|
It can be done, but the wavelet has to want to transform.
Will Rogers never met me.
|
|
|
|
|
Flesh+Blood[^] really brought back a couple of fond memories. Enjoy
|
|
|
|
|
yuck! That version sucks!
|
|
|
|
|
Erudite_Eric wrote: yuck! That version sucks!
I know some find it a bit cloying - but I like it ...
|
|
|
|
|
Haven't heard that one in a while. Is one of those albums I remember listing to a long time ago. Haven't heard the album since that time. Thanks
It was broke, so I fixed it.
|
|
|
|
|
I actually bought it on tape - had a JVC 'walkman' kind of thing, a bit larger than Sonys product ... and it was my favourite for the rest of that summer ...
|
|
|
|
|
Espen Harlinn wrote: Flesh+Blood really brought back a couple of fond memories Of the christmas dinner table???
Anything that is unrelated to elephants is irrelephant Anonymous ----- The problem with quotes on the internet is that you can never tell if they're genuine Winston Churchill, 1944 ----- I'd just like a chance to prove that money can't make me happy. Me, all the time
|
|
|
|
|
No, not this time
|
|
|
|
|
have an old computer with 64mb. want to install linux with a small system require to act as the firewall server only. any one suggestion?
|
|
|
|
|
Stick the disk in and turn it on?
Never underestimate the power of stupid things in large numbers
--- Serious Sam
|
|
|
|
|
Not set one up in a while but I used to use smoothwall[^]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I'd look at OpenBSD. I used it once as a transparent firewall. Didn't have any hacks that I know of, so I assume it worked.
Jack of all trades, master of none, though often times better than master of one.
|
|
|
|
|
The Red Hat 7.1 I have (from 2001) seems to require a minimum of 32MB and a 486. Does your system have a 3.5" floppy drive?
|
|
|
|
|
Linux is for kids.
The grownups use FreeBSD.
M0n0wall[^] and pfSense[^] are FreeBSD firewalls that operate off a livecd, USB stick or, CF card. They recommend 64MB RAM.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi All,
Any recommendations for a printer (colour yes, wireless printing nice but not a deal breaker) for use once or twice a month (or less) usually to print-out instructions & the odd letter(?)/web pages. My Canon i250 that I was using with out problem refused as the waste ink absorbers are full, I am planning on taking it to bits and trying to clean them (purchase delayed until failure to complete) I have grabbed a pair of rubber gloves for the purpose. Now to search boob tube for a how to vid!
|
|
|
|
|
glennPattonWork wrote: Now to search boob tube for a how to vid!
Now that sentence I firstly skimmed over and my tiny little mind didn't read it as itended
Every day, thousands of innocent plants are killed by vegetarians.
Help end the violence EAT BACON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canon Pixma 6450 printer/scanner wifi airprint thing seems very good (got one before xmas)
I have a spare if you're in the UK BNIB
|
|
|
|
|
looked at that one, I have a separate Canon scanner though...
|
|
|
|
|
I use Epsons - have for ages. Mostly because they are very economic to run, since the printhead is not part of the cartridge (unlike HP) and they use separate cartridges for each colour - so if Cyan runs out, you don't have to chuck away Magenta and Yellow as well. They also have a fairly straight paper path which means they can take thicker media (I get 260gsm photo card through easily) and don't peel labels off internally either...
Currently I have a BX305FW which includes scanner with sheet feed and a fax (not that I use that part) and has wireless built in. The exact model is probably well out of date, but they will do an alternative for around £100.
Never underestimate the power of stupid things in large numbers
--- Serious Sam
|
|
|
|
|
glennPattonWork wrote: I think I need a new printer...
You ink so ?
Although I'm a Canon fan for most things I steer away from Canon for printing. I have an HP printer/scanner/copier (with wifi stuff) and am very happy it. The previous HP I owned was also very good. The 2 Canon printers I had before were nothing but trouble. Our current HP was close to 100€ so nothing majorly expensive.
|
|
|
|
|
After having issues with ink printers (not working anymore if not used for 2-3 months in a row etc.) I resorted to a laser printer (from Samsung). Got one with scanner, wifi etc. all inclusive. The color quality may not be as good as with ink printers, however, I also don't have to wait for the paper to dry up And it's a hell lot faster than those ink printers.
Didn't regret it yet. They might be a bit (yeah, maybe a lot) more expensive than inkjets, but they are quite affordable compared to a few years past.
|
|
|
|