|
Now I've lost me appetite!
Get me coffee and no one gets hurt!
|
|
|
|
|
How do you cut a boat in chunks? Apparently with a very big chain[^]
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
Damn!!!
I'd rather be phishing!
|
|
|
|
|
This is going to start a chain reaction...
|
|
|
|
|
Wow!
Get me coffee and no one gets hurt!
|
|
|
|
|
|
A very similar system was used to cut the bow section off the Kursk, only they used a cable instead of a chain. There was also the slight impediment of the Kursk being 108 metres underwater ...
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the link
|
|
|
|
|
|
Neat.
So apparently this is the place, but Google Maps doesn't show it. I thought Google Maps always showed the latest version, but it seems like the pictures predate the incident.
Google Earth however (the downloadable frontend) shows it if you go there and go to View / Historical Imagery.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm getting the sense that some (most) frameworks are just someone's attempt to keep from getting close and personal with something that can be quite satisfying.
PPE for the machine.
It was only in wine that he laid down no limit for himself, but he did not allow himself to be confused by it.
― Confucian Analects: Rules of Confucius about his food
|
|
|
|
|
I've posted it before and I'll post it again:
"We Don't Need No Steenkin' Frameworks."
Ravings en masse^ |
---|
"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
I'm kind of enjoying IoT where for the most part I can't afford them.
Real programmers use butterflies
|
|
|
|
|
Frameworks are overrated.
|
|
|
|
|
Slacker007 wrote: Frameworks are overrated. Ya, that stupid .Net Framework.
|
|
|
|
|
Software architecture as intimacy issues. I'm here for it.
Real programmers use butterflies
|
|
|
|
|
Yes; I settled for "satisfying".
It was only in wine that he laid down no limit for himself, but he did not allow himself to be confused by it.
― Confucian Analects: Rules of Confucius about his food
|
|
|
|
|
Gerry Schmitz wrote: frameworks If we get rid of all frameworks we have to start coding in voltage changes. I like frameworks. .Net for example.
|
|
|
|
|
You're confusing class libraries with "frameworks"; i.e. pattern overload.
It was only in wine that he laid down no limit for himself, but he did not allow himself to be confused by it.
― Confucian Analects: Rules of Confucius about his food
|
|
|
|
|
Gerry Schmitz wrote: You're confusing class libraries with "frameworks"; i.e. pattern overload. Possibly. I was just going off of wiki's definition of what a framework is:
Quote: In computer programming, a software framework is an abstraction in which software providing generic functionality can be selectively changed by additional user-written code, thus providing application-specific software.
|
|
|
|
|
I have absolutely nothing against the machine.
|
|
|
|
|
Please stop trying to paint black and white stripes on my back. I'm fed up with you badgering me.
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Strange. Those looked like 🐧, at least on Firefox.
|
|
|
|
|
No matter... They would work too...
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|