|
Thank you.
In general, I lack a sense of humor, but once in a while I find something amusing and feel the need to share. I agonized about posting in the "Lounge" (of a "programming web site"), but since I wasn't able to come up with a comparable "computer cartoon", I though I would risk it. Some people are better with words than pictures, obviously.
It was only in wine that he laid down no limit for himself, but he did not allow himself to be confused by it.
― Confucian Analects: Rules of Confucius about his food
|
|
|
|
|
Next time you might consider posting it in: The Weird and The Wonderful[^]
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm not saying you're old or anything but...
You are dating yourself...
If you can't laugh at yourself - ask me and I will do it for you.
|
|
|
|
|
Oh, you mean like with "birth date"? ....
It was only in wine that he laid down no limit for himself, but he did not allow himself to be confused by it.
― Confucian Analects: Rules of Confucius about his food
|
|
|
|
|
Gerry Schmitz wrote: this.UxDate.Date.DateTime.Date;
Without context, it would be fun review comment once they see this code.
|
|
|
|
|
Exactly! You got it too.
It was only in wine that he laid down no limit for himself, but he did not allow himself to be confused by it.
― Confucian Analects: Rules of Confucius about his food
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actually, leaves do make great fertilizer, even for lawns, provided that they're not lying too thickly.
|
|
|
|
|
The DateTimeOffset already exposes the Date property:
DateTimeOffset.Date Property (System) | Microsoft Docs[^]
So your code should be:
details.BirthDate = this.UxDate.Date.Date; There, that's much better!
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Like most people lately (I suspect) I've been using Amazon and FleaBay more than usual simply because I can get the bits I want reasonably quickly, and don't have to meet infected people ...
And I've noticed that since the start of the pandemic, their backend systems have been getting worse and worse - most of the time now I get a "we're going to deliver your order today!" email about 6 or 8 hours after the goods arrived on my doorstep. You can sort of understand this, volume is way up, and systems are getting clogged.
And that means one of two things:
1) AWS doesn't expand automatically / gracefully to meet need / volume levels
Or
2) Amazon don't use their own cloud offering.
Neither of these exactly fills me with desire to use AWS: either it doesn't actually do what they say, it costs way too much to expand it to fit the need, or they don't trust it enough to use it ...
Anyone here from Amazon and have an idea which it is?
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: 1) AWS doesn't expand automatically / gracefully to meet need / volume levels
Or
2) Amazon don't use their own cloud offering. Both...
(I suspect that if we have here an Amazon employee we will not know it )
"The only place where Success comes before Work is in the dictionary." Vidal Sassoon, 1928 - 2012
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: since the start of the pandemic, their backend systems have been getting worse and worse Yes, I've been suffering with that as well.
|
|
|
|
|
Ah, the famous MWS (MacCutchan Web Services)
|
|
|
|
|
|
3) Debug/testing code made it into production.
Thread.Sleep(new TimeSpan(8, 0, 0));
order.SendConfirmation();
|
|
|
|
|
Hmmm,
Maybe your e-mails are being relayed via the SMTP server on Tethys[^] delaying the delivery time.
|
|
|
|
|
Hmmm ... even I didn't try that one: "The cheque is en route to Tethys ..."
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
SMTP - Saturnian Moon Transfer Protocol?
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: and don't have to meet infected people
I thought you're free to do as you please now.
Wrong is evil and must be defeated. - Jeff Ello
Never stop dreaming - Freddie Kruger
|
|
|
|
|
Better safe than sorry - I've had it, but I have no idea if I can become infectious again by contacting the virus. Yes, my immune system should fight it off much, much better, but does that mean I am not infectious? i=or if I am, for how long? I don't know, and I doubt if there is much research on it.
So I prefer to err on the side of caution: I assume that I may be infectious but symptomless at all times, and maintain social distance / mask / gloves / washing as if I hadn't had it. The last thing I want to do if give it to someone else without knowing!
That's what masks are there for: to protect others from me, not me from others!
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: So I prefer to err on the side of caution:
Besides... there are already several documented cases of people getting it again. So that with the inmunity is not like many people was expecting / whishing.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Nelek wrote: there are already several documented cases of people getting it again. So that with the inmunity is not like many people was expecting / whishing
Oh, well, there are always exceptions where you have people whose immune system doesn't work like it should.
If it was a real problem (For society that is, not the poor sods that got infected again) there would be a lot more than "several".
The fact that it's just "several", rather than thousands or millions, is actually good news.
That said, I would probably prefer to err on the side of cautious as well. I don't want to find out if I'm one of those people.
Actually, I'd prefer to not get it the first time if I may choose.
Wrong is evil and must be defeated. - Jeff Ello
Never stop dreaming - Freddie Kruger
|
|
|
|
|
Jörgen Andersson wrote: I would probably prefer to err on the side of cautious as well. I don't want to find out if I'm one of those people.
Actually, I'd prefer to not get it the first time if I may choose. Agree 100%
That's why I have been keeping a low profile anyways. For me only difference in my daily routine due to the current "partial lockdown" is to wear the mask in one or two situations more than usually (i.e. walking in open street parking-office-parking in the company ground).
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: but does that mean I am not infectious?
Nope, that's not how immunity works, but probably much much less by many magnitudes.
It would follow the normal distribution curve, while you probably belong to the group in the middle of the curve that's hardly infectious at all if re-infected, there's always the possibility that you belong to the far off edge.
Wrong is evil and must be defeated. - Jeff Ello
Never stop dreaming - Freddie Kruger
|
|
|
|