|
Just want to say thanks. I had done the same order as you installed vs.net first and then added IIS. Doing a reinstall apparently does not "install" the servcies to IIS. On my test box IIS had been installed first and all was fine but could not get things set up on my dev box.
ThoWeib wrote:
aspnet_regiis -i
Is just what I had been missing.
"Don't be so anti-american, would you?
KaЯl (to Paul Watson on Baseball Bats) 26 Nov '03 "
|
|
|
|
|
Hi everyone,
Given a row, how can I know the position of it in the table? for example.
MyDataSet.EmployeesRow row = myDataSet.Employees.FindByID(30);
what is the position of the row in the table?
Thanks in advance.
|
|
|
|
|
Please forgive the very newbie question, but is there any possible way to compile an application in VS.NET that does not require the end user to install the .NET Framework in order to run the application?
Tony
|
|
|
|
|
Only if your language of choice is C++.
C#, VB.NET, J#, and managed C++ all compile to an intermediate language (MSIL), which is then just-in-time compiled to machine code as the app is run by the end user.
Without the .NET framework installed on the computer running the .exe, the machine wouldn't know what to do with the MSIL, or have the resources to execute it.
Charlie
if(!curlies){ return; }
|
|
|
|
|
I know this has been asked before somewhere, but I can't find it. I'm running a windows-forms based application where the assemblies are located on a network share and all client PCs are setup to run the application from the network so I have only one copy of exes, dlls, etc. This works fine.
However, I can't copy new DLLs into place unless everyone closes their application. The DLLs are in use and the copy fails with "Sharing violation".
I was hoping that .NET would handle this someway so that I could run fat clients, yet have a single location for program files and be able to copy changes out without having to have everyone shutdown the application.
Help anyone?
Barry Etter
|
|
|
|
|
|
I’ve realy got problem searching for help in the MSDN for .NET stuff. I sure have the right version.
Earlier when searching for MFC classes there was no problem. Eg searching for an FTP class I directly find CInternetSession and so on…. but where to find about FTP in the .NET Framework??
using System.Windows…???….
.....and justice for all
APe
|
|
|
|
|
Figuring out the organization of the framework takes a little time.
In your particular case, there really isn't a FTP class in the framework. You might be able to get some of the classes to download files, but I've never tried it.
In any event, I did a search and came across THIS. I've never personally used it, but it might help you.
I, for one, do not think the problem was that the band was down. I think that the problem may have been that there was a Stonehenge monument on the stage that was in danger of being crushed by a dwarf.
-David St. Hubbins
|
|
|
|
|
The .Net Framework does not have any FTP support at this time. Not implying that it ever will.
However, there is a C# FTP sample on this site. Somewhere.
/\ |_ E X E GG
|
|
|
|
|
This site??
Where?
.....and justice for all
APe
|
|
|
|
|
d00_ape wrote:
This site??
Here at Code Project, check the C# section[^]. Here are a few links to articles that will help you:
Hope this helps.
- Nick Parker My Blog
|
|
|
|
|
I bank my head with a hammer.....
Thanks for help.
Codeproject is truly the best site!!
.....and justice for all
APe
|
|
|
|
|
Is there a .NET equivalent for Java applets or ActiveX controls embedded in web pages?
|
|
|
|
|
I was nosing around the the C:\WINDOWS\Microsoft.NET\Framework folder and noticed that there are two folders that seem to contain two different versions of the framework.
v1.0.3705 at 35MB
and 1.1.4322 at 66MB
Is there any reason to keep the older version?
Can the older one cause a problem?
Thanks
Ken Galer
Electrical Engineer
Preferred Utilities Corp.
Danbury, CT 06810
|
|
|
|
|
It will not cause a problem to have multiple versions of the .NET framework on your machine.
You can speficy in your app's config file which version of the framework it should use (presumably, the one it was compiled against and any other version which know to be 100% compatible).
Microsoft has said that they will not guarantee 100% backward compatibility when they release new versions of the framework. Having this side by side versioning and the ability to run several different versions without conflict (even simultaneously) allows developers to take advantage of new framework features as they become available without making apps written with earlier versions obsolete.
Charlie
if(!curlies){ return; }
|
|
|
|
|
Newbie question, but can someone please tell me where the costs are in a ASP.NET and VB.NET solution? I know VS.NET costs, Matrix is free, but what other parts of .NET does one pay for? Which ones of those are server versus per user? Any links to show dollar values?
Thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
I believe the only costs associated with .NET solutions are the license costs for running Windows Server.
|
|
|
|
|
There is no additional cost for an ASP.NET application over an ASP one.
Christian
I have drunk the cool-aid and found it wan and bitter. - Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
I haven't really tried this at all (I use VS.NET), but take a look at SharpDevelop.
It's a free C# and VB.NET IDE. I'm sure it's better than notepad.exe.
I, for one, do not think the problem was that the band was down. I think that the problem may have been that there was a Stonehenge monument on the stage that was in danger of being crushed by a dwarf.
-David St. Hubbins
|
|
|
|
|
I use it all the time. I have VS.NET 2002, but usually I use SharpDevelop. SharpDevelop is quite good. There's some featrures that are missing, like integrated debugging, full support for ActiveX controls, jump-to-definition, etc, but by the 1.0 release, which isn't far off, it should have those. It currently doesn't have a DB manager addin, but the next milestone will have it (it's AFAIK already complete).
It also has some features that VS.NET doesn't have, like compiling to .NET modules, and nested solutions.
|
|
|
|
|
I downloaded .NET1.1 as part of windows update some time ago. Recently I installed VS.NET 2002, but all the .NET version are saying 1.0.... but my installation list shows I definitely installed 1.1. Where will the 1.1 installation files be so I can reinstall, just to be sure?
When windows update downloads things, where does it keep them, because it would be useful to burn these files to CD so that updates can be repeated in case of a reinstallation.
Thanks.
Nursey
Nursey
|
|
|
|
|
I am pretty sure that the updates that you have downloaded can be found in the "C:\WINDOWS\Temp" directory.
The .NET framework files should be located in the "C:\WINDOWS\Microsoft.NET" directory.
BNEACETP
|
|
|
|
|
Is it possible to make an SNMP provider(agent,service,etc.) using the Management namespace? I've made a couple applications that trap SNMP events and poll SNMP properties. Now I want to make an application that can send my own custom events to other standard SNMP monitoring utilities. Please help! Anything to point me in the right direction will be much appreciated. Thank you!
|
|
|
|
|
Hello -- I am looking for information about the guarantees that .NET makes about assignments completing in a multithreading environment.
Specifically, consider the following program that asynchronously finds small factors of integers. The code has been intentionally structured in a slightly peculiar way in order to help make the question clear, and is not necessarily otherwise robust. The question is: what guarantee, if any, does .NET make about the assignment labeled "ASSIGNMENT (1)" completing before the result of the assignment is first referenced in the function "findFactor"? For example, how do we know that the value of d_n isn't in a cache somewhere waiting to be written to memory before findFactor accesses an old value of d_n, or that the compiler hasn't decided to do some instruction reordering so that the completion of the assignment of d_n happens to be delayed until after d_n is referenced in "findFactor"? Similarly, how do we know (or is it even guaranteed) that the assignment labeled "ASSIGNMENT (2)" has completed before the assigned variable is referenced in the Factor property?
<br />
using System;<br />
using System.Threading;<br />
<br />
<br />
class Factorer {<br />
<br />
public Factorer()<br />
{<br />
d_n = 0;<br />
d_completed = false;<br />
d_worker = null;<br />
d_asr = null;<br />
}<br />
<br />
public void BeginWork(int n)<br />
{<br />
if (n < 2)<br />
throw new ApplicationException("n must be an integer greater than 1");<br />
d_completed = false;<br />
d_worker = new WorkFunc(findFactor);<br />
d_n = n;
d_asr = d_worker.BeginInvoke(null,null);<br />
}<br />
<br />
<br />
public bool Completed {<br />
get {<br />
if ((! d_completed) && d_asr.IsCompleted) {<br />
d_worker.EndInvoke(d_asr);<br />
d_completed = true;<br />
}<br />
return d_completed;<br />
}<br />
}<br />
<br />
<br />
public int Factor {<br />
get {<br />
if (! Completed) {<br />
throw new ApplicationException<br />
("Cannot get result before work is complete.");<br />
}<br />
<br />
return d_factor;<br />
}<br />
}<br />
<br />
int d_n;<br />
int d_factor;<br />
WorkFunc d_worker;<br />
IAsyncResult d_asr;<br />
bool d_completed;<br />
<br />
delegate void WorkFunc();<br />
<br />
void findFactor()<br />
{<br />
int n = d_n;<br />
<br />
if (n == 2) {<br />
d_factor = 0;<br />
return;<br />
}<br />
int u = (int) Math.Sqrt(n);<br />
for (int i = 2; i <= u; i++) {<br />
if ((n % i) == 0) {<br />
d_factor = i;
return;<br />
}<br />
}<br />
d_factor = 0;<br />
}<br />
}<br />
<br />
<br />
class FactorMain<br />
{<br />
public static void Main()<br />
{<br />
int n = 29337827;<br />
Factorer F = new Factorer();<br />
F.BeginWork(n);<br />
while (! F.Completed) {<br />
Thread.Sleep(0);<br />
}<br />
int d = F.Factor;<br />
if (d == 0)<br />
Console.WriteLine("{0} is prime");<br />
else<br />
Console.WriteLine("{0}={1}*{2}", n, d, n/d);<br />
}<br />
}<br />
|
|
|
|
|
I am a novice programmer in VC++ and Win32 SDK and working in system area. I just wanted to know whether I should start learning VC++ 7.0 or VC 6.00 is good enough in terms of future
|
|
|
|