|
But not at you, so you can join in on the fun.
|
|
|
|
|
See CodeProject article "Determine Platform Affinity 32 bit, 64 bit or Any CPU for a Managed .NET PE".
In the past I used another utility, but I can't remember the name ...
|
|
|
|
|
I try to see if there is better way to find out this info since many years passed.
in my mind, I want to find certain byte/section to identify if this is a managed assembly.
diligent hands rule....
|
|
|
|
|
OK
I asked Mrs Google about difference between SSD and Flash drive , and this
is what she said :
What's the difference between flash and SSD storage? | PC Gamer[^]
In much lesser wording:
They are read / write storage devices (RAM ?) , some connected via USB...
where the actual storage memory is implemented with different technology.
What could be added to my description ?
|
|
|
|
|
The term "Flash drives" generally refer to removable drives, while SSD's refer to drives 'built-in' to the computer. Both types use solid-state devices for storage, rather than spinning magnetic media.
Software Zen: delete this;
|
|
|
|
|
SSDs typically use NAND memory that it much faster than the memory type used in USB drives.
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
If I stick a laptop SSD in a USB housing...
Anyway, I don't think the typical consumer cares. I know I don't. And things change so rapidly.
|
|
|
|
|
Would USB "Flash drive" be "limited" in speed by USB bus?
PS I just asked as a technical curiosity question - I do not want to get into personal opinions.
|
|
|
|
|
The latest USB standard (3.2 Gen 2) goes as high as 10 Gb/second. The actual data rate is lower because of the protocol overhead. I doubt that the flash memory used in flash drives can keep up with that. It should be able to keep up with USB 2.0 (480 Mb/second).
OTOH, even SATA SSD drives can reach speeds of 4.5 Gb/second of data. This is close to the SATA III speed (6 Gb/second), if you allow for the overhead. A PCIe or NVMe drive is even faster.
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
You've thrown me by saying "(RAM?)". While at an electronic level, RAM and Flash might use the same or similar technology (I don't enough to say yes or no) SSD is definitely not "RAM" which is very specifically RANDOM ACCESS memory. As such RAM is directly accessible at a much more granular level than an SSD is (normally) accessed at. RAM doesn't have a "file system" mapped onto it, and yet (with some exceptions such as when formatting or writing boot blocks - perhaps) an SSD is normally accessed via a filing system, reading/writing "blocks" of data within a specific file. Clearly within the SSD itself, each byte is directly accessible but from an external viewpoint, it's not.
I'm probably not quite right on some of the implementation details but in general, the term "SSD" is used to refer to a solid-state device giving access to data via a file system of some sort, whilst RAM is directly addressible. I think that's an important enough distinction to warrant removing any reference to RAM from the SSD / Flash discussion...
|
|
|
|
|
Salvatore Terress wrote: SSD and Flash drive
Presumably you are asking for a technical answer.
I would surprise me if the answer is in fact technical versus nothing more than marketing.
|
|
|
|
|
if you are offended by cat videos perhaps this will help MSN[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Stanford Lecture: Dr. Don Knuth - Dancing Cells (2023) - YouTube
I haven't watched it yet, so I can't comment. Apparently, Stanford has made many of the Christmas lectures available, so there's plenty of watching, for those so inclined.
"A little song, a little dance, a little seltzer down your pants"
Chuckles the clown
|
|
|
|
|
I really wanted to watch it but age has crept up on him and he's so hard to follow, I couldn't watch but a few minutes.
I have two of his books and they are incredible.
What a brilliant human being.
As the aircraft designer said, "Simplicate and add lightness".
PartsBin an Electronics Part Organizer - Release Version 1.3.0 JaxCoder.com
Latest Article: SimpleWizardUpdate
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks! I've heard much about Donald Knuth through the years, but somehow just never got one of his books. Seeing the examples, and learning of the dancing links/cells, I will be getting one of his books in the near future.
Arrays, structure arrays, self-referencing arrays, pointer arrays, etc. are things that interest me.
"Go forth into the source" - Neal Morse
"Hope is contagious"
|
|
|
|
|
kmoorevs wrote: Arrays, structure arrays, self-referencing arrays, pointer arrays, etc. are things that interest me.
If you are interested in algorithms, treat yourself to The Art of Computer Programming, 3rd Edition. To date, there are 5 volumes and Knuth plans to add more as long as he holds out. They aren't cheap, but they will tell you more than you ever wanted to know about algorithms.
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
A gentler and more student-friendly book on Algorithms is written by his doctoral student and also a noted Professor himself, Robert Sedgewick. This is one of my favourites.
|
|
|
|
|
I have both, but I prefer Knuth for its comprehensiveness. Also, my lecturer in Data Structures and Algorithms (many moons ago) used Knuth's style when describing algorithms, so I'm used to it.
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: NASA Tightbeams a Cat Video From 31 Million Kilometers Away
If the Muppets were still being produced, they could have a Cats in Space to go with their Pigs in Space sketches.
OriginalGriff wrote: I guess we can be glad it wasn't pr0n, really...
They're Americans, who have a rather puritan view of such matters (at least in public...)
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
Daniel Pfeffer wrote: They're Americans, who have a rather puritan view of such matters (at least in public...)
Unfortunately for Americans, that's a totally fair assessment.
And yet, do you really want our first successful contact with an alien species to be humans mid-coitus? We look ridiculous.
Also I want to try to explain underpants to aliens. "Small secret pants we wear under our regular pants"
Check out my IoT graphics library here:
https://honeythecodewitch.com/gfx
And my IoT UI/User Experience library here:
https://honeythecodewitch.com/uix
|
|
|
|
|
In Britain we only wear a single pair of pants, and they go under our trousers.
|
|
|
|
|
Unless you wear a kilt of course.
|
|
|
|
|
With the exceptions of the dress uniforms of certain Scottish regiments, and certain formal occasions, I doubt that kilts are as popular, even in Scotland, as they used to be.
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
Be that as it may, perhaps a man named MacCutchan is more likely to than you and I.
|
|
|
|