! ... And how many fifths!
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Do you have to pay for your own dutch oven?
|
|
|
|
|
And if you don't want to cook at home, are you forced to buy freedom fries?
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: In matters of ovens the fault of the Dutch Is offering too little and asking too much.
|
|
|
|
|
His price: 70 quid:
Care Friars Balsam 50ml - 09/21 Expiry Date | eBay[^]
Our survey said:
Care Friars Balsam 50ml[^]
Yes, the top answer is £2.19 -- and yes, that means he's selling for a mere 3100% mark up.
What a saint.
I've reported him to ebay as a coronavirus profiteer. Feel free to pile another complaint on top.
(Remember to save what you type into ebay forms before hitting the "Submit" button; they have a tendency to make you type it all again).
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Mark_Wallace wrote: Feel free to pile another complaint on top. somewhere else please, facebook etc.
Not the lounge, it's not the right forum for this, not the right audience.
pestilence [ pes-tl-uh ns ] noun
1. a deadly or virulent epidemic disease. especially bubonic plague.
2. something that is considered harmful, destructive, or evil.
Synonyms: pest, plague, people
|
|
|
|
|
I don't do social chlamydia, and this is a topic we've already talked about a few times.
Feel free to repost, wherever you like.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Mark_Wallace wrote: Feel free to repost, wherever you like. Done: Inappropriate use of the lounge[^]
pestilence [ pes-tl-uh ns ] noun
1. a deadly or virulent epidemic disease. especially bubonic plague.
2. something that is considered harmful, destructive, or evil.
Synonyms: pest, plague, people
|
|
|
|